• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持国际功能、残疾和健康分类在日本的临床应用 - 制定国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用-30 集的简单直观描述的日文版,通过评级参考指南使其运作,并进行评定者间信度研究。

Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Faculty of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Technical University of Applied Sciences, Rosenheim, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6
PMID:32000774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6993436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in 2001 and has been in the process of implementing it in clinics since then. Current international efforts to implement ICF in rehabilitation clinics include the implementation of ICF Core Sets and the development of simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set (also called Rehabilitation Set). The present study was designed to operationalize these ICF tools for clinical practice in Japan. This work included 1) the development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set, 2) the development of a rating reference guide for Activity and Participation categories, and 3) the examination of the interrater reliability of rating Activity and Participation categories.

METHODS

The Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 Set was developed following the process employed to develop the Chinese and Italian versions. For further operationalization of this ICF Set in practice, a rating reference guide was developed. The development of the rating reference guide involved the following steps: 1) a trial of rating patients by several raters, 2) cognitive interviewing of the raters to analyse the thinking process involved in rating, 3) drafting of the rating reference guide, and 4) review by ICF specialists to confirm consistency with the original ICF concepts. After the rating reference guide was developed, interrater reliability of the rating with the reference guide was determined. Interrater reliability was examined using weighted kappa statistics with linear weight.

RESULTS

Through the pre-defined process, the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for 30 categories of the ICF Generic-30 Set and the rating reference guides for 21 Activity and Participation categories were successfully developed. The weighted kappa statistics ranged from 0.61 to 0.85, showing substantial to excellent agreement of the ratings between raters.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that ICF categories can be translated into clinical practice. Collaboration between clinicians and researchers would further enhance the implementation of the ICF in Japan.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织于 2001 年制定了《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF),并一直在临床中推行。目前,国际上在康复诊所推行 ICF 的努力包括推行 ICF 核心分类组合和为 ICF 通用-30 分类组合(也称为康复分类组合)制定简单直观的描述。本研究旨在为日本的临床实践操作这些 ICF 工具。这项工作包括:1)制定 ICF 通用-30 分类组合简单直观描述的日文版;2)为活动和参与分类制定评定参考指南;3)检验评定活动和参与分类的组内信度。

方法

ICF 通用-30 分类组合简单直观描述的日文版是按照中文和意大利文版本的制定过程制定的。为了进一步将这个 ICF 组合在实践中操作化,制定了一个评定参考指南。制定评定参考指南涉及以下步骤:1)让几位评定者对患者进行评定尝试;2)对评定者进行认知访谈,以分析评定过程中的思维过程;3)起草评定参考指南;4)请 ICF 专家进行评审,以确认与原始 ICF 概念的一致性。在制定了评定参考指南后,确定了使用参考指南进行评定的组内信度。使用线性权重的加权 Kappa 统计检验了组内信度。

结果

通过预先设定的过程,成功制定了 ICF 通用-30 分类组合的 30 个类别的简单直观描述的日文版和 21 个活动和参与分类的评定参考指南。加权 Kappa 统计值范围为 0.61 至 0.85,表明评定者之间的评分具有实质性到极好的一致性。

