Suppr超能文献

运用混合方法,通过将学生组织参与映射到课程成果来评估课程外活动。

Assessing the Co-Curriculum by Mapping Student Organization Involvement to Curricular Outcomes Using Mixed Methods.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7354. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7354.

Abstract

To use institution-specific curricular outcomes as a framework to map skill development opportunities available through cocurricular involvement in pharmacy student organizations. Participants completed a modified Extracurricular Involvement Inventory individually to measure the intensity of their involvement in each student organization. Participants also completed the Co-Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Mapping Survey (COAMS) instrument as a group to indicate what skills (ie, curricular outcomes) they developed through involvement in a student organization and student organization activities, programs, and events, and to provide examples of these skills. Data sources were triangulated to map skill development opportunities in the co-curriculum to curricular outcomes. The COAMS identified all curricular outcomes as skills students have the opportunity to develop through student organization involvement in the co-curriculum. Communication was the most common skill identified. Other common skills included professionalism and ethical behavior, collaboration and influence, and in-depth knowledge and proficient skills. A co-curriculum heat map was used to illustrate the degree to which students reported these skills were emphasized through student organization involvement in the co-curriculum. Evaluation of activities in the context of curricular outcomes can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how the co-curriculum complements the curriculum, thereby complying with accreditation expectations. Cocurricular mapping provides valuable information regarding student skill development opportunities to multiple stakeholders (eg, students, faculty, curriculum leadership). This process can be applied to diverse programs, adapted to measure institution-specific experiences, and measure various constructs of interest.

摘要

以机构特定的课程成果为框架,映射通过参与药学学生组织的课外活动获得的技能发展机会。 参与者单独完成了经过修改的课外活动参与度清单,以衡量他们在每个学生组织中的参与度强度。参与者还以小组形式完成了合作课程成果评估映射调查(COAMS)工具,以表明他们通过参与学生组织和学生组织活动、计划和事件发展了哪些技能(即课程成果),并提供这些技能的示例。数据源被三角剖分以将合作课程中的技能发展机会映射到课程成果上。COAMS 将所有课程成果确定为学生通过参与合作课程的学生组织有机会发展的技能。沟通是最常见的技能。其他常见技能包括专业精神和道德行为、协作和影响力以及深入的知识和熟练的技能。合作课程热点图用于说明学生通过学生组织参与合作课程强调这些技能的程度。从课程成果的角度评估活动可以更全面地了解合作课程如何补充课程,从而符合认证期望。合作课程映射为多个利益相关者(例如学生、教师、课程领导)提供了有关学生技能发展机会的有价值信息。此过程可应用于各种计划,适用于衡量特定机构的经验,并衡量各种感兴趣的结构。

相似文献

3
Mapping Pharmacy Student Learning During Cocurricular Activities to National Standards and Institutional Outcomes.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Nov;84(11):7825. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7825. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Mapping and assessment of personal and professional development skills in a pharmacy curriculum.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 15;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0533-4.
8
Description of a novel co-curricular professional engagement program for student pharmacists.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Sep;12(9):1062-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.04.033. Epub 2020 May 21.
9
Professional Pharmacy Fraternities as a Mechanism for Cocurricular Learning: A Qualitative Analysis of Two Organizations.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Aug;88(8):101249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101249. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
An Innovation Sprint to Promote Problem-solving and Interprofessional Skills Among Pharmacy and Public Health Students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jan;87(1):ajpe8852. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8852. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
A Mapping Review of Teamwork Training and Assessment in Pharmacy Education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):8356. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8356. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
Challenges to Implementation of the Co-Curriculum in Accredited Pharmacy Programs.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 May;85(5):8301. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8301. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Approaching an undergraduate medical curriculum map: challenges and expectations.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02778-6.

本文引用的文献

3
Assessing student academic time use: assumptions, predictions and realities.
Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):285-295. doi: 10.1111/medu.13761. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
5
Design and evaluation of a two-phase learner-centered new student orientation program.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Overview of a co-curricular professional development program in a college of pharmacy.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 May;9(3):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Carpe Diem! Seizing the Rise of Co-Curricular Experiences.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):6702. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6702.
8
Professional Organizations for Pharmacy Students on Satellite Campuses.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Jun 25;80(5):78. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80578.
9
Mapping and assessment of personal and professional development skills in a pharmacy curriculum.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 15;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0533-4.
10
An analysis of motivation factors for students' pursuit of leadership positions.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Feb 17;79(1):08. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79108.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验