• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性创伤性脑损伤的计算机断层扫描严重程度分级量表的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver Agreement for the Computed Tomography Severity Grading Scales for Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 15;37(12):1445-1451. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6871. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2019.6871
PMID:31996087
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver variability among providers of different specialties and levels of experience across five established computed tomography (CT) scoring systems for acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). One hundred cases were selected at random from a retrospective population of adult patients transported to our emergency department and subjected to a non-contrast head CT due to suspicion of TBI. Eight neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons in trainee (residents and fellows) and attending roles independently scored each non-contrast head CT scan on the Marshall, Rotterdam, Helsinki, Stockholm, and NeuroImaging Radiological Interpretation System (NIRIS) head CT scales. Interobserver variability of scale scores-overall and by specialty and level of training-was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and agreement with respect to National Institutes of Health Common Data Elements (NIH CDEs) was assessed using Cohen's kappa. All CT severity scoring systems showed high interobserver agreement as evidenced by high ICCs, ranging from 0.75-0.89. For all scoring systems, neuroradiologists (ICC range from 0.81-0.94) tended to have higher interobserver agreement than neurosurgeons (ICC range from 0.63-0.76). For all scoring systems, attendings (ICC range from 0.76-0.89) had similar interobserver agreement to trainees (ICC range from 0.73-0.89). Agreement with respect to NIH CDEs was high for ascertaining presence/absence of hemorrhage, skull fracture, and mass effect, with estimated kappa statistics of least 0.89. Acute TBI CT scoring systems demonstrate high interobserver agreement. These results provide scientific rigor for future use of these systems for the classification of acute TBI.

摘要

本研究旨在确定不同专业和经验水平的提供者在五个已建立的急性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)计算机断层扫描(CT)评分系统中的观察者间变异性。从我们急诊部因疑似 TBI 而接受非对比头部 CT 的成年患者的回顾性人群中随机选择了 100 例。8 名神经放射科医生和神经外科医生以受训者(住院医师和研究员)和主治医生的身份独立对每个非对比头部 CT 扫描进行评分,使用 Marshall、Rotterdam、Helsinki、Stockholm 和神经影像学放射学解释系统(NIRIS)头部 CT 量表。使用组内相关系数(ICC)量化了量表评分的观察者间变异性(总体和按专业和培训水平),并使用 NIH 常见数据元素(NIH CDE)评估了与 Cohen's kappa 的一致性。所有 CT 严重程度评分系统均显示出高度的观察者间一致性,ICC 较高,范围为 0.75-0.89。对于所有评分系统,神经放射科医生(ICC 范围为 0.81-0.94)的观察者间一致性高于神经外科医生(ICC 范围为 0.63-0.76)。对于所有评分系统,主治医生(ICC 范围为 0.76-0.89)与受训者(ICC 范围为 0.73-0.89)的观察者间一致性相似。对于确定是否存在出血、颅骨骨折和肿块效应,NIH CDE 的一致性较高,估计kappa 统计量至少为 0.89。急性 TBI CT 评分系统显示出高度的观察者间一致性。这些结果为未来使用这些系统对急性 TBI 进行分类提供了科学依据。

相似文献

1
Interobserver Agreement for the Computed Tomography Severity Grading Scales for Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.急性创伤性脑损伤的计算机断层扫描严重程度分级量表的观察者间一致性。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 15;37(12):1445-1451. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6871. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Neuroimaging Radiological Interpretation System for Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.神经影像学放射性损伤解读系统在急性创伤性脑损伤中的应用。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Nov 15;35(22):2665-2672. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5311. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
3
Validation of a deep learning model for traumatic brain injury detection and NIRIS grading on non-contrast CT: a multi-reader study with promising results and opportunities for improvement.深度学习模型在非对比 CT 上检测创伤性脑损伤和 NIRIS 分级的验证:一项多读者研究,结果有前景,有改进的机会。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Nov;65(11):1605-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03170-5. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
4
Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging features of traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤 CT 成像特征评估中的观察者间变异性。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Feb;27(2):325-30. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1115.
5
Evaluation of novel computerized tomography scoring systems in human traumatic brain injury: An observational, multicenter study.新型计算机断层扫描评分系统在人类创伤性脑损伤中的评估:一项观察性多中心研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 3;14(8):e1002368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002368. eCollection 2017 Aug.
6
Comparison of the predictive value of the Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting 6-month outcomes in patients with blunt traumatic brain injuries.比较赫尔辛基、鹿特丹和斯德哥尔摩 CT 评分在预测钝性颅脑损伤患者 6 个月结局中的预测价值。
Chin J Traumatol. 2023 Nov;26(6):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Demographics and clinical characteristics of acute traumatic brain injury patients in the different Neuroimaging Radiological Interpretation System (NIRIS) categories.不同神经影像学解读系统(NIRIS)分类的急性创伤性脑损伤患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
J Neuroradiol. 2021 Mar;48(2):104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Accuracy of head computed tomography scoring systems in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A ProTECT III ancillary study.头部计算机断层扫描评分系统对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者结局预测的准确性:一项 PROTECT III 辅助研究。
Neuroradiol J. 2023 Feb;36(1):38-48. doi: 10.1177/19714009221101313. Epub 2022 May 9.
9
Reliability of the NINDS common data elements cranial tomography (CT) rating variables for traumatic brain injury (TBI).美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所(NINDS)创伤性脑损伤(TBI)常用数据元素头颅计算机断层扫描(CT)评级变量的可靠性。
Brain Inj. 2017;31(2):174-184. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1225989. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
10
Comparative study of computed tomographic scoring systems and predictors of early mortality in severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤中 CT 评分系统与早期死亡率预测因素的对比研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Aug;66:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Helsinki computed tomography score in predicting short- and long-term outcomes after primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.赫尔辛基计算机断层扫描评分在预测创伤性脑损伤初次减压性颅骨切除术后的短期和长期预后中的应用
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Feb 21;48(1):258. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03410-7.
2
Comparing Predictive Utility of Head Computed Tomography Scan-Based Scoring Systems for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study.比较基于头部计算机断层扫描的创伤性脑损伤评分系统的预测效用:一项回顾性研究。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 29;13(8):1145. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081145.
3
Validation of a deep learning model for traumatic brain injury detection and NIRIS grading on non-contrast CT: a multi-reader study with promising results and opportunities for improvement.
深度学习模型在非对比 CT 上检测创伤性脑损伤和 NIRIS 分级的验证:一项多读者研究,结果有前景,有改进的机会。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Nov;65(11):1605-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03170-5. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
4
Chinese Admission Warning Strategy for Predicting the Hospital Discharge Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.用于预测创伤性脑损伤患者出院结局的中文入院预警策略。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 13;11(4):974. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040974.