• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRCA 致病性变异携带者长期临床管理的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of long-term clinical management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers.

机构信息

Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.

The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2020 May;22(5):831-839. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0751-3. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-020-0751-3
PMID:31996782
Abstract

PURPOSE

Women who inherit a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant are at high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of long-term management in clinical practice is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world cost-effectiveness of BRCA carrier management within a structured clinical program.

METHODS

Lifetime health outcomes and costs of clinical management for female unaffected BRCA carriers aged 20 were measured using a microsimulation model. For the intervention, women could attend a high-risk clinic, undergo risk-reducing surgery, and receive annual breast screening. Input data for the model was from a clinical database of 983 BRCA carriers. The comparator was no risk management. Outcomes were discounted at 5%.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the program was $32,359 to $48,263 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Limiting uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy to <50% of carriers decreased cost-effectiveness by $7000-8000 per QALY. Achieving perfect adherence to guidelines was less cost-effective for BRCA2 due to increased risk-reducing mastectomy costs with smaller incremental health benefit.

CONCLUSION

Long-term management of BRCA carriers within a structured clinical program is cost-effective. Suboptimal adherence to risk management guidelines can substantially affect outcomes and is an important consideration for future studies.

摘要

目的

携带 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 致病性变异的女性罹患乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险很高。缺乏临床实践中长期管理有效性和成本效益的证据。本研究旨在评估在结构化临床方案中进行 BRCA 携带者管理的真实世界成本效益。

方法

使用微观模拟模型测量 20 岁无影响 BRCA 携带者的终生健康结果和临床管理成本。对于干预措施,女性可以参加高危诊所、进行降低风险的手术并接受年度乳房筛查。模型的输入数据来自 983 名 BRCA 携带者的临床数据库。比较组为无风险管理。结果以 5%贴现。

结果

该计划的增量成本效益比为每质量调整生命年(QALY)$32359 至 $48263。将预防性输卵管卵巢切除术的使用率限制在<50%的携带者,可使每 QALY 的成本效益降低 7000-8000 美元。由于降低风险的乳房切除术成本增加,BRCA2 达到完美的依从性指导方针的成本效益较低,而健康获益增量较小。

结论

在结构化临床方案中对 BRCA 携带者进行长期管理具有成本效益。风险管理指南的依从性不理想会对结果产生重大影响,这是未来研究的一个重要考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of long-term clinical management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers.BRCA 致病性变异携带者长期临床管理的成本效益。
Genet Med. 2020 May;22(5):831-839. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0751-3. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Cost-effectiveness of preventive strategies for women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation.携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变女性的预防策略的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):397-406. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00006.
3
Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing in Canada.基于人群的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 检测在加拿大的经济评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432725. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32725.
4
Canadian cost-effectiveness model of BRCA-driven surgical prevention of breast/ovarian cancers compared to treatment if cancer develops.加拿大基于 BRCA 驱动的乳腺癌/卵巢癌手术预防与癌症发生后治疗的成本效益模型比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):104-112. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319003519.
5
A Microsimulation Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Risk Management for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers: miBRovaCAre.用于评估 BRCA 致病性变异携带者癌症风险管理效果的微观模拟模型:miBRovaCAre。
Value Health. 2019 Aug;22(8):854-862. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
Prophylactic salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for BRCA mutation carriers.预防性输卵管切除术和延迟卵巢切除术作为 BRCA 基因突变携带者的替代方案。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):14-24. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182783c2f.
7
Decision-analytic evaluation of the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in German women with BRCA-1/2 mutations.BRCA1/2 突变携带者的乳腺癌和卵巢癌预防策略的比较效果和成本效益的决策分析评估。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 26;23(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10956-6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.与基于家族史检测相比,对阿什肯纳兹犹太妇女进行BRCA突变群体筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 30;107(1):380. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju380. Print 2015 Jan.
9
Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者的监测和预防策略的成本效益分析。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Mar;25(2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0803-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in German women with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation.BRCA1 或 2 基因突变的德国女性中不同策略预防乳腺癌和卵巢癌的成本效益分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Apr;19(3):341-353. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0887-5. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model.通过靶向基因检测降低乳腺癌和卵巢癌发病率:使用NEEMO微观模拟模型的估计
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;16(24):4165. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244165.
2
Prevalence and spectrum of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a cohort of ovarian cancer patients from the Salento peninsula (Southern Italy): a matter of preventive health.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系突变在来自意大利南部萨伦托半岛(Salento peninsula)的卵巢癌患者队列中的流行率和谱:预防保健问题。
Oncotarget. 2024 Feb 22;15:134-141. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28561.
3
Ten-Year Follow-Up of Women at High Risk for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Otago and Southland, New Zealand.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.女性 BRCA 相关癌症的风险评估、遗传咨询和基因检测:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):271-81. doi: 10.7326/M13-2747.
新西兰奥塔哥和南地妇女高乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族风险的 10 年随访。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):3-7. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.1.3.
4
A cost-utility analysis of and testing in high-risk breast cancer patients and family members in Thailand: a cost-effective policy in resource-limited settings.在泰国高危乳腺癌患者及其家属中进行和检测的成本效用分析:资源有限环境下具有成本效益的政策。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;11:1257668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1257668. eCollection 2023.
5
"There should be one spot that you can go:" BRCA mutation carriers' perspectives on cancer risk management and a hereditary cancer registry.“应该有一个你可以去的地方”:BRCA 突变携带者对癌症风险管理和遗传性癌症登记处的看法。
J Community Genet. 2024 Feb;15(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00685-5. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
6
Germline BRCA testing in pancreatic cancer: improving awareness, timing, turnaround, and uptake.胰腺癌中的胚系BRCA检测:提高认知度、检测时机、周转效率及接受度。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Sep 15;15:17588359231189127. doi: 10.1177/17588359231189127. eCollection 2023.
7
The Difference Method Approach for Sampling Order Constrained Parameters: An Improved Implementation and Important Limitations.采样顺序约束参数的差分方法方法:改进的实现和重要限制。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jan;42(1):11-18. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01313-3. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
8
Development of a person-centred digital platform for the long-term support of people living with an adult-onset genetic disease predisposition: a mixed-methods study protocol.以患者为中心的数字平台用于为成年发病遗传疾病倾向者提供长期支持的开发:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e071492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071492.
9
Longitudinal adherence to breast cancer surveillance following cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system.在综合医疗体系中进行癌症基因检测后,对乳腺癌监测的长期依从性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Oct;201(3):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07007-w. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
10
Evaluation of disparities in perceived healthcare discrimination among -positive women from medically underserved populations.评价医疗资源匮乏人群中 HIV 阳性女性感知到的医疗保健歧视差距。
Women Health. 2023 Aug 9;63(7):539-550. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2023.2237610. Epub 2023 Jul 18.