• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺细针穿刺术术语:建立甲状腺细针穿刺术报告的单一统一国际系统的理由。

Thyroid FNA terminology: The case for a single unified international system for thyroid FNA reporting.

机构信息

Department of Pathology Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

UCL Cancer Institute, Bloomsbury, London, UK.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2021 Nov;32(6):714-717. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13017. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1111/cyt.13017
PMID:34050989
Abstract

The use of reporting terminologies for thyroid FNA cytology enables standardisation and international alignment of the reporting of thyroid cytology results, which is essential. There are currently three major internationally recognised systems: Bethesda (TBS), UK RCPath (Thy), and Italian (TIR). A fourth terminology system used in Japan has identical categories to TBS but with different nomenclature. The aim of this review is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the TBS, UK RCPath, and TIR systems, and to make the case for international terminology harmonisation and standardisation.

摘要

使用甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学报告术语可实现甲状腺细胞学报告结果的标准化和国际接轨,这一点至关重要。目前有三个主要的国际公认系统:Bethesda(TBS)、英国皇家病理学院(RCPath)和意大利(TIR)。日本使用的第四个术语系统与 TBS 具有相同的类别,但命名法不同。本文的目的是讨论 TBS、英国 RCPath 和 TIR 系统的优缺点,并为国际术语协调和标准化提出理由。

相似文献

1
Thyroid FNA terminology: The case for a single unified international system for thyroid FNA reporting.甲状腺细针穿刺术术语:建立甲状腺细针穿刺术报告的单一统一国际系统的理由。
Cytopathology. 2021 Nov;32(6):714-717. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13017. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
2
Terminology and nomenclature schemes for reporting thyroid cytopathology: An overview.甲状腺细胞病理学报告的术语和命名方案:概述
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015 Jul;32(4):258-63. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
3
Are we ready to bridge classification systems? A comprehensive review of different reporting systems in thyroid cytology.我们是否准备好弥合分类系统之间的差距了?甲状腺细胞学中不同报告系统的全面综述。
Cytopathology. 2024 Nov;35(6):674-681. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13411. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
4
Rates of Thy 1-non-diagnostic thyroid fine needle aspiration using the UK Royal College of Pathologists Thy Terminology. A systematic review of the literature comparing patients who undergo rapid on-site evaluation and those who do not.使用英国皇家病理学院甲状腺术语评估甲状腺细针抽吸术的非诊断率:一项比较行快速现场评估与未行快速现场评估患者的文献系统评价。
Cytopathology. 2020 Nov;31(6):502-508. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12804. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
'Indeterminate for malignancy' (Tir3/Thy3 in the Italian and British systems for classification) thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology reporting: morphological criteria and clinical impact.“恶性不确定”(意大利和英国分类系统中的Tir3/Thy3)甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学报告:形态学标准及临床影响
Cytopathology. 2014 Jun;25(3):170-6. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12085. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Performance of Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology (ICCRTC) in discriminating indeterminate lesions at low and high risk of malignancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.意大利甲状腺细胞病理学分类和报告共识(ICCRTC)在鉴别低危和高危恶性肿瘤不确定病变中的性能。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2018 Apr;60(1):31-35. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1382-6. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
7
Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)评分较高是否预示恶性风险增加?评估甲状腺结节时 ACR TI-RADS 与细针穿刺细胞学的相关性研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jul;128(7):470-481. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22254. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Risk of malignancy in the various categories of the UK Royal College of Pathologists Thy terminology for thyroid FNA cytology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.英国皇家病理学家学院甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学分类术语的恶性肿瘤风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jan;128(1):36-42. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22201. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
The Bethesda thyroid terminology and progress towards international agreement on thyroid FNA cytology reporting.贝塞斯达甲状腺术语以及甲状腺细针穿刺活检细胞学报告国际共识的进展。
Cytopathology. 2010 Apr;21(2):71-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00749.x.
10
Thyroid cytopathology: updates and molecular testing.甲状腺细胞病理学:最新进展与分子检测
Pathologica. 2019 Jun;111(2):51-57. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-10-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence assisted diagnosis of early tc markers and its application.人工智能辅助早期肿瘤标志物诊断及其应用
Discov Oncol. 2024 May 18;15(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01017-w.
2
Collision tumor of a papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: a case report.甲状腺乳头状癌与滤泡状癌碰撞瘤:一例报告
Thyroid Res. 2023 Aug 7;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13044-023-00167-3.
3
Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate FNAC According to the Italian Classification System: Prevalence, Rate of Operation, and Impact on Risk of Malignancy. An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
根据意大利分类系统,甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查结果不确定的甲状腺结节:患病率、手术率及对恶性肿瘤风险的影响。一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocr Pathol. 2022 Dec;33(4):457-471. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09729-x. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
4
The Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology: Cytohistologic and molecular correlations on 37,371 nodules from a single institution.意大利甲状腺细胞病理学分类及报告共识:单中心 37371 例结节的细胞病理学与分子学相关性。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Nov;130(11):899-912. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22618. Epub 2022 Jul 5.