Suppr超能文献

年轻成年水烟烟民对水烟烟草加热源危害的认知。

Perceived Harms of Waterpipe Tobacco Heating Sources Among Young Adult Waterpipe Tobacco Smokers.

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2020 Apr;47(2):293-301. doi: 10.1177/1090198119894964. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

Abstract

. Waterpipe tobacco smoking is associated with many negative health outcomes due to toxicants produced by heating the tobacco using charcoal or electrical heaters. Little is known about how young adult waterpipe tobacco smokers perceive harms of these heating sources. . To examine young adult waterpipe tobacco smokers' perceived harms of electrical heaters and charcoal to heat waterpipe tobacco. . This online cross-sectional study enrolled 18- to 32-year-olds who smoked waterpipe tobacco within the past 30 days. Participants completed measures assessing, for each heating source, amount and knowledge of toxicants released (e.g., carbon monoxide, cancer-causing chemicals), perceived safety, worry about inhaling toxicants, perceived health risk, desire to quit, and intention to smoke in the next month. Question order for knowledge of and perceived harms was counterbalanced for each heating source. . Analyses were based on responses from 199 participants. Perceived harms for both heating sources were average to low. Despite some question order effects, participants viewed charcoal as more harmful than electrical heaters. Participants knew more about chemicals released from charcoal than electrical heaters. Greater knowledge of chemicals released by both heating sources correlated positively with perceived harms. Perceived harms were associated with a stronger desire to quit, yet unrelated with likelihood of smoking waterpipe during the next month. . Many young adult waterpipe tobacco smokers view charcoal as more harmful than electrical heaters, although knowledge about harms for each heating source is poor. . Interventions are needed to inform the public about harms of waterpipe heating sources in order to curb use.

摘要

水烟烟草吸烟与许多负面健康结果有关,因为加热烟草使用木炭或电加热器会产生有毒物质。对于年轻人如何看待这些加热源的危害,知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨年轻人对水烟烟草电加热器和木炭加热源的感知危害。

本在线横断面研究招募了过去 30 天内吸过水烟烟草的 18 至 32 岁人群。参与者完成了评估每种加热源的措施,包括释放的有毒物质的数量和知识(例如一氧化碳、致癌化学物质)、感知安全性、对吸入有毒物质的担忧、感知健康风险、戒烟意愿以及下个月吸烟的意愿。每个加热源的知识和感知危害的问题顺序是平衡的。

分析基于 199 名参与者的回答。两种加热源的感知危害均为中等至低度。尽管存在一些问题顺序效应,但参与者认为木炭比电加热器更有害。参与者对木炭释放的化学物质的了解多于电加热器。对两种加热源释放的化学物质的了解越多,与感知危害呈正相关。感知危害与更强的戒烟意愿相关,但与下个月吸用水烟的可能性无关。

许多年轻人吸用水烟烟草者认为木炭比电加热器更有害,尽管对每种加热源的危害了解甚少。需要开展干预措施,使公众了解水烟加热源的危害,以遏制其使用。

相似文献

6

本文引用的文献

4
5
An introduction to the electronic waterpipe.电子水烟管简介。
Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验