Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):6535. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6535.
To evaluate coverage of leadership-related competencies in a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum and the impact of co-curricular and extracurricular experiences on students' leadership perceptions and self-efficacy. Course syllabi were used to comprehensively map the PharmD curriculum to 11 competencies related to the Leadership CAPE outcome. A survey was developed and administered to all first year through fourth year pharmacy (P1-P4) students to evaluate their leadership experience and engagement, and to assess their attitudes and self-efficacy in 11 leadership competencies. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate student level of engagement in leadership activities and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare students' attitudes and self-efficacy based on the extent of leadership engagement. Curriculum mapping revealed that all competencies were covered in at least one course at the introductory or reinforce levels. There were 362 students (68% of all PharmD students) who completed the survey. When responses from students who reported active engagement in pharmacy student organizations (defined as e-board member or chair of committee, N=142 or 39% of respondents) were compared to the rest of the cohort, statistically significantly better attitudes and self-efficacy were seen in 7 of 11 competencies. Perceptions and self-efficacy of the 72 students (19.9%) who reported active engagement in non-pharmacy organizations did not significantly differ from those not actively involved in any organizations. The leadership competencies curriculum mapping exercise was useful in identifying gaps in coverage and depth of coverage, inconsistencies in course objectives accurately reflecting coverage of leadership topics and competencies, and considerations that should be given to co-curricular leadership development. Active leadership engagement in pharmacy student organizations should be encouraged because of associated improved leadership perceptions and self-efficacy.
评估药学博士(PharmD)课程中与领导力相关的能力涵盖情况,以及课外和课外活动经验对学生领导力认知和自我效能感的影响。使用课程教学大纲全面将 PharmD 课程映射到与领导力 CAPE 结果相关的 11 项能力。开发并向所有一年级至四年级药学(P1-P4)学生发放了一份调查,以评估他们的领导经验和参与度,并评估他们在 11 项领导力能力方面的态度和自我效能感。使用描述性统计数据评估学生参与领导力活动的程度,并使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较学生基于领导力参与程度的态度和自我效能感。课程映射显示,所有能力都至少在一门入门级或强化级课程中涵盖。有 362 名学生(所有 PharmD 学生的 68%)完成了调查。当对报告积极参与药学学生组织(定义为电子委员会成员或委员会主席,N=142 或受访者的 39%)的学生的回答与队列的其余部分进行比较时,在 11 项能力中有 7 项看到了明显更好的态度和自我效能感。对报告积极参与非药学组织的 72 名学生(19.9%)的看法和自我效能感与那些没有积极参与任何组织的学生没有显著差异。领导力能力课程映射练习有助于确定覆盖范围和深度的差距、课程目标与领导力主题和能力的准确反映之间的不一致以及应考虑的合作课程领导力发展。应鼓励积极参与药学学生组织的领导力,因为与相关的领导力认知和自我效能感的提高有关。