Centre for Ecology &Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4AP, UK.
Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 3PB, UK.
Nature. 2016 Jul 14;535(7611):241-5. doi: 10.1038/nature18608. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
Differences in phenological responses to climate change among species can desynchronise ecological interactions and thereby threaten ecosystem function. To assess these threats, we must quantify the relative impact of climate change on species at different trophic levels. Here, we apply a Climate Sensitivity Profile approach to 10,003 terrestrial and aquatic phenological data sets, spatially matched to temperature and precipitation data, to quantify variation in climate sensitivity. The direction, magnitude and timing of climate sensitivity varied markedly among organisms within taxonomic and trophic groups. Despite this variability, we detected systematic variation in the direction and magnitude of phenological climate sensitivity. Secondary consumers showed consistently lower climate sensitivity than other groups. We used mid-century climate change projections to estimate that the timing of phenological events could change more for primary consumers than for species in other trophic levels (6.2 versus 2.5-2.9 days earlier on average), with substantial taxonomic variation (1.1-14.8 days earlier on average).
物种对气候变化的物候响应差异会使生态相互作用失去同步,从而威胁到生态系统功能。为了评估这些威胁,我们必须量化气候变化对不同营养级物种的相对影响。在这里,我们应用气候敏感性分布曲线方法对 10003 个陆地和水生物候数据集进行了分析,这些数据集与温度和降水数据在空间上相匹配,以量化气候敏感性的变化。在分类和营养组内的生物中,气候敏感性的方向、幅度和时间变化显著。尽管存在这种可变性,但我们检测到物候气候敏感性的方向和幅度存在系统变化。二级消费者的气候敏感性明显低于其他群体。我们利用本世纪中叶的气候变化预测估计,与其他营养级别的物种相比,初级消费者的物候事件时间可能会更早发生变化(平均提前 6.2 天,而不是 2.5-2.9 天),并且存在显著的分类变化(平均提前 1.1-14.8 天)。