Department of Integrated Medical Science, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1307-1312. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16314. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
To describe the causes of 30-day hospital readmissions among high-risk older adults during implementation of a multicomponent care transitions program.
Secondary analysis of data from the evaluation of a multicomponent care transitions program for hospitalized high-risk older adults.
A 400-bed community teaching hospital.
Patients aged 75 and older admitted to non-intensive care unit beds who met specific criteria for high risk of complications and hospital readmissions. The intervention group included 202 patients, of whom 37 were readmitted to the hospital as an inpatient or on observation status within 30 days of discharge.
Root-cause analyses on each readmission were conducted by hospital physicians and post-acute care (PAC) organization staff. Additional data were collected by trained project staff using the medical record and postdischarge telephone or in-person follow-up visits. These data were reviewed and adjudicated among the authors, and each readmission was rated with unanimous agreement as "preventable," "possibly preventable," or "not preventable."
No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics of intervention patients readmitted versus those not readmitted. A higher proportion of the 37 patients who were readmitted did not have a postdischarge visit than the 165 patients who were not readmitted (15 [41%] vs 45 [27%]; P = .11). Among the 37 readmissions, 14 (38%) were rated as not preventable, 14 (38%) as possibly preventable, and 9 (24%) as preventable. Readmissions were rated as preventable or possibly preventable for a variety of reasons that provide insight into how care transitions programs for high-risk older adults might be made more effective.
Root-cause analyses of hospital readmissions among high-risk older adults by hospital physicians and PAC providers can identify strategies that might enhance the effectiveness of care transitions interventions in this complex population. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1307-1312, 2020.
描述在实施多组分护理过渡计划期间,高危老年人 30 天内住院再入院的原因。
对一项针对住院高危老年人的多组分护理过渡计划的评估数据进行二次分析。
一家 400 张床位的社区教学医院。
年龄在 75 岁及以上,入住非重症监护病房床位,符合并发症和住院再入院高风险特定标准的患者。干预组包括 202 名患者,其中 37 名在出院后 30 天内再次以住院或观察状态入院。
医院医生和康复后护理(PAC)组织工作人员对每次再入院进行根本原因分析。经过培训的项目工作人员使用病历和出院后电话或面对面随访收集其他数据。作者对这些数据进行了回顾和裁决,每次再入院都经一致同意评定为“可预防”、“可能可预防”或“不可预防”。
再入院与未再入院的干预患者在人口统计学和临床特征方面无显著差异。与未再入院的 165 名患者相比,再入院的 37 名患者中没有接受出院后访视的比例更高(15 [41%] vs 45 [27%];P = 0.11)。在 37 次再入院中,14 次(38%)被评定为不可预防,14 次(38%)为可能可预防,9 次(24%)为可预防。对高危老年人的医院再入院进行根本原因分析,可以确定如何使高危老年人的护理过渡计划更加有效的策略。
医院医生和 PAC 提供者对高危老年人的医院再入院进行根本原因分析,可以确定如何使针对这一复杂人群的护理过渡干预更加有效的策略。美国老年学会杂志 68:1307-1312,2020。