• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺MRI靶向活检的最佳核心数量和部位?一项系统评价与汇总分析。

The optimal core number and site for MRI-targeted biopsy of prostate? A systematic review and pooled analysis.

作者信息

Tu Xiang, Lin Tianhai, Cai Diming, Liu Zhenhua, Yang Lu, Wei Qiang

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Apr;72(2):144-151. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03639-5. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03639-5
PMID:32003207
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been increasingly utilized for patients of suspicious prostate cancer (PCa). However, the optimal core number and site for MRI-targeted biopsy have not been clearly elucidated.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search in Pubmed, Embase and Ovid up to June 2019 was conducted and we identified studies reporting detection details of every MRI-targeted core. The incremental diagnostic value of performing additional cores was pooled on per-lesion analysis. Our secondary outcome concentrated on detection accuracy for cores of different site within one lesion.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Five studies comprising 2291 patients were identified to elucidate the association between targeted core number and cancer detection rates. Adding the second core to the first one resulted in 19.8% (range: 13.6-26.7%) increase in the detection rate of clinically significant lesions, and adding the third one to the first two resulted in 11.5% (range: 7.8-14.3%) increase. The incremental value of adding the fourth or the fifth core was 6.0% (4.7%, 6.9%) and 4.1% respectively. Four studies arranging MRI-targeted biopsy of more than two cores in well-determined sequences indicated more positive cores with higher cancer grade through center of the lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the number of samples per target from one to two, or two to three resulted in a nonnegligible incremental detection rate of clinically significant lesions, while obtaining more than 3 cores per target provided a diminished incremental value. And performing targeted cores accurately through center of the lesions may help improve diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

引言

活检前多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)已越来越多地应用于疑似前列腺癌(PCa)患者。然而,MRI靶向活检的最佳活检针数和取材部位尚未明确。

证据获取

截至2019年6月,我们在PubMed、Embase和Ovid数据库进行了系统检索,确定了报告每次MRI靶向活检取材细节的研究。在每个病灶分析中汇总增加活检针数的增量诊断价值。我们的次要结果集中在一个病灶内不同部位活检针的检测准确性。

证据综合

确定了五项包含2291例患者的研究,以阐明靶向活检针数与癌症检出率之间的关联。在第一针基础上增加第二针,临床显著病灶的检出率提高了19.8%(范围:13.6%-26.7%),在前两针基础上增加第三针,检出率提高了11.5%(范围:7.8%-14.3%)。增加第四针或第五针的增量价值分别为6.0%(4.7%,6.9%)和4.1%。四项研究按照明确的顺序对两针以上进行MRI靶向活检,结果显示通过病灶中心取材,更多的活检针出现更高癌症分级的阳性结果。

结论

将每个靶点的取材针数从一针增加到两针,或从两针增加到三针,临床显著病灶的增量检出率不可忽视,而每个靶点获取超过3针的增量价值降低。通过病灶中心准确取材可能有助于提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
The optimal core number and site for MRI-targeted biopsy of prostate? A systematic review and pooled analysis.前列腺MRI靶向活检的最佳核心数量和部位?一项系统评价与汇总分析。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Apr;72(2):144-151. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03639-5. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
MRI-guided in-bore biopsy of the prostate - defining the optimal number of cores needed.MRI 引导下经直肠前列腺穿刺活检术——确定所需的最佳芯数。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00734-3.
3
Diagnostic Yield of Incremental Biopsy Cores and Second Lesion Sampling for In-Gantry MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy.机架内 MRI 引导前列腺活检中增量活检芯和第二病变采样的诊断产量。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Oct;217(4):908-918. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24918. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
4
Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.优化前列腺磁共振成像融合靶向活检的靶向核心数量。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?靶向 MRI 引导下前列腺活检:每处 MRI 病灶需要进行两次活检吗?
Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):3858-3864. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4266-x. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required?多参数磁共振成像/超声融合前列腺活检——每一个磁共振成像病变需要 2 个活检核心吗?
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1030-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 5.
8
Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.经会阴与经直肠MRI/TRUS融合靶向活检:临床显著性前列腺癌的检出率
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.多参数磁共振成像与靶向活检联合系统活检与单纯系统活检诊断前列腺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8427.
10
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.在未经前列腺活检的患者中进行前列腺癌风险评估:多参数磁共振成像-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检和系统 TRUS 活检中的鹿特丹前列腺癌风险计算器。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Sextant Systematic Biopsy Versus Extended 12-Core Systematic Biopsy in Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer. sextant 系统性活检与扩展 12 核系统性活检在前列腺癌联合活检中的比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Feb 26;39(7):e63. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e63.
2
How many cores should be taken from each region of interest when performing a targeted transrectal prostate biopsy?在进行靶向经直肠前列腺活检时,每个感兴趣区域应取多少个芯组织?
Prostate Int. 2023 Jun;11(2):122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
3
Optimizing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: the role of core number and location.
优化多参数磁共振成像靶向活检和检测临床显著前列腺癌:核心数量和位置的作用。
World J Urol. 2023 Jun;41(6):1519-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04386-z. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
4
Efficacy and safety of the new biopsy strategy combining 6-core systematic and 3-core MRI-targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.新活检策略(6针系统活检联合3针MRI靶向活检)在前列腺癌检测中的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1058288. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1058288. eCollection 2022.
5
Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml to 10 ng ml.结合临床参数和多参数磁共振成像对前列腺特异性抗原 4ng/ml 至 10ng/ml 的男性进行分层,以制定最佳的诊断策略。
Asian J Androl. 2023;25(4):492-498. doi: 10.4103/aja202288.
6
Establishment of an Individualized Predictive Model to Reduce the Core Number for Systematic Prostate Biopsy: A Dual Center Study Based on Stratification of the Disease Risk Score.建立个体化预测模型以减少系统性前列腺穿刺活检的核心针数:一项基于疾病风险评分分层的双中心研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 14;11:831603. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.831603. eCollection 2021.
7
TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy for a PI-RADS 3-5 Index Lesion to Reduce Gleason Score Underestimation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.经直肠超声引导下对PI-RADS 3-5类索引病变进行靶向活检以减少Gleason评分低估:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;11:824204. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.824204. eCollection 2021.
8
How to Improve TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy following Prostate MRI.前列腺MRI引导下如何改进超声引导靶向活检
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 11;13(22):5647. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225647.