Suppr超能文献

使用英国皇家病理学院甲状腺术语评估甲状腺细针抽吸术的非诊断率:一项比较行快速现场评估与未行快速现场评估患者的文献系统评价。

Rates of Thy 1-non-diagnostic thyroid fine needle aspiration using the UK Royal College of Pathologists Thy Terminology. A systematic review of the literature comparing patients who undergo rapid on-site evaluation and those who do not.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK.

Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Competence Centre for Thyroid Diseases, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital Authority, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2020 Nov;31(6):502-508. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12804. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The UK Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Thy terminology is an internationally recognised system for reporting thyroid fine needle aspiration. The terminology has been used throughout the UK and Ireland, in some parts of Italy and Switzerland, and elsewhere in the world. There is no systematic review of the literature specifically addressing the use of the non-diagnostic for cytological diagnosis-Thy1/Thy 1c category in the UK RCPath terminology.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of online databases was conducted in October 2019 specifically examining overall reported rates of Thy1 and Thy1c in aspirates classified according to the UK Thy terminology.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were identified showing a Thy1 rate of 13.4% (2540/18 920). The studies were then stratified according to whether or not the patients underwent rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE): 6.0% (353/5841; range 3.0%-10.9%) of ROSE aspirates were Thy1 whereas 18.5% (2072/11 204; range 7.9%-43.3%) of non-ROSE patients were Thy1; (P < .05). Three studies from 2016 reported Thy1c rates of 5.4%, 6.5% and 10.6%, respectively, implying Thy1 rates excluding Thy1c aspirates of 20.9%, 8.7% and 12.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review of the literature shows relatively high rates of aspirates non-diagnostic for cytological diagnosis-Thy1 in the peer-reviewed published literature using the UK terminology. Utilisation of ROSE appears to produce lower rates of Thy1 aspirates and ROSE should be considered if rates of non-diagnostic for cytological diagnosis-Thy1/Thy 1c are high.

摘要

简介

英国皇家病理学家学院(RCPath)的甲状腺术语是一种国际认可的报告甲状腺细针抽吸的系统。该术语在英国和爱尔兰、意大利和瑞士的一些地区以及世界其他地区使用。目前没有专门针对英国 RCPath 术语中细胞学诊断非诊断性-Thy1/Thy1c 类别的文献进行系统评价。

方法

2019 年 10 月,我们进行了一次全面的在线数据库文献检索,专门检查了根据英国甲状腺术语分类的抽吸物中 Thy1 和 Thy1c 的总报告率。

结果

确定了 25 篇文章,显示 Thy1 率为 13.4%(2540/18920)。然后根据患者是否进行快速现场评估(ROSE)对这些研究进行分层:ROSE 抽吸物中 Thy1 的比例为 6.0%(353/5841;范围 3.0%-10.9%),而非 ROSE 患者中 Thy1 的比例为 18.5%(2072/11204;范围 7.9%-43.3%);(P<0.05)。2016 年的三项研究分别报告 Thy1c 率为 5.4%、6.5%和 10.6%,这意味着排除 Thy1c 抽吸物后的 Thy1 率分别为 20.9%、8.7%和 12.7%。

结论

本系统评价文献显示,在使用英国术语的同行评议已发表文献中,非诊断性细胞学诊断-Thy1 的抽吸物率相对较高。如果非诊断性细胞学诊断-Thy1/Thy1c 的比例较高,使用 ROSE 似乎可以降低 Thy1 抽吸物的比例,因此应考虑使用 ROSE。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验