Suppr超能文献

特发性声门下狭窄的内镜治疗:一项系统评价

Endoscopic Treatment of Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Lavrysen Emilie, Hens Greet, Delaere Pierre, Meulemans Jeroen

机构信息

Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2020 Jan 10;6:75. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00075. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

To identify different endoscopic techniques for treatment of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) and evaluate treatment results. Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on endoscopically treated iSGS. Identified interventions included procedures with cold knife, dilation (rigid or balloon), or laser (CO or Nd:YAG), used in several combinations and supplemented with mitomycin C and/or corticosteroids. Primary endpoint was time interval between successive endoscopic procedures. Secondary endpoints were stenosis recurrence rate, total number of interventions per patient during follow-up, tracheotomy rate, and rate of open surgery. Eighty-six abstracts were reviewed and 15 series were included in the analysis. Mean sample size was 57 subjects (range 10-384, σ 90.84) and mean age was 47 years (range 36-54, σ 4.45). Time interval ranged from 2 to 21 months [weighted mean (WM): 12]. Rate of stenosis recurrence ranged from 40 to 100% (WM: 68%). Mean amount of interventions per patient varied between 1.8 and 8.3 (WM: 3.7). Tracheotomy rate varied between 0 and 26% (WM: 7%) and rate of open surgery varied between 0 and 27% (WM: 10%). Single modality CO lasering showed highest rate of recurrence, highest amount of interventions, and shortest time interval. Combined techniques generated overall better outcomes. A multitude of endoscopic techniques are being used for treating iSGS, all with a considerable recurrence rate. In this review, no superior modality could be identified. Consequently, endoscopic management could be considered a valuable primary treatment option for iSGS, but open surgery still plays an important role.

摘要

确定治疗特发性声门下狭窄(iSGS)的不同内镜技术,并评估治疗效果。检索了Embase和Cochrane图书馆中关于内镜治疗iSGS的出版物。确定的干预措施包括使用冷刀、扩张(硬质或球囊)或激光(CO或Nd:YAG)的手术,这些手术有多种组合方式,并辅以丝裂霉素C和/或皮质类固醇。主要终点是连续内镜手术之间的时间间隔。次要终点是狭窄复发率、随访期间每位患者的干预总数、气管切开率和开放手术率。共审查了86篇摘要,15个系列纳入分析。平均样本量为57名受试者(范围10 - 384,标准差90.84),平均年龄为47岁(范围36 - 54,标准差4.45)。时间间隔为2至21个月[加权均值(WM):12]。狭窄复发率为40%至100%(WM:68%)。每位患者的平均干预次数在1.8至8.3之间(WM:3.7)。气管切开率在0至26%之间(WM:7%),开放手术率在0至27%之间(WM:10%)。单一模式的CO激光治疗显示出最高的复发率、最多的干预次数和最短的时间间隔。联合技术总体上产生了更好的结果。多种内镜技术被用于治疗iSGS,所有技术的复发率都相当高。在本综述中,未发现 superior modality。因此,内镜治疗可被视为iSGS的一种有价值的主要治疗选择,但开放手术仍起着重要作用。 (注:原文中“superior modality”未明确给出具体含义,可能是“更优方式”之类的表述,这里保留英文未翻译)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cea/6965146/6d54d248edae/fsurg-06-00075-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验