• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨时间的建模选择:反应-强化物可辨别性的影响。

Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.

作者信息

Davison Michael, Cowie Sarah

机构信息

The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Jan;117(1):36-52. doi: 10.1002/jeab.723. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1002/jeab.723
PMID:34734651
Abstract

This experiment asks whether timing is affected by animals' discrimination of response-reinforcer contingencies, and if so, how this effect can be understood. Six pigeons were trained on a procedure in which concurrent-schedule reinforcer ratios between left and right keys changed at 30 s after the last reinforcer. One stimulus signaled a reinforcer-ratio reversal from 9:1 to 1:9 on that key, and the other stimulus signaled the inverse reversal, with the key on which these stimuli occurred randomized. Across conditions, the physical difference between the stimuli signaling the two responses was varied and the directional changes in the reinforcer ratio signaled by each stimulus were reversed. Choice changed appropriately across time when the two stimuli were discriminable, and points of subjective equality fell with decreasing stimulus difference. A model which assumed that reinforcers obtained in time bins were redistributed across other time bins according to ogivally changing standard deviations, and between response locations according to an ogivally changing redistribution measure, accounted well for the data. This model was shown to be preferable to one in which across-time redistributions were scalar, and across-location redistribution was constant. These results show the critical importance of stimulus-response-reinforcer discriminability to measures of timing.

摘要

本实验探讨时间安排是否受动物对反应-强化物 contingency 的辨别影响,若有影响,该效应如何理解。对六只鸽子进行训练,采用一种程序,即左右按键的并发强化物比率在最后一次强化物出现后 30 秒改变。一种刺激信号表示该按键上强化物比率从 9:1 反转至 1:9,另一种刺激信号表示相反的反转,且呈现这些刺激的按键是随机的。在不同条件下,区分两种反应的刺激之间的物理差异有所变化,且每种刺激所表示的强化物比率的方向变化也被反转。当两种刺激可辨别时,选择随时间适当变化,主观相等点随刺激差异减小而下降。一个模型假设,在时间区间内获得的强化物根据呈 ogivally 变化的标准差在其他时间区间重新分配,并根据呈 ogivally 变化的重新分配度量在反应位置之间重新分配,该模型能很好地解释数据。结果表明,该模型优于一种跨时间重新分配是标量且跨位置重新分配是恒定的模型。这些结果表明刺激-反应-强化物可辨别性对时间测量至关重要。

相似文献

1
Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.跨时间的建模选择:反应-强化物可辨别性的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Jan;117(1):36-52. doi: 10.1002/jeab.723. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.同时性时间表:在先前强化物之后的固定时间内辨别强化物比例的反转。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Sep;100(2):117-34. doi: 10.1002/jeab.43. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
3
Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.并发程序中的偶然辨别力与峰值转移
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):11-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.11-05.
4
Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?强化物的总体比率是否会影响基于时间的应急情况的辨别?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 May;105(3):393-408. doi: 10.1002/jeab.204. Epub 2016 May 6.
5
A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.一种用于在时间和空间上区分强化物的模型。
Behav Processes. 2016 Jun;127:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.刺激与强化物对记忆的控制之间的相互作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):51-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-51.
7
A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.一种用于食物和刺激变化的模型,这些变化标志着基于时间的意外情况变化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Nov;102(3):289-310. doi: 10.1002/jeab.105. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
8
Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.强化比率反转程序中的环境追踪与信号跟随
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:208-224. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.并发日程安排中的局部偏好:强化物序列的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):37-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.114-04.
10
Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.分裂刺激控制:一项复制研究和一个定量模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jul;94(1):13-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the Next Response: Demonstrating the Utility of Integrating Artificial Intelligence-Based Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Science.预测下一个反应:展示将基于人工智能的强化学习与行为科学相结合的效用。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Apr 30;48(2):241-267. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00444-6. eCollection 2025 Jun.