State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York
Cedarville University, School of Pharmacy, Cedarville, Ohio.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 May;85(5):8301. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8301. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
To determine areas of concern, and challenges to implementing and assessing the co-curriculum in accredited Doctor of Pharmacy programs, along with how confident programs are in their ability to meet the co-curriculum requirement as mandated by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE). A survey was administered to all ACPE-accredited pharmacy programs to collect information regarding areas of concern, challenges, and confidence in their ability to meet the co-curriculum requirement. The frequency of responses to items are presented along with comparisons based on characteristics, including institution type, cohort size, most recent ACPE accreditation review, and supporting offices. The most common concerns centered on the documentation and assessment process. The most commonly reported challenges were lack of enthusiasm or buy-in from faculty, staff, and students; lack of a clear definition of co-curriculum; and faculty time and insufficient staff. Overall, programs had a high level of confidence in their ability to meet the requirements for co-curriculum. The only differences found were related to supporting offices and cohort size. The results suggest that having supporting offices may reduce the co-curriculum burden. Similarly, student cohort size may have an impact on the challenges for some programs, particularly those with moderate-sized cohorts reporting challenges related to faculty and staff. Further research is needed to determine how programs address these critical issues, and to explore whether programs report differently on these areas after completing an accreditation review. The study results may be useful to members of the Academy when evaluating co-curriculum.
为了确定在获得认可的药学博士课程中实施和评估副修课程的关注领域、挑战,以及各课程对满足药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)规定的副修课程要求的能力的信心程度。向所有获得 ACPE 认可的药学课程发放了一份调查,以收集有关关注领域、挑战以及对满足副修课程要求的能力的信心程度的信息。本文展示了对项目的回应频率,并根据机构类型、课程规模、最近的 ACPE 认证审查以及支持办公室等特点进行了比较。最常见的关注集中在文件记录和评估过程上。报告最多的挑战是缺乏教师、员工和学生的热情或支持;缺乏对副修课程的明确定义;以及教师时间和人员不足。总体而言,各课程对满足副修课程要求的能力充满信心。唯一发现的差异与支持办公室和课程规模有关。研究结果表明,拥有支持办公室可能会减轻副修课程的负担。同样,学生课程规模可能会对一些课程的挑战产生影响,特别是那些中等规模的课程报告了与教师和员工有关的挑战。需要进一步研究以确定课程如何解决这些关键问题,并探讨课程在完成认证审查后是否会对这些领域的报告有所不同。本研究结果可能对学院成员在评估副修课程时有用。