Waller J A
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.
J Trauma. 1988 Dec;28(12):1632-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198812000-00003.
Studies of trauma patients at clinical facilities commonly are flawed because nothing is known about kinetic or other energy forces causing injuries, and analysis may be limited only to inpatients, with no knowledge about those not injured, those with injuries not requiring treatment, those seen only in the emergency department, or those who died at the scene. Such problems are exacerbated in studies from trauma centers, whose populations reflect additional triage. Where alcohol is involved, acute intoxication may cause erroneous AIS, ISS, and Glasgow Coma Scale ratings based on initial patient assessment. Also, selective differences in frequency of testing for alcohol among different categories of patients can alter results.
临床机构对创伤患者的研究通常存在缺陷,因为对于造成损伤的动力学或其他能量因素一无所知,而且分析可能仅限于住院患者,对未受伤者、受伤但无需治疗者、仅在急诊科就诊者或在现场死亡者情况不明。在创伤中心开展的研究中,这些问题会更加严重,因为其研究对象还存在额外的分诊情况。如果涉及酒精,急性中毒可能会导致基于患者初始评估的简明损伤定级(AIS)、损伤严重度评分(ISS)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分出现错误。此外,不同类别患者在酒精检测频率上的选择性差异也可能改变结果。