Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):219-25. doi: 10.1177/2048872613492440.
To examine the use of the treatments for acute heart failure (AHF) recommended by ESC guidelines in different clinical presentations and blood pressure groups.
The use of intravenous diuretics, nitrates, opioids, inotropes, and vasopressors as well as non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was analysed in 620 patients hospitalized due to AHF. The relation between AHF therapies and clinical presentation, especially systolic blood pressure (SBP) on admission, was also assessed.
Overall, 76% of patients received i.v. furosemide, 42% nitrates, 29% opioids, 5% inotropes and 7% vasopressors, and 24% of patients were treated with NIV. Furosemide was the most common treatment in all clinical classes and irrespective of SBP on admission. Nitrates were given most often in pulmonary oedema and hypertensive AHF. Overall, only SBP differed significantly between patients with and without the studied treatments. SBP was higher in patients treated with nitrates than in those who were not (156 vs. 141 mmHg, p<0.001). Still, only one-third of patients presenting acute decompensated heart failure and SBP over 120 mmHg were given nitrates. Inotropes and vasopressors were given most frequently in cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema, and their use was inversely related to initial SBP (p<0.001). NIV was used only in half of the cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema patients.
The management of AHF differs between ESC clinical classes and the use of i.v. vasoactive therapies is related to the initial SBP. However, there seems to be room for improvement in administration of vasodilators and NIV.
研究 ESC 指南推荐的急性心力衰竭(AHF)治疗方法在不同临床表现和血压组中的应用。
对因 AHF 住院的 620 例患者进行静脉利尿剂、硝酸酯类、阿片类药物、正性肌力药和血管加压素以及无创通气(NIV)的使用分析。还评估了 AHF 治疗方法与临床表现之间的关系,特别是入院时的收缩压(SBP)。
总体而言,76%的患者接受了静脉注射呋塞米,42%接受了硝酸酯类,29%接受了阿片类药物,5%接受了正性肌力药,7%接受了血管加压素,24%的患者接受了 NIV。在所有临床类别和入院时 SBP 不论高低,呋塞米都是最常用的治疗药物。硝酸酯类药物在肺水肿和高血压性 AHF 中最常使用。总体而言,只有 SBP 在接受和未接受研究治疗的患者之间有显著差异。接受硝酸酯类治疗的患者 SBP 高于未接受治疗的患者(156 与 141mmHg,p<0.001)。然而,只有三分之一的急性失代偿性心力衰竭和 SBP 超过 120mmHg 的患者接受了硝酸酯类药物。正性肌力药和血管加压素在心源性休克和肺水肿中最常使用,其使用与初始 SBP 呈反比(p<0.001)。只有一半的心源性休克和肺水肿患者使用了 NIV。
AHF 的管理在 ESC 临床类别之间存在差异,静脉血管活性治疗的使用与初始 SBP 相关。然而,在血管扩张剂和 NIV 的应用方面似乎还有改进的空间。