Demortier Marine, Leboeuf-Yde Charlotte
1CIAMS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
2CIAMS, University of Orléans, F- 45067 Orléans, France.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jan 28;28(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0287-2. eCollection 2020.
Functional Neurology (FN), founded by FR Carrick, is an approach used by some chiropractors to treat a multitude of conditions via the nervous system including the brain. However, it seems to lack easily obtainable scientific evidence for its clinical validity.
A literature search was done on from its inception till October 2018, supplemented by a search on and to find all published documents by FR Carrick. We identified their types and topics, retaining for a critical review full text scientific articles appearing to test effect/benefit of FN procedures, subjecting them to a basic quality assessment (scoring 0-7). Results from studies of methodologically acceptable standard would be taken into account.
We found 121 published texts, 39 of which were full scientific research articles. Of these, 23 dealt with topics relating to FN. Fourteen articles reported on clinical validity but only seven included a control group. The methodological quality of these seven articles was low, ranging between 1.5-4 out of 7. We therefore did not further report the outcomes of these studies.
We found no acceptable evidence in favour of effect/benefit of the FN approach. We therefore do not recommend its promotion as an evidence-based method. Further research on this topic should be conducted in collaboration with independent scientific institutions using commonly accepted research methods.
This review was registered in PROSPERO (application date 23.02.2019; no CRD42019126345).
功能神经学(FN)由FR·卡里克创立,是一些脊椎按摩师通过神经系统(包括大脑)治疗多种病症的一种方法。然而,其临床有效性似乎缺乏易于获取的科学证据。
1)确定FR·卡里克出版物的主题;2)确定研究性文章、案例研究、摘要和会议论文的比例;3)确定其中有多少是声称或似乎涉及功能神经学效果或益处的临床研究;4)在这些研究中,确定设计和总体研究方法是否适合对功能神经学的效果或益处进行研究;5)考虑七个最低方法学标准,描述与功能神经学临床效果或益处相关的现有证据。
对从创立至2018年10月的文献进行检索,并辅以在[具体数据库名称]和[具体数据库名称]上的检索,以查找FR·卡里克所有已发表的文献。我们确定了它们的类型和主题,保留似乎测试功能神经学程序效果/益处的全文科学文章进行严格审查,并对其进行基本质量评估(评分0 - 7)。将采用方法学上可接受标准的研究结果纳入考虑。
我们找到了121篇已发表的文献,其中39篇是完整的科学研究文章。其中,23篇涉及与功能神经学相关的主题。14篇文章报告了临床有效性,但只有7篇包括对照组。这7篇文章的方法学质量较低,评分在7分制中的1.5 - 4分之间。因此,我们没有进一步报告这些研究的结果。
我们没有找到支持功能神经学方法效果/益处的可接受证据。因此,我们不建议将其作为一种循证方法进行推广。关于这个主题的进一步研究应该与独立的科学机构合作,采用普遍接受的研究方法进行。
本综述已在PROSPERO注册(申请日期2019年2月23日;编号CRD42019126345)。