Department of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Jul;64(6):735-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.13554. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Pain and discomfort during the awake phase in awake craniotomy should be relieved to facilitate brain mapping. Although some anaesthesiologists use low-dose (0.01-0.05 µg/kg/min) remifentanil infusion to provide analgesia during this phase, its efficacy and side effects have never been evaluated. Therefore, this study primarily aimed to investigate the effects of low-dose remifentanil infusion on the need for antiemetic treatment during brain mapping and secondarily aimed to determine its effects on the need for additional analgesic treatment.
This retrospective study included 218 patients who underwent awake craniotomy at our centre from 2008 to 2018. The relationship between low-dose remifentanil infusion during the awake phase and the requirement for analgesic or antiemetic treatment was examined. A multivariable competing risk regression analysis was performed to adjust for patient and operative variables.
Sixty-six patients (30.3%) received low-dose (median rate: 0.01 µg/kg/min) remifentanil infusion during the awake phase. Forty-nine patients (22.5%) received an antiemetic and 99 (45.4%) received additional analgesic treatment. The difference in additional analgesic treatment was not significant between patients who received low-dose remifentanil infusion and those who did not (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.70; P = .570); however, the use of antiemetics significantly increased in patients who received remifentanil (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-3.15; P = .047).
Low-dose remifentanil infusion during the awake phase in awake craniotomy significantly increased the need for antiemetics but did not decrease the need for additional analgesic treatment.
在清醒开颅术中,清醒阶段的疼痛和不适应得到缓解,以方便脑图绘制。尽管一些麻醉师在这一阶段使用低剂量(0.01-0.05 µg/kg/min)瑞芬太尼输注来提供镇痛,但它的疗效和副作用从未得到过评估。因此,本研究主要旨在探讨低剂量瑞芬太尼输注对脑图绘制期间抗恶心治疗需求的影响,其次旨在确定其对额外镇痛治疗需求的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2008 年至 2018 年在我们中心接受清醒开颅术的 218 名患者。考察了清醒阶段低剂量瑞芬太尼输注与镇痛或止吐治疗需求之间的关系。采用多变量竞争风险回归分析,对患者和手术变量进行了调整。
66 名患者(30.3%)在清醒期接受了低剂量(中位数:0.01 µg/kg/min)瑞芬太尼输注。49 名患者(22.5%)接受了止吐治疗,99 名患者(45.4%)接受了额外的镇痛治疗。接受低剂量瑞芬太尼输注的患者与未接受低剂量瑞芬太尼输注的患者在接受额外镇痛治疗方面差异无统计学意义(调整后的危险比:1.13;95%置信区间:0.75-1.70;P = 0.570);然而,接受瑞芬太尼的患者使用止吐药的比例显著增加(调整后的危险比:1.78;95%置信区间:1.01-3.15;P = 0.047)。
在清醒开颅术中,清醒阶段的低剂量瑞芬太尼输注显著增加了抗恶心药物的需求,但并没有降低额外镇痛治疗的需求。