Endurance Performance Research Group (GEDAE-USP), School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):1423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58253-7.
The aim of this study was to develop predictive equations for minute ventilation based on heart rate, and to test the precision of the equations in two forms of endurance exercise. Eighteen men (age 27.8 ± 5.4 years old, maximal oxygen uptake 45.4 ± 8.3 ml·kg·min) performed a maximal progressive cycle test in which minute ventilation and heart rate were continually measured and further used to establish the proposed equations with quadratic and exponential adjustments. In the second and third laboratory visits, sixteen participants completed two cycling bouts, one high-intensity interval exercise and one low-intensity continuous exercise. The minute ventilation and heart rate were measured in both exercises and the validity of the equations tested. The Bland-Altman analysis showed agreement between the minute ventilation and estimated equations for interval and continuous exercise. There was no difference between the minute ventilation obtained from both equations and the minute ventilation directly measured during the interval exercise. However, the quadratic equation underestimated the minute ventilation during continuous exercise (p < 0.05). While both equations seem to be suitable to estimate minute ventilation during high-intensity interval exercise, the exponential equation is recommended for low-intensity continuous exercise.
本研究旨在基于心率开发预测分钟通气量的方程,并在两种耐力运动形式中测试方程的精度。18 名男性(年龄 27.8±5.4 岁,最大摄氧量 45.4±8.3ml·kg·min)进行了最大递增式踏车测试,在此期间持续测量分钟通气量和心率,并进一步使用二次和指数调整来建立拟议的方程。在第二和第三次实验室访问中,16 名参与者完成了两次踏车运动,一次是高强度间歇运动,一次是低强度持续运动。在两种运动中测量了分钟通气量和心率,并测试了方程的有效性。Bland-Altman 分析显示,间歇运动和连续运动中,分钟通气量与估算方程之间存在一致性。两种方程在间歇运动中获得的分钟通气量与直接测量的分钟通气量之间没有差异。然而,在连续运动中,二次方程低估了分钟通气量(p<0.05)。虽然两种方程似乎都适合估计高强度间歇运动中的分钟通气量,但推荐在低强度持续运动中使用指数方程。