• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记录对患者有意义的事项:慢性病患者健康记录的标准化标题。

Documenting Routinely What Matters to People: Standardized Headings for Health Records of Patients with Chronic Health Conditions.

机构信息

Faculty of Applied Health and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany.

Human Functioning Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):348-365. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649488. Epub 2018 May 23.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1649488
PMID:29791929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5966302/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Specifying the content in electronic health records (EHRs) through standardized headings based on international reference classifications will facilitate their semantic interoperability. The objective of this study was to specify potential chapter headings for EHRs aligned with the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) based on the perspectives of people living with chronic health conditions, carers, and professionals.

METHODS

A multistage process was established including (1) a patient workshop, (2) an online survey of both patients and carers, and (3) an online consultation with patient and professional bodies. The ICF served as a starting point. Based on the first stage, a first draft of the headings was developed and further refined based on the feedback at each stage. We examined in a fourth step whether items from existing assessment tools support the operationalization of the identified headings. Therefore, we used the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS2.0), a patient-reported instrument, and interRAI, a clinician-administered instrument.

RESULTS

The first workshop was attended by eight people, the survey was completed by 250 persons, and the online consultation received detailed feedback by 18 professional bodies. This study resulted in 16 potential chapter headings for EHRs which capture aspects related to the body, such as emotions, motivation, sleep, and memory or thoughts, to being involved in social life, such as mobility, social activities, and finances, as well as to the care process, such as understanding of health issues and treatment or care priorities and goals. When using the WHODAS2.0 and interRAI together, they capture all except one of the proposed headings.

CONCLUSION

The identified headings provide a high level structure for the standardized recording, use, and sharing of information. Once implemented, these headings have the potential to facilitate the delivery of personalized care planning for patients with long-term health problems.

摘要

目的

通过基于国际参考分类的标准化标题来指定电子健康记录(EHR)中的内容,将促进其语义互操作性。本研究的目的是根据患有慢性健康状况的患者、护理人员和专业人员的观点,基于世界卫生组织(WHO)的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)指定与 EHR 一致的潜在章节标题。

方法

建立了一个多阶段的过程,包括(1)患者研讨会,(2)患者和护理人员的在线调查,以及(3)与患者和专业机构的在线咨询。ICF 作为起点。基于第一阶段,制定了标题的初稿,并根据每个阶段的反馈进行了进一步的细化。我们在第四步检查了来自现有评估工具的项目是否支持所确定标题的操作化。因此,我们使用了世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS2.0),这是一种患者报告的工具,以及 interRAI,这是一种临床医生管理的工具。

结果

第一次研讨会有八人参加,共有 250 人完成了调查,18 个专业机构详细反馈了在线咨询。这项研究产生了 16 个潜在的 EHR 章节标题,这些标题涵盖了与身体相关的方面,例如情绪、动机、睡眠和记忆或想法,以及参与社会生活的方面,例如移动性、社会活动和财务,以及护理过程方面,例如对健康问题的理解以及治疗或护理重点和目标。当同时使用 WHODAS2.0 和 interRAI 时,它们涵盖了除一个建议标题外的所有标题。

结论

所确定的标题为标准化记录、使用和共享信息提供了高级结构。一旦实施,这些标题有可能为患有长期健康问题的患者提供个性化的护理计划。

相似文献

1
Documenting Routinely What Matters to People: Standardized Headings for Health Records of Patients with Chronic Health Conditions.记录对患者有意义的事项:慢性病患者健康记录的标准化标题。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):348-365. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649488. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Information standards for recording alcohol use in electronic health records: findings from a national consultation.电子健康记录中酒精使用情况记录的信息标准:全国磋商的结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0612-z.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Use of Headings and Classifications by Physicians in Medical Narratives of EHRs: An evaluation study in a Finnish hospital.使用标题和分类的医生在医疗电子病历的叙述:一项评估研究在芬兰的一家医院。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011 May 11;2(2):143-57. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-12-RA-0073. Print 2011.
5
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records. A Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录中的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)。系统文献综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Dec 20;8(3):964-980. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017050078.
6
Strengthening quality of care through standardized reporting based on the World Health Organization's reference classifications.通过基于世界卫生组织参考分类的标准化报告来加强医疗服务质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Oct;28(5):626-633. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw078. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
7
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
8
Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.电子健康记录的定义、结构、内容、用途及影响:研究文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
9
Information Models Offer Value to Standardize Electronic Health Record Flowsheet Data: A Fall Prevention Exemplar.信息模型为标准化电子健康记录流程表数据提供价值:一个预防跌倒的示例。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 May;53(3):306-314. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12646. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of the use and challenges of electronic health records in physiotherapy practice.物理治疗实践中电子健康记录的使用及挑战的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e097649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097649.
2
Supporting the clinical use of the ICF in Japan - development of the Japanese version of the simple, intuitive descriptions for the ICF Generic-30 set, its operationalization through a rating reference guide, and interrater reliability study.支持国际功能、残疾和健康分类在日本的临床应用 - 制定国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用-30 集的简单直观描述的日文版,通过评级参考指南使其运作,并进行评定者间信度研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4911-6.
3
Electronic Health Record Documentation Patterns of Recorded Primary Care Visits Focused on Complex Communication: A Qualitative Study.电子健康记录中记录的以复杂沟通为重点的初级保健就诊文档模式:一项定性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Mar;10(2):247-253. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683986. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records. A Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录中的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)。系统文献综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Dec 20;8(3):964-980. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017050078.
2
Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information.国际功能、残疾和健康分类链接规则的细化,以加强其建立健康信息可比性的潜力。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):574-583. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy.迈向《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》(ICF)康复组合:作为一项健康战略的康复领域最小通用集。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
A qualitative evaluation of the crucial attributes of contextual information necessary in EHR design to support patient-centered medical home care.对电子健康记录(EHR)设计中支持以患者为中心的家庭医疗护理所需的上下文信息关键属性的定性评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 16;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0150-x.
5
Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?心力衰竭试验中以患者为中心的结局报告:患者偏好是否被忽视?
Heart Fail Rev. 2015 Jul;20(4):385-92. doi: 10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9.
6
The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice.老年人的疾病负担及其对卫生政策和实践的影响。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):549-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集》编制指南
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;51(1):105-17. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
8
Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health.迈向功能与健康领域的最小通用集。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 3;14:218. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-218.
9
Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.知识并非患者的力量:系统综述和主题综合分析患者报告的共享决策障碍和促进因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):291-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
10
Patient and public views on electronic health records and their uses in the United kingdom: cross-sectional survey.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录及其应用的看法:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 23;15(8):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2701.