• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磨损和抛光瓷表面抗弯强度的比较分析——一项体外研究。

Comparative analysis of flexural strength of abraded and polished porcelain surfaces - an in vitro study.

机构信息

Sparkles Dental Clinic, Lalapet, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):61-67. doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0085.

DOI:10.25122/jml-2020-0085
PMID:33767787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7982250/
Abstract

Typically, prosthodontists adjust ceramic restorations glazed surface by grinding prior to insertion. Such alterations of surfaces are necessary for the correction of occlusal interferences. We aimed to evaluate and compare the change in flexural strength of ceramic surfaces after re-glazing and polishing. This study included 40 samples of ceramic blocks that were fabricated and glazed, and then fired in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The sample was randomly divided into four groups of 10 samples each. The first group was the control group with unaltered glazed samples. The second group was abraded with an extra-fine diamond bur followed by re-glazing, and the other two groups were polished with two commercially available polishing kits after abrading them with an extra-fine diamond bur. The samples were tested for their flexural strength using a universal testing machine. On the application of the F test on the means of all the groups, a value greater than 0.05 was found, which meant that there is no statistically significant difference in flexural strength values between the groups (P-value>0.05). Since the flexural strength values of the polished group were comparable to the other groups, polishing can be used instead of re-glazing for ceramic restorations. This reduces an additional clinical appointment for the patient and saves working time.

摘要

通常,修复医生会在插入前通过打磨来调整陶瓷修复体的上釉表面。这些表面的改变对于纠正咬合干扰是必要的。我们旨在评估和比较重新上釉和抛光后陶瓷表面的弯曲强度变化。本研究包括 40 个陶瓷块样本,这些样本经过制造和上釉,然后按照制造商的建议进行烧制。样本被随机分为四组,每组 10 个样本。第一组是未经处理的上釉样本作为对照组。第二组用超精细金刚石钻头打磨后重新上釉,另外两组用超精细金刚石钻头打磨后用两种市售的抛光套件进行抛光。使用万能试验机测试样本的弯曲强度。对所有组的平均值进行 F 检验,发现值大于 0.05,这意味着组间弯曲强度值没有统计学上的显著差异(P 值>0.05)。由于抛光组的弯曲强度值与其他组相当,因此可以用抛光代替重新上釉来处理陶瓷修复体。这为患者减少了一次额外的临床预约,并节省了工作时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/9e32a6320a49/JMedLife-14-61-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/eeb1f15ae72f/JMedLife-14-61-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/fa69b9a42058/JMedLife-14-61-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/9e32a6320a49/JMedLife-14-61-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/eeb1f15ae72f/JMedLife-14-61-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/fa69b9a42058/JMedLife-14-61-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205a/7982250/9e32a6320a49/JMedLife-14-61-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of flexural strength of abraded and polished porcelain surfaces - an in vitro study.磨损和抛光瓷表面抗弯强度的比较分析——一项体外研究。
J Med Life. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):61-67. doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0085.
2
Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.两种抛光系统对整体式二硅酸锂陶瓷表面粗糙度、形貌和弯曲强度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e172-e180. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12586. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.评估机头转速、磨料特性和抛光负荷对抛光陶瓷抗弯强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Nov;94(5):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.014.
4
Impact of surface finishes on the flexural strength and fracture toughness of In-Ceram Zirconia.表面处理对In-Ceram氧化锆弯曲强度和断裂韧性的影响。
Gen Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;60(2):138-42.
5
Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing.通过微波和传统烤箱上釉获得的瓷表面及抗弯强度的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jan;101(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60284-X.
6
Effect of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics.表面光洁度对长石质和铝质牙科陶瓷弯曲强度的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Jul-Aug;8(4):311-9.
7
Analysis of Topography, Flexural Strength, and Microstructure of a Lithium Disilicate Glass- Ceramic after Surface Finishing.锂硅玻璃陶瓷表面处理后的形貌、挠曲强度和微观结构分析。
Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Aug 23;37(4):439-446. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8352.
8
Analysis of Surface Roughness, Fracture Toughness, and Weibull Characteristics of Different Framework-Veneer Dental Ceramic Assemblies after Grinding, Polishing, and Glazing.不同基底-饰面瓷牙体修复组件研磨、抛光和上釉后表面粗糙度、断裂韧性和威布尔特征的分析。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e216-e221. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12653. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface roughness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia.粗磨、上釉和 2 种抛光系统对钇稳定四方氧化锆的弯曲强度、表面粗糙度和相转变的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Nov;118(5):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
10
Effects of Surface Abrasion on the Flexural Strength of Glazed and Re-glazed Metal Ceramics: An In Vitro Study.表面磨损对烤瓷熔附金属全冠及重熔烤瓷熔附金属全冠弯曲强度的影响:一项体外研究
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Mar;14(1):110-4. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0293-3. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Flexural strength, fracture toughness, three-body wear, and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics.可压锂-X-硅酸盐陶瓷的弯曲强度、断裂韧性、三体磨耗和马氏体参数。
Dent Mater. 2020 Mar;36(3):420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.两种抛光系统对整体式二硅酸锂陶瓷表面粗糙度、形貌和弯曲强度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e172-e180. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12586. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material.
不同表面处理程序对聚合物渗透陶瓷网络材料表面粗糙度和颜色变化的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;8(1):16-20. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.16. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
An evaluation of wear of human enamel opposed by ceramics of different surface finishes.对不同表面光洁度的陶瓷与人类牙釉质相对磨损情况的评估。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):111-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.155031.
5
An in vitro investigation to compare the surface roughness of auto glazed, reglazed and chair side polished surfaces of Ivoclar and Vita feldspathic porcelain.一项体外研究,比较义获嘉和维他长石质瓷的自动上釉、重新上釉及椅旁抛光表面的粗糙度。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Dec;13(4):478-85. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0223-9. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.釉面和抛光陶瓷对人牙釉质磨损的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):547-8.
7
An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.评估机头转速、磨料特性和抛光负荷对抛光陶瓷抗弯强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Nov;94(5):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.014.
8
Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain.三种超低熔合牙