Patel Aimy T, Lee Brian R, Donegan Ravneet, Humiston Sharon G
University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 May;59(4-5):421-428. doi: 10.1177/0009922820902439. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
This retrospective chart review compared the length of stay (LOS) of families with limited English proficiency (LEP) versus English-speaking families seen in 3 pediatric urgent care centers (PUCCs). Visits were included for patients aged 2 months to 17 years seen between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016, with 1 of 5 primary diagnoses. For each LEP encounter, we randomly selected 3 English-speaking encounters within the same PUCC and diagnosis class. We compared overall LOS between LEP and English-speaking encounters. Of our entire sample, 184 (1.03%) were LEP encounters, of which 145 (78.8%) preferred Spanish. Comparing the LEP visits to 552 matched English-speaking visits, we found a significant difference in average LOS (LEP 85.5 minutes; English-speaking 76.4 minutes) and in prescriptions provided ( = .005) but not in triaged acuity nor number of medications administered, laboratory or radiological studies, or suction treatments. This study serves as a starting point to better care for patients/families with LEP in PUCCs.
这项回顾性病历审查比较了在3家儿科紧急护理中心(PUCCs)就诊的英语水平有限(LEP)家庭与说英语家庭的住院时间(LOS)。纳入的就诊患者年龄在2个月至17岁之间,于2016年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间就诊,主要诊断为5种中的1种。对于每一次LEP就诊,我们在同一PUCC和诊断类别中随机选择3次说英语的就诊。我们比较了LEP就诊和说英语就诊之间的总体住院时间。在我们的整个样本中,184次(1.03%)是LEP就诊,其中145次(78.8%)首选西班牙语。将LEP就诊与552次匹配的说英语就诊进行比较,我们发现平均住院时间存在显著差异(LEP为85.5分钟;说英语的为76.4分钟),在开具的处方方面也存在显著差异(P = 0.005),但在分诊 acuity、给药数量、实验室或放射学检查或吸痰治疗方面没有差异。这项研究是更好地照顾PUCCs中LEP患者/家庭的一个起点。