Suppr超能文献

急性心源性肺水肿患者临床谱内静脉血管扩张剂的获益与危害。

Benefit and harm of intravenous vasodilators across the clinical profile spectrum in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema patients.

机构信息

Tokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Aug;9(5):448-458. doi: 10.1177/2048872619891075. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The absence of high quality, large-scale data that indicates definitive mortality benefits does not allow for firm conclusions on the role of intravenous vasodilators in acute heart failure. We aimed to investigate the associations between intravenous vasodilators and clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients, with a specific focus on patient profiles and type of vasodilators.

METHODS

Data of 26,212 consecutive patients urgently hospitalised for a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure between 2009 and 2015 were extracted from a government-funded multicentre data registration system. Propensity scores were calculated with multiple imputations and 1:1 matching performed between patients with and without vasodilator use. The primary endpoint was inhospital mortality.

RESULTS

On direct comparison of the vasodilator and non-vasodilator groups after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the inhospital mortality rates (7.5% vs. 8.8%, respectively; =0.098) or length of intensive/cardiovascular care unit stay and hospital stay between the two groups. However, there was a substantial difference in baseline systolic blood pressure by vasodilator type; favourable impacts of vasodilator use on inhospital mortality were observed among patients who had higher systolic blood pressures and those who had no atrial fibrillation on admission. Furthermore, when compared to nitrates, the use of carperitide (natriuretic peptide agent) was significantly associated with worse outcomes, especially in patients with intermediate systolic blood pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

In acute heart failure patients, vasodilator use was not universally associated with improved inhospital outcomes; rather, its effect depended on individual clinical presentation: patients with higher systolic blood pressure and no atrial fibrillation seemed to benefit maximally from vasodilators.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR identifier, UMIN000013128.

摘要

背景

缺乏高质量、大规模的数据表明静脉血管扩张剂在急性心力衰竭中有明确的生存获益,因此无法确定其作用。我们旨在研究静脉血管扩张剂与急性心力衰竭患者临床结局之间的关系,并特别关注患者特征和血管扩张剂类型。

方法

从一个政府资助的多中心数据登记系统中提取了 2009 年至 2015 年间因急性心力衰竭初次住院的 26212 例连续患者的数据。采用多重插补和 1:1 匹配计算倾向评分,并在使用和不使用血管扩张剂的患者之间进行比较。主要终点为住院期间死亡率。

结果

在倾向评分匹配后直接比较血管扩张剂组和非血管扩张剂组,两组的住院期间死亡率(分别为 7.5%和 8.8%;=0.098)或重症监护/心血管病房和住院时间无显著差异。然而,血管扩张剂类型的基线收缩压存在显著差异;在入院时收缩压较高和无心房颤动的患者中,血管扩张剂的使用对住院期间死亡率有有利影响。此外,与硝酸盐相比,使用培哚普利(利钠肽制剂)与较差的结局显著相关,尤其是在收缩压中等的患者中。

结论

在急性心力衰竭患者中,血管扩张剂的使用并不普遍与改善住院结局相关;相反,其效果取决于个体临床表现:收缩压较高且无心房颤动的患者可能从血管扩张剂中获益最大。

试验注册

UMIN-CTR 标识符,UMIN000013128。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验