Mathias J L, Nettelbeck T
Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
Res Dev Disabil. 1992;13(2):113-29. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90019-3.
Study 1 assessed the construct validity of Greenspan's 1979 and 1981 models of adaptive and social intelligence. Seventy-five adolescents with mental retardation completed four measures of conceptual intelligence, a general measure of adaptive behavior (practical intelligence), and seven measures of social intelligence. A factor analysis of all measures yielded three factors that were obliquely rotated and labelled Practical-Interpersonal Competence (defined by a subset of social intelligence and adaptive behavior measures). Verbal Intelligence, and Accuracy of Inference. An analysis of the seven measures of social intelligence found no evidence to support the hierarchical organization of variables that is proposed in Greenspan's model of social intelligence. The criterion validity of the Practical-Interpersonal Competence construct identified in this study was then assessed in Study 2 (N = 20). Factor scores were calculated from nine measures that were selected to represent the Practical-Interpersonal Competence, Verbal Intelligence, and Accuracy of Inference factors, and correlated with three criterion measures of practical and interpersonal competence. Two of the three criterion measures validated both the Practical-Interpersonal Competence and Verbal Intelligence Factor scores but did not discriminate between the two. The criterion validity of the Practical-Interpersonal Competence construct, therefore, has yet to be established.
研究1评估了格林斯潘1979年和1981年的适应性与社会智力模型的结构效度。75名患有智力障碍的青少年完成了四项概念智力测量、一项适应性行为综合测量（实践智力）以及七项社会智力测量。对所有测量进行的因素分析得出了三个经过斜交旋转的因素，分别标记为实践人际能力（由社会智力和适应性行为测量的一个子集定义）、言语智力和推理准确性。对七项社会智力测量的分析未发现证据支持格林斯潘社会智力模型中所提出的变量层次结构。随后在研究2（N = 20）中评估了本研究中确定的实践人际能力结构的效标效度。从九项测量中计算出因素得分，这些测量被选来代表实践人际能力、言语智力和推理准确性因素，并与实践和人际能力的三项效标测量相关。三项效标测量中的两项验证了实践人际能力和言语智力因素得分，但未对两者进行区分。因此，实践人际能力结构的效标效度尚未确立。
