Block Sebastián, Alexander Jake M, Levine Jonathan M
Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-1003, USA.
Oikos. 2020 Feb;129(2):184-193. doi: 10.1111/oik.06667. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
Phenological shifts, changes in the seasonal timing of life cycle events, are among the best documented responses of species to climate change. However, the consequences of these phenological shifts for population dynamics remain unclear. Population growth could be enhanced if species that advance their phenology benefit from longer growing seasons and gain a pre-emptive advantage in resource competition. However, it might also be reduced if phenological advances increase exposure to stresses, such as herbivores and, in colder climates, harsh abiotic conditions early in the growing season. We exposed subalpine grasslands to ~ 3 K of warming by transplanting intact turfs from 2000 m to 1400 m elevation in the eastern Swiss Alps, with turfs transplanted within the 2000 m site acting as a control. In the first growing season after transplantation, we recorded species' flowering phenology at both elevations. We also measured species' cover change for three consecutive years as a measure of plant performance. We used models to estimate species' phenological plasticity (the response of flowering time to the change in climate) and analysed its relationship with cover changes following climate change. The phenological plasticity of the 18 species in our study varied widely but was unrelated to their changes in cover. Moreover, early- and late-flowering species did not differ in their cover response to warming, nor in the relationship between cover changes and phenological plasticity. These results were replicated in a similar transplant experiment within the same subalpine community, established one year earlier and using larger turfs. We discuss the various ecological processes that can be affected by phenological shifts, and argue why the population-level consequences of these shifts are likely to be species- and context-specific. Our results highlight the importance of testing assumptions about how warming-induced changes in phenotypic traits, like phenology, impact population dynamics.
物候变化,即生命周期事件的季节性时间变化,是物种对气候变化记录最为详尽的响应之一。然而,这些物候变化对种群动态的影响仍不明确。如果提前物候的物种受益于更长的生长季节并在资源竞争中获得先发优势,种群增长可能会增强。然而,如果物候提前增加了对压力的暴露,比如食草动物,以及在寒冷气候下生长季节早期的恶劣非生物条件,种群增长也可能会减少。我们通过将完整草皮从瑞士阿尔卑斯山东部海拔2000米移植到1400米,使亚高山草甸升温约3K,在2000米站点内移植的草皮作为对照。在移植后的第一个生长季节,我们记录了两个海拔高度物种的开花物候。我们还连续三年测量了物种的覆盖度变化,以此作为植物表现的指标。我们使用模型来估计物种的物候可塑性(开花时间对气候变化的响应),并分析其与气候变化后覆盖度变化的关系。我们研究中的18个物种的物候可塑性差异很大,但与它们的覆盖度变化无关。此外,早花和晚花物种在对变暖的覆盖度响应上没有差异,在覆盖度变化与物候可塑性之间的关系上也没有差异。这些结果在同一年早些时候建立的、使用更大草皮的同一亚高山群落内的类似移植实验中得到了重复。我们讨论了可能受物候变化影响的各种生态过程,并论证了为什么这些变化在种群水平上的后果可能因物种和环境而异。我们的结果强调了检验关于变暖引起的表型特征变化(如物候)如何影响种群动态的假设的重要性。