Adams Bethany L, Hadenfeldt Cynthia
Creighton University College of Nursing, Omaha, Nebraska.
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2020 Jan/Mar;42(1):48-53. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000282.
Emergency department (ED) providers spend a significant amount of time treating low-acuity medical conditions, such as simple laceration repairs. Lacerations account for 5% of all ED visits in the United States (). An extended period of time by the provider is required for traditional wound repair, and there is perceived pain reported by patients (). The closure devices (Zip Closure device) are a latex-free, noninvasive alternative to staples, sutures, and glue and make wound closure an easy, fast process, allowing patients to remove the device after the wound has healed. The purpose/aim of this quality improvement project was to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a noninvasive wound closure technique in the ED. The specific aims were to determine whether the Zip Closure device resulted in cost savings for the facility by decreasing the provider time that was needed for the laceration repair and determine whether there was an improved patient satisfaction compared with traditional wound closure methods. Following provider education regarding the use of the Zip Closure device, the device was available to providers over a 4-month period of time for use with patients in the ED. There were 63 lacerations seen in the ED during the 4 months of the quality improvement project, and an evaluation note was completed by a provider on all wounds. Six subjects were treated with the Zip Closure device, and 5 expressed satisfaction with the device. Providers stated that barriers to using the product on more wounds were that the lacerations were nonlinear, complex, high tension, and superficial or involved the finger, hand, scalp, face, or mouth; therefore, the device was inappropriate for treatment of the laceration. This was preliminary work of the noninvasive wound closure device. It is recommended that the study be repeated in a larger ED setting.
急诊科(ED)医护人员花费大量时间治疗低急症医疗状况,如简单的伤口缝合。在美国,伤口占所有急诊科就诊病例的5%()。传统伤口修复需要医护人员花费较长时间,且患者会感到疼痛()。闭合装置(拉链闭合装置)是一种不含乳胶、非侵入性的替代缝合钉、缝线和胶水的方法,使伤口闭合变得轻松、快速,患者可在伤口愈合后自行拆除该装置。本质量改进项目的目的/目标是在急诊科实施并评估一种非侵入性伤口闭合技术的有效性。具体目标是确定拉链闭合装置是否通过减少伤口缝合所需的医护人员时间为医疗机构节省成本,以及与传统伤口闭合方法相比,患者满意度是否有所提高。在对医护人员进行了关于使用拉链闭合装置的培训后,该装置在4个月的时间内可供医护人员在急诊科用于治疗患者。在质量改进项目的4个月期间,急诊科共接诊了63例伤口,每位医护人员都对所有伤口完成了一份评估记录。6名患者使用了拉链闭合装置进行治疗,其中5人对该装置表示满意。医护人员表示,在更多伤口上使用该产品的障碍在于伤口为非线性、复杂、高张力、表浅或涉及手指、手部、头皮、面部或口腔;因此,该装置不适用于此类伤口的治疗。这是非侵入性伤口闭合装置的初步研究工作。建议在更大规模的急诊科环境中重复这项研究。