Suppr超能文献

用于采用固体电极和氧化还原流体的有机材料基储能装置的电解质的比较综述。

A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic-Material-Based Energy-Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids.

作者信息

Chen Ruiyong, Bresser Dominic, Saraf Mohit, Gerlach Patrick, Balducci Andrea, Kunz Simon, Schröder Daniel, Passerini Stefano, Chen Jun

机构信息

Transfercenter Sustainable Electrochemistry, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU), 89081, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

ChemSusChem. 2020 May 8;13(9):2205-2219. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201903382. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Abstract

Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy-storage device. Low-cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox-active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal-based active materials. Organic active materials can be used not only as solid electrodes in the classic lithium-ion battery (LIB) setup, but also as redox fluids in redox-flow batteries (RFBs). Accordingly, they have suitability for mobile and stationary applications, respectively. Herein, different types of electrolytes, recent advances for designing better performing electrolytes, and remaining scientific challenges are discussed and summarized. Due to different configurations and requirements between LIBs and RFBs, the similarities and differences for choosing suitable electrolytes are discussed. Both general and specific strategies for promoting the utilization of organic active materials are covered.

摘要

电解质化学对于任何储能设备都至关重要。基于有机氧化还原活性材料的低成本且可持续的可充电电池,对于解决当前基于金属活性材料的电池在资源和性能方面的局限性具有重大意义。有机活性材料不仅可以用作传统锂离子电池(LIB)装置中的固体电极,还可以用作氧化还原液流电池(RFB)中的氧化还原流体。因此,它们分别适用于移动和固定应用。本文讨论并总结了不同类型的电解质、设计性能更优电解质的最新进展以及尚存的科学挑战。由于LIB和RFB的配置和要求不同,文中讨论了选择合适电解质的异同点。还涵盖了促进有机活性材料利用的一般策略和具体策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/071d/7318708/ba9aabbd5796/CSSC-13-2205-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验