Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):670-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00754.x. Epub 2010 May 14.
The objective was to determine patterns of use of topical skin adhesives (TSA) for laceration repair. The authors hypothesized that TSA use would be more common in children and facial lacerations.
This was a structured retrospective chart review. The setting was a suburban, university-based emergency department (ED) with an emergency medicine (EM) residency; the annual census is 85,000 visits. Charts from consecutive patients presenting with lacerations in the summer of 2008 (June 2008 through August 2008) were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and wound characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records by trained investigators using structured data collection forms. Characteristics of lacerations repaired with TSA or other closure devices were compared with bivariate and multivariate analyses using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
A total of 755 patients presented to the ED with lacerations over the study period, of whom primary closure was used in 667; nine were excluded because the method of closure was unknown. The most common methods of laceration closure were sutures (485), adhesives (88), and staples (86). Adhesives were used to close 27% of facial lacerations, compared to 4% of all other body locations (difference = 23%, 95% CI = 18% to 29%), and in 20% of pediatric versus 8% of adult lacerations (difference = 13%, 95% CI = 7% to 18%). Adjustment for other potential patient and wound characteristics showed that adhesives were more likely to be used to close facial lacerations (OR = 10.0 CI, 95% CI = 5.5 to 18.0) and lacerations in children (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1 to 3.0) and less likely to be used as laceration length increased (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.8). Adhesive use was not statistically associated with patient sex or race, laceration edges or shape, or the need for deep sutures. Forty-three percent of adhesive wounds were closed with no anesthetic, and a topical agent was used in another 48%. In contrast, a local anesthetic agent was injected in 87% of sutured wounds (p < 0.001) and 73% of stapled wounds (p < 0.001).
Topical skin adhesives are used more often for children, facial lacerations, and short lacerations. Use of adhesives may improve patient comfort as need for injecting a local anesthetic is reduced.
确定局部皮肤粘合剂(TSA)用于伤口修复的使用模式。作者假设 TSA 的使用在儿童和面部伤口中更为常见。
这是一项结构化的回顾性图表审查。该研究地点为一家位于郊区的、具有急诊医学(EM)住院医师培训的大学附属医院急诊部;年就诊量为 85000 人次。对 2008 年夏季(2008 年 6 月至 2008 年 8 月)就诊的连续出现伤口的患者的图表进行了回顾。通过受过培训的调查员使用结构化数据收集表从电子病历中提取人口统计学、临床和伤口特征。使用优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)进行双变量和多变量分析,比较使用 TSA 或其他闭合装置修复的伤口的特征。
在研究期间,共有 755 名患者因伤口到急诊部就诊,其中 667 名患者接受了一期缝合;由于闭合方法未知,有 9 名患者被排除在外。最常见的伤口闭合方法是缝线(485)、粘合剂(88)和订书钉(86)。粘合剂用于闭合 27%的面部伤口,而用于所有其他身体部位的比例仅为 4%(差异为 23%,95%CI 为 18%至 29%),用于儿童伤口的比例为 20%,而用于成人伤口的比例为 8%(差异为 13%,95%CI 为 7%至 18%)。调整其他潜在的患者和伤口特征后,发现粘合剂更有可能用于闭合面部伤口(OR = 10.0,95%CI = 5.5 至 18.0)和儿童伤口(OR = 1.8,95%CI = 1.1 至 3.0),而随着伤口长度的增加,使用粘合剂的可能性较小(OR = 0.6,95%CI = 0.4 至 0.8)。粘合剂的使用与患者性别或种族、伤口边缘或形状或需要深层缝合无关。43%的粘合剂伤口未经麻醉闭合,另外 48%的伤口使用了局部外用药物。相比之下,87%的缝合伤口(p < 0.001)和 73%的订书钉伤口(p < 0.001)使用了局部麻醉剂。
局部皮肤粘合剂更常用于儿童、面部伤口和较短的伤口。由于减少了局部麻醉剂的注射需求,因此使用粘合剂可能会提高患者的舒适度。