• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可压锂-X-硅酸盐陶瓷的弯曲强度、断裂韧性、三体磨耗和马氏体参数。

Flexural strength, fracture toughness, three-body wear, and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2020 Mar;36(3):420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.009
PMID:32007315
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test and compare five pressable lithium-X-silicate-ceramics on their mechanical and wear properties.

METHODS

Specimens were pressed and prepared from: i. Amber Press (AP), ii. Celtra Press (CP), iii. Initial LiSi Press (IL), iv. Livento Press (LP), and v. IPS e.max Press (IE). Four-point flexural strength (FS), SEVNB fracture toughness (K), three-body wear (3BW), Martens hardness (HM) and indentation modulus (E) were measured. For CP, FS and HM were measured with and without additional Power Firing. Each subgroup contained 15 specimens. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé test, Kruskal-Wallis-H-, Mann-Whitney-U-, and Spearman-Rho-test (p < 0.05). The Weibull modulus was calculated using the maximum likelihood estimation method.

RESULTS

AP and CP presented higher FS than IL. LP presented the highest Weibull modulus. CP showed lower K values than AP, and AP was not significant compared to LP and IE. The most 3BW material loss was observed for CP. CP revealed higher HM values than the remaining ceramics. IL presented lower E compared to AP and CP. The following correlations were observed between the test parameters: 3BW with FS (r = 0.279, p = 0.015), with HM (r = -0.378, p = 0.001), and with E (r = -0.344, p = 0.004); E with FS (r = 0.203, p = 0.028); and HM with FT (r = -0.223, p = 0.027) and E (r = 0.884, p < 0.001). No correlations were observed between FS and K (r = 0.046; p = 0.346).

SIGNIFICANCE

AP followed by LP showed the highest and IL followed by CP the lowest properties tested. Power Firing of CP improved the flexural strength. Ceramics with high flexural strength and Martens parameters showed lower wear. Materials with high Martens hardness presented lower fracture toughness values and ones with high indentation modulus showed high flexural strength.

摘要

目的

测试和比较五种可加压锂硅酸盐陶瓷的机械和磨损性能。

方法

从以下材料中压制和制备试件:i. Amber Press (AP)、ii. Celtra Press (CP)、iii. Initial LiSi Press (IL)、iv. Livento Press (LP) 和 v. IPS e.max Press (IE)。测量四点弯曲强度 (FS)、SEVNB 断裂韧性 (K)、三体磨损 (3BW)、马氏体硬度 (HM) 和压痕模量 (E)。对于 CP,在有和没有额外的 Power Firing 的情况下测量 FS 和 HM。每个亚组包含 15 个样本。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov、单向方差分析 followed by Scheffé 检验、Kruskal-Wallis-H-、Mann-Whitney-U- 和 Spearman-Rho-检验(p<0.05)分析数据。威布尔模数通过最大似然估计法计算。

结果

AP 和 CP 的 FS 高于 IL。LP 呈现出最高的威布尔模数。CP 的 K 值低于 AP,而 AP 与 LP 和 IE 相比没有显著差异。CP 的磨损量最大。CP 的 HM 值高于其余陶瓷。IL 的 E 值低于 AP 和 CP。观察到以下测试参数之间的相关性:3BW 与 FS (r = 0.279, p = 0.015)、HM (r = -0.378, p = 0.001) 和 E (r = -0.344, p = 0.004);E 与 FS (r = 0.203, p = 0.028);HM 与 FT (r = -0.223, p = 0.027) 和 E (r = 0.884, p<0.001)。FS 与 K 之间无相关性 (r = 0.046; p = 0.346)。

意义

AP 之后是 LP 表现出最高的性能,IL 之后是 CP 表现出最低的性能。CP 的 Power Firing 提高了弯曲强度。弯曲强度和马氏体参数较高的陶瓷磨损较低。马氏体硬度较高的材料断裂韧性值较低,压痕模量较高的材料弯曲强度较高。

相似文献

1
Flexural strength, fracture toughness, three-body wear, and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics.可压锂-X-硅酸盐陶瓷的弯曲强度、断裂韧性、三体磨耗和马氏体参数。
Dent Mater. 2020 Mar;36(3):420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Modern CAD/CAM silicate ceramics, their translucency level and impact of hydrothermal aging on translucency, Martens hardness, biaxial flexural strength and their reliability.现代 CAD/CAM 硅酸盐陶瓷,其透光率水平以及湿热老化对透光率的影响、马氏体硬度、双轴弯曲强度及其可靠性。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jun;118:104456. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104456. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
3
Translucency, flexural strength, fracture toughness, fracture load of 3-unit FDPs, Martens hardness parameter and grain size of 3Y-TZP materials.3 单位 FDP 的半透明度、挠曲强度、断裂韧性、断裂载荷、3Y-TZP 材料的马氏体硬度参数和晶粒尺寸。
Dent Mater. 2020 Jul;36(7):838-845. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Comparison of mechanical properties of different reinforced glass-ceramics.不同增强型玻璃陶瓷的机械性能比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.027. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.所选牙科陶瓷的芯材、饰面瓷和制作技术对双轴弯曲强度和威布尔分析的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul;21(5):353-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00845.x. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
6
Effect of repeated firing on the topographical, optical, and mechanical properties of fully crystallized lithium silicate-based ceramics.重复烧制对完全结晶硅酸锂基陶瓷的形貌、光学和力学性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr;131(4):741.e1-741.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Properties of hot-pressed lithium silicate glass-ceramics.热压硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的性能。
Dent Mater. 2019 May;35(5):713-729. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Evaluation of translucency, Marten's hardness, biaxial flexural strength and fracture toughness of 3Y-TZP, 4Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP materials.评价 3Y-TZP、4Y-TZP 和 5Y-TZP 材料的透光性、马顿硬度、双轴弯曲强度和断裂韧性。
Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):212-222. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
9
Flexural strength and fracture toughness of two different lithium disilicate ceramics.两种不同锂硅石陶瓷的弯曲强度和断裂韧性。
Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):302-308. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-045. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
10
Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials.四方/立方氧化锆材料的抗弯强度、断裂韧性和透明度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):948-954. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.021. Epub 2018 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of minimally invasive posterior veneer Preparation designs on failure load and mode after fatigue (in-vitro study).微创后牙贴面预备设计对疲劳后破坏载荷及模式的影响(体外研究)
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06457-6.
2
Analysis of Different Lithium Disilicate Ceramics According to Their Composition and Processing Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.根据成分和加工技术对不同硅酸锂陶瓷的分析——系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;18(12):2709. doi: 10.3390/ma18122709.
3
[Not Available].
[无可用内容]
Braz Dent J. 2022 Nov-Dec;33(6):103-109. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204993.
4
Comparative analysis of flexural strength of abraded and polished porcelain surfaces - an in vitro study.磨损和抛光瓷表面抗弯强度的比较分析——一项体外研究。
J Med Life. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):61-67. doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0085.
5
Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns-a survey among dentists in Germany.用于牙支持式单冠的材料选择——德国牙医的调查。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):283-293. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9. Epub 2020 Jun 16.