• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现场微创手术演示用于微创结直肠培训。

Live surgical demonstrations for minimally invasive colorectal training.

机构信息

Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Feb;405(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01858-3. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-020-01858-3
PMID:32006086
Abstract

PURPOSE

Live surgical demonstrations are considered an effective educational tool providing a chance for trainees to observe a real-time decision-making process of expert surgeons. No data exists evaluating the impact of live surgical demonstrations on the outcomes of minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study evaluates perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the setting of live surgical demonstrations.

METHODS

Patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery which was performed as live surgical demonstrations (the study group) performed between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed. These patients were case-matched with those undergoing operations in routine practice (the control group). The study and control group were compared for intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine live surgery cases in the study group were case-matched with its thirty-nine counterparts as the control group. Operating time was longer (200 vs 165 min; p = 0.002) and estimated intraoperative blood loss was higher in the study group (100 vs 55 ml; p = 0.008). Patients in the study group stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.001). While conversion (n = 4 vs n = 1, p = 0.358) and intraoperative complications (n = 6 vs n = 2, p = 0.2) were more frequent in the study group, these outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Overall complications were higher in the study group (n = 22 vs n = 9, p = 0.003). One patient underwent a reoperation due to postoperative bleeding, and one mortality occurred in the live surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Live surgical demonstrations in minimally invasive colorectal surgery seem to be associated with increased risk of operative morbidity.

摘要

目的

现场手术演示被认为是一种有效的教育工具,为学员提供了观察专家外科医生实时决策过程的机会。目前尚无数据评估现场手术演示对微创结直肠手术结果的影响。本研究评估了在现场手术演示环境下接受微创结直肠手术患者的围手术期和短期术后结果。

方法

回顾了 2006 年至 2018 年期间进行的微创结直肠手术(研究组)作为现场手术演示的患者。这些患者与在常规实践中接受手术的患者(对照组)进行了病例匹配。研究组和对照组的术中及短期术后结果进行了比较。

结果

研究组的 39 例现场手术与对照组的 39 例手术相匹配。研究组的手术时间较长(200 分钟 vs 165 分钟;p=0.002),术中估计出血量较高(100 毫升 vs 55 毫升;p=0.008)。研究组患者在医院的停留时间较长(6 天 vs 5 天;p=0.001)。虽然研究组的中转率(n=4 例 vs n=1 例,p=0.358)和术中并发症发生率(n=6 例 vs n=2 例,p=0.2)较高,但这些结果没有统计学意义。研究组的总体并发症发生率较高(n=22 例 vs n=9 例,p=0.003)。1 例患者因术后出血行再次手术,1 例死亡发生在现场手术组。

结论

微创结直肠手术中的现场手术演示似乎与手术发病率增加有关。

相似文献

1
Live surgical demonstrations for minimally invasive colorectal training.现场微创手术演示用于微创结直肠培训。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Feb;405(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01858-3. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
Intraoperative colonoscopy does not worsen the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a case-matched study.术中结肠镜检查不会加重腹腔镜结直肠手术的结果:一项病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3572-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2928-1. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
3
Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.机器人辅助与其他微创途径子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):650.e1-650.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.基于同期子宫切除术入路的微创骶骨阴道固定术的围手术期结局:国家手术质量改进计划数据库的二次分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.手辅助与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术:微创结直肠手术的实践模式与临床结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4.
6
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
Predictors of Overnight Admission After Laparoscopic Myomectomy in a High-Volume Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Setting.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术后住院预测因素:高容量微创妇科手术环境。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis.在欧洲,保险状况不影响肿瘤性结直肠手术后的短期结局,但会影响微创技术的使用:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Nov;403(7):863-872. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1716-8. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Impact of robotic surgery on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction following minimally invasive colorectal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and short-term outcomes.机器人手术对微创结直肠手术后胃肠道功能障碍的影响:发生率、危险因素和短期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 17;39(1):166. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04733-5.
10
The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.正式机器人住院医师培训对年轻结直肠外科医师采用微创手术的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):767-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
New Paradigm of Live Surgical Education: Synchronized Deferred Live Surgery.实时手术教育的新范式:同步延迟实时手术
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.660. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
2
Social Media in Surgical Training: Opportunities and Risks.社交媒体在外科培训中的机遇与风险。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):1423-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Surgical teaching in urology: patient safety and educational value of 'LIVE' and 'SEMI-LIVE' surgical demonstrations.
泌尿外科手术教学:“现场”和“半现场”手术演示的患者安全和教育价值。
World J Urol. 2018 Oct;36(10):1673-1679. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2291-x. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Live surgery courses: retrospective safety analysis after 11 editions.现场手术课程:11 版后的回顾性安全性分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Mar;14(3):319-324. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Live surgery: highly educational or harmful?现场手术:极具教育意义还是有害?
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):171-175. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2118-1. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
6
Increased Caseload Volume is Associated With Better Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic Resections for Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术后病例数增加与更好的肿瘤学结局相关。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Feb;26(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000221.
7
Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.腹腔镜结直肠手术培训中模拟的必要性。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep 27;7(9):185-9. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i9.185.
8
Risk factors for prolonged ileus following colon surgery.结肠手术后肠梗阻延长的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):603-609. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4247-1. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
Historical Development of Pan-European Medical Training for English speaking students in the 16th to 19th Centuries.16至19世纪面向英语国家学生的泛欧医学培训的历史发展
Ulster Med J. 2015 Jan;84(1):42-4.
10
Systematic review of live surgical demonstrations and their effectiveness on training.系统评价活体手术示教及其在培训中的效果。
Br J Surg. 2014 Dec;101(13):1637-43. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9635. Epub 2014 Oct 13.