结论

本研究表明,ICF 类别可以转化为临床实践。临床医生和研究人员之间的合作将进一步加强 ICF 在日本的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f564/6993436/3b184b97599c/12913_2020_4911_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f564/6993436/ad9de800bf3a/12913_2020_4911_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f564/6993436/3b184b97599c/12913_2020_4911_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f564/6993436/ad9de800bf3a/12913_2020_4911_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f564/6993436/3b184b97599c/12913_2020_4911_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study.支持国际功能、残疾和健康分类在日本的临床应用 - 制定国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用-30 集的简单直观描述的日文版,通过评级参考指南使其运作,并进行评定者间信度研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6.
2
Development of a clinical tool for rating the body function categories of the ICF generic-30/rehabilitation set in Japanese rehabilitation practice and examination of its interrater reliability.开发一种临床工具,用于评定日本康复实践中 ICF 通用-30/康复量表的身体功能类别,并检验其评分者间信度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01302-0.
3
Development of a clinical tool for rating categories of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in Polish practice.开发用于波兰实践中 ICF 康复评定集的类别评分的临床工具。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):1359. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28441-2.
4
Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Generic-30 Set for the characterization of outpatients: Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Residents Section Project.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》通用-30 集对门诊患者进行特征描述:意大利物理医学与康复医学住院医师学会项目。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Apr;55(2):258-264. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05324-8. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
5
Toward an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health clinical data collection tool: the Italian experience of developing simple, intuitive descriptions of the Rehabilitation Set categories.迈向《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》临床数据收集工具:意大利开发康复集类别简单直观描述的经验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):290-298. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04250-7. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Towards system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in routine practice: Developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF Generic and Rehabilitation Set.迈向在常规实践中全面实施《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF):制定 ICF 通用分类和康复补充版中 ICF 类别的简单、直观描述。
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun 13;48(6):508-14. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2066.
7
Interrater reliability of the extended ICF core set for stroke applied by physical therapists.物理治疗师应用的中风扩展版国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的评分者间信度。
Phys Ther. 2008 Jul;88(7):841-51. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070211. Epub 2008 May 15.
8
Development of a Korean version of simple, intuitive descriptions for clinical use of the generic functioning domains in the ICD-11 Chapter V.开发一种简单、直观的韩文描述,用于临床使用 ICD-11 第五章通用功能领域。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Nov;46(22):5263-5269. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2307388. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
System-wide Clinical Assessment of Functioning Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in China: Interrater Reliability, Convergent, Known Group, and Predictive Validity of the ICF Generic-6.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类在中国的全系统临床功能评估:ICF 通用-6 的评分者间信度、聚合、已知组和预测效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1450-1457.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
10
Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy.迈向《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》(ICF)康复组合:作为一项健康战略的康复领域最小通用集。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical functioning information tool - coronavirus disease 2019 (ClinFIT COVID-19): psychometric evaluation and development of an interval-scaled functioning score across the care continuum.临床功能信息工具 - 2019年冠状病毒病(ClinFIT COVID-19):心理测量评估及整个护理连续过程中区间尺度功能评分的制定
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Aug 17;57:jrm43227. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.43227.
2
Validation and evaluation of the application of the ICF Rehabilitation Set: a Polish clinical perspective.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类康复组合应用的验证与评估:波兰临床视角》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):1027. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13048-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
System-wide Clinical Assessment of Functioning Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in China: Interrater Reliability, Convergent, Known Group, and Predictive Validity of the ICF Generic-6.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类在中国的全系统临床功能评估:ICF 通用-6 的评分者间信度、聚合、已知组和预测效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1450-1457.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
2
ICF Generic Set as new standard for the system wide assessment of functioning in China: a multicentre prospective study on metric properties and responsiveness applying item response theory.国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用组合作为中国全系统功能评估的新标准:一项应用项目反应理论对度量属性和反应度进行研究的多中心前瞻性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e021696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021696.
3
The standards and tools of the European Union of Medical Specialists Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section and Board for rehabilitation management and care: an evidence brief for rehabilitation practitioners.
欧洲医学专家联盟物理医学与康复医学分会和康复管理与护理委员会的标准和工具:康复从业者的证据摘要。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;60(5):729-736. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08653-2. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Development of a Conversion Table Linking Functional Independence Measure Scores to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Qualifiers: Insights from a Survey of Healthcare Professionals.建立将功能独立性测量分数与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》限定词相关联的转换表:来自医疗保健专业人员调查的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;12(8):831. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080831.
5
Characterization of an Italian population with neurological disorders in a rehabilitation setting using ClinFIT.使用 ClinFIT 对康复环境中的意大利神经障碍患者进行特征描述。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 18;56:jrm18262. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18262.
6
Agreement Between Single Raters and Team Rating When Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health's Rehabilitation Set.单人评估者和团队评估者在应用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》康复组合时的一致性。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Dec 4;55:jrm14737. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.14737.
7
Use of artificial intelligence large language models as a clinical tool in rehabilitation medicine: a comparative test case.人工智能大语言模型在康复医学中的临床应用工具:一个对比测试案例。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Sep 11;55:jrm13373. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.13373.
8
Development of simple descriptions of the ICF Generic-30 Set in different languages: laying the foundation for an ICF-based clinical tool for Europe.开发通用-30 集在不同语言中的简单描述:为欧洲基于 ICF 的临床工具奠定基础。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):271-283. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07932-7. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
9
Development of a clinical tool for rating categories of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in Polish practice.开发用于波兰实践中 ICF 康复评定集的类别评分的临床工具。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):1359. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28441-2.
10
Development of the Polish Version of the ICF Core Set for the Environment of Older People.中文译文:《老年人环境国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合的波兰语版发展》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316341.
Documenting Routinely What Matters to People: Standardized Headings for Health Records of Patients with Chronic Health Conditions.记录对患者有意义的事项:慢性病患者健康记录的标准化标题。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):348-365. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649488. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
5
Rehabilitation: The health strategy of the 21st century.康复:21 世纪的健康战略。
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Apr 18;50(4):309-316. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2200.
6
Toward an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health clinical data collection tool: the Italian experience of developing simple, intuitive descriptions of the Rehabilitation Set categories.迈向《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》临床数据收集工具:意大利开发康复集类别简单直观描述的经验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;53(2):290-298. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04250-7. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Towards system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in routine practice: Developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF Generic and Rehabilitation Set.迈向在常规实践中全面实施《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF):制定 ICF 通用分类和康复补充版中 ICF 类别的简单、直观描述。
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun 13;48(6):508-14. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2066.
8
Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy.迈向《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》(ICF)康复组合:作为一项健康战略的康复领域最小通用集。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
9
Systematic Literature Review on ICF From 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic Countries Focusing on Clinical and Rehabilitation Context.2001年至2013年北欧国家关于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的系统文献综述:聚焦临床与康复背景
J Clin Med Res. 2016 Jan;8(1):1-9. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2400w. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
10
Quality of life in patients with PD and their caregiving spouses: A view from both sides.帕金森病患者及其照料配偶的生活质量:双方视角
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;139:24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Aug 28.