Sturmey P, Crisp A G, Newton T J
Department of Psychology, University of Birmingham, England.
J Ment Defic Res. 1988 Oct;32 ( Pt 5):383-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1988.tb01428.x.
Seven hundred and sixty-eight Social Training Achievement Records were collected independently in two settings during routine assessment of mentally handicapped people, mostly adults in hospital. All scales and total scores were highly internally consistent. Factor analysis on one sample yielded two factors named General Adaptive Behaviour and Community and Equipment Skills. This factor structure was replicated on the second sample. This factor solution is highly similar to that reported for the Adaptive Behavior Scale (Nihira, 1976). Two new scales were derived on the basis of these factor analyses which were also highly internally consistent. Parallel forms of these scales were also satisfactorily developed. Total scores and scores on the two new scales were adequate in routine clinical practice and showed good concurrent and criterion group validities. Reliabilities of individual items were less satisfactory. Suggestions for future developments of this scale are made.
在对智障人士（主要是住院的成年人）进行常规评估期间，于两种不同环境下独立收集了768份社会训练成就记录。所有量表和总分的内部一致性都很高。对一个样本进行因素分析得出了两个因素，分别命名为一般适应性行为以及社区与设备技能。这一因素结构在第二个样本中得到了重复验证。该因素解决方案与《适应行为量表》（Nihira，1976年）所报告的方案高度相似。基于这些因素分析得出了两个新量表，其内部一致性也很高。这些量表的平行形式也得到了令人满意的编制。总分以及两个新量表的得分在常规临床实践中是足够的，并且显示出良好的同时效度和标准组效度。各个项目的信度则不太令人满意。文中还对该量表未来的发展提出了建议。
