Arvinte Dan, Kiran Manish, Sood Manoj
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Bedford Hospital NHS Trust, Kempston Road, Bedford, MK42 9DJ, United Kingdom.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Cup-cage reconstruction has emerged as a possible solution for managing massive acetabular defects with a few existing studies reporting encouraging results at mid-term follow-up. We present our experience with this unitised construct.
Six patients (7 hips) with a mean age of 76 years (73-81) were revised due to catastrophic aseptic failure of a primary cup implanted 10-19 years previously, having a Paprosky type 3B acetabular defect.
At a mean follow-up of 72 months (63-140) no cases have required re-revision. Oxford Hip Scores improved from an average of 8 (1-17) preoperatively to an average of 36 (18-45) at the last follow-up. WOMAC scores preoperatively averaged 76 (49-96) and postoperatively averaged 26.5 points (0-69) at the last follow-up. SF-12 scores improved in both components. One patient showed non-progressive osteolysis around the ischial flange and one had less than 5 mm migration of the construct. One patient died of unrelated causes.
Our study presents one of the longest follow-up of cup-cage construct and supports the previously reported good results; it encourages the use of this construct in reconstruction of massive acetabular defect, with or without pelvic discontinuity.
髋臼杯笼重建已成为处理髋臼巨大缺损的一种可能解决方案,现有一些研究报告了中期随访时令人鼓舞的结果。我们介绍我们使用这种一体化结构的经验。
6例患者(7髋),平均年龄76岁(73 - 81岁),因10 - 19年前植入的初次髋臼杯灾难性无菌性失败而接受翻修,存在Paprosky 3B型髋臼缺损。
平均随访72个月(63 - 140个月),无病例需要再次翻修。牛津髋关节评分从术前平均8分(1 - 17分)提高到最后一次随访时的平均36分(18 - 45分)。WOMAC评分术前平均为76分(49 - 96分),术后最后一次随访时平均为26.5分(0 - 69分)。SF - 12评分的两个维度均有所改善。1例患者坐骨翼周围出现非进行性骨溶解,1例患者结构移位小于5毫米。1例患者死于无关原因。
我们的研究是髋臼杯笼结构随访时间最长的研究之一,支持了先前报道的良好结果;它鼓励在髋臼巨大缺损重建中使用这种结构,无论有无骨盆连续性中断。