Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jan 10;9:420. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00420. eCollection 2019.
Gallinarum only infects avian species, where it causes a severe systemic infection in birds of all ages. It is generally accepted that interaction with phagocytic cells plays an important role in the development of systemic, host-specific infections. The current study detailed the interaction of . Gallinarum with macrophages derived from chicken (HD11) and cattle (Bomac) compared to interaction of the broad host range serovar, Typhimurium and the cattle adapted serovar Dublin. Results showed a weaker invading ability of . Gallinarum in both kinds of macrophages, regardless whether the bacteria were opsonized or not before infections. However, opsonization of . Gallinarum by chicken serum increased its intracellular survival rate in chicken macrophages. No significant induction of nitrogen oxide was observed in the infected HD11 cells within the first 6 h, and levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were similar among the three serovars. . Gallinarum infection was associated with low cell deaths in both chicken and cattle macrophages, whereas . Dublin only induced a comparable high level of cell death in chicken macrophages, but not in macrophages of its preferred host species (Bomac) compared to host generalist . Typhimurium. . Gallinarum-infected HD11 macrophages exhibited low induction of pro-inflammation genes [interleukin (IL)1β, CXCLi1, and CXCLi2] compared to the two other serovars, and contrary to the other serovars, it did not induce significant downregulation of Toll-like receptor (TLR)2, TLR4, and TLR5. In infection of 1-week-old chicken, a significant upregulation of the TLR4 and TLR5 genes in the spleen was observed in . Gallinarum-infected chickens, but not in . Typhimurium-infected chicken at 5 days post-infections. Taken together, results show that . Gallinarum infection of macrophages was characterized by low uptake and low cytotoxicity, possibly allowing long-term persistence in the intracellular environment, and it caused a low induction of pro-inflammatory responses.
鸡白痢仅感染禽类,在各年龄段的鸟类中引起严重的全身感染。普遍认为,与吞噬细胞的相互作用在宿主特异性全身感染的发展中起着重要作用。本研究详细描述了. Gallinarum 与鸡源性巨噬细胞(HD11)和牛源性巨噬细胞(Bomac)的相互作用,与广泛宿主范围血清型. Typhimurium 和牛适应血清型. Dublin 的相互作用进行了比较。结果表明,无论感染前细菌是否被调理,. Gallinarum 在两种巨噬细胞中的侵袭能力都较弱。然而,鸡血清调理. Gallinarum 可提高其在鸡巨噬细胞中的胞内存活率。在最初的 6 小时内,感染的 HD11 细胞中未观察到明显的一氧化氮诱导,三种血清型之间的活性氧(ROS)水平相似。. Gallinarum 感染与两种巨噬细胞中的低细胞死亡率相关,而. Dublin 仅在鸡巨噬细胞中诱导可比的高水平细胞死亡,但与其首选宿主种(Bomac)的巨噬细胞相比,不如宿主普遍型. Typhimurium 。. Gallinarum 感染的 HD11 巨噬细胞表现出低诱导促炎基因 [白细胞介素(IL)1β、CXCLi1 和 CXCLi2],与其他两种血清型相比,与其他两种血清型相反,它不会诱导 TLR2、TLR4 和 TLR5 的显著下调。在 1 周龄鸡的. Gallinarum 感染中,感染鸡的脾脏中 TLR4 和 TLR5 基因显著上调,但在 5 天感染后的. Typhimurium 感染鸡中未观察到。总之,结果表明,. Gallinarum 感染巨噬细胞的特征是摄取量低和细胞毒性低,可能允许其在细胞内环境中长期存在,并引起低水平的促炎反应诱导。