Department of Psychiatry, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;65(6):409-417. doi: 10.1177/0706743720902616. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is associated with increased risk of criminal justice involvement and repeated victimization among homeless individuals. This study aimed to (1) examine whether the relationship between cumulative ACE score and odds of experiencing criminal justice involvement and victimization remains significant over time after receiving the Housing First (HF) intervention and (2) investigate the moderating effect of cumulative ACE score on the effectiveness of the HF intervention on the likelihood of experiencing these outcomes among homeless individuals with mental illnesses.
We used longitudinal data over the 2-year follow-up period from the At Home/ demonstration project that provided HF versus treatment as usual (TAU) to homeless adults with mental illness in five Canadian cities (N = 1,888).
In all 4 follow-up time points, the relationship between cumulative ACE score and both outcomes remained significant, regardless of study arm (HF vs. TAU) and other confounding factors. However, cumulative ACE score did not moderate intervention effects on odds of experiencing either outcome, suggesting that the effectiveness of HF versus TAU, with regard to the odds of being victimized or criminal justice involvement, did not differ by cumulative ACE scores over the course of study.
Findings suggest that providing services for homeless individuals with mental illness should be trauma informed and include specialized treatment strategies targeting the experience of ACEs and trauma to improve their treatment outcomes. An intensive approach is required to directly address the problem of criminal justice involvement and victimization in these individuals.
遭受不良童年经历(ACEs)与无家可归者卷入刑事司法系统和遭受反复侵害的风险增加有关。本研究旨在:(1) 检验在接受“先住后付(HF)”干预后,累积 ACE 评分与经历刑事司法卷入和受害的几率之间的关系是否随着时间的推移仍然显著;(2) 调查累积 ACE 评分对 HF 干预效果的调节作用,即在有精神疾病的无家可归者中,这些结果的可能性。
我们使用了来自五个加拿大城市的 At Home/示范项目的 2 年随访期间的纵向数据,该项目为有精神疾病的无家可归成年人提供 HF 与常规治疗(TAU)相比。
在所有 4 个随访时间点,累积 ACE 评分与这两个结果之间的关系仍然显著,无论研究组(HF 与 TAU)和其他混杂因素如何。然而,累积 ACE 评分并没有调节干预效果对经历任何结果的几率,这表明 HF 与 TAU 相比,在研究过程中,累积 ACE 评分对受害或刑事司法卷入的几率没有差异。
研究结果表明,为有精神疾病的无家可归者提供服务应该以创伤为中心,并包括专门针对 ACEs 和创伤经历的治疗策略,以改善他们的治疗效果。需要采取强化方法来直接解决这些人卷入刑事司法系统和受害的问题。