Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Indiana University School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Apr;9(2):271-277. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0067. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Purposes of this study were to (1) develop an instrument of connectedness with health care providers (HCPs) for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer (ages 13 to 21 years); (2) evaluate the content validity of the instrument through expert panels; (3) assess the dimensionality of the instrument; (4) evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the instrument; and (5) evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the instrument through hypothesis testing. The Connectedness with HCPs Scale (C-HCPS) was developed and evaluated in two phases. Phase I involved generating items, having two expert panels (AYAs and clinicians; = 13) evaluate the items for content validity, and pretesting the instrument before pilot testing ( = 6). In phase II, the psychometric properties of the instrument (dimensionality, internal consistency reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity) were evaluated ( = 101). The initial exploratory factor analysis revealed that the items separated into two separate instruments. In addition to the C-HCPS, a Disconnectedness with HCPs Scale (D-HCPS) was revealed. The C-HCPS contains 35 items and the D-HCPS contains 11 items. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a five-factor solution for the C-HCPS and a two-factor solution for the D-HCPS. Internal consistency reliability of the C-HCPS and D-HCPS was 0.964 and 0.881, respectively. Good evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated through hypothesis testing. Findings indicate that the C-HCPS and D-HCPS are both reliable instruments with good evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Further exploration of these instruments using confirmatory factor analysis in a larger sample is needed.
(1)为 13 至 21 岁的青少年和年轻癌症患者(AYAs)开发一种与医疗保健提供者(HCPs)建立联系的工具;(2)通过专家小组评估工具的内容效度;(3)评估工具的维度;(4)评估工具的内部一致性可靠性;(5)通过假设检验评估工具的收敛和判别效度。连接性与 HCPs 量表(C-HCPS)分两个阶段开发和评估。第一阶段涉及生成项目,由两个专家小组(AYAs 和临床医生;n=13)对项目进行内容有效性评估,并在进行试点测试之前对工具进行预测试(n=6)。在第二阶段,评估了工具的心理计量学特性(维度、内部一致性可靠性和收敛/判别效度)(n=101)。初始探索性因素分析表明,项目分为两个独立的工具。除了 C-HCPS 之外,还揭示了一种与 HCPs 的脱节量表(D-HCPS)。C-HCPS 包含 35 个项目,D-HCPS 包含 11 个项目。探索性因素分析表明,C-HCPS 的五因素解决方案和 D-HCPS 的两因素解决方案。C-HCPS 和 D-HCPS 的内部一致性可靠性分别为 0.964 和 0.881。通过假设检验证明了良好的收敛和判别效度的证据。研究结果表明,C-HCPS 和 D-HCPS 都是可靠的工具,具有良好的收敛和判别效度的证据。需要使用更大的样本量进行验证性因素分析进一步探索这些工具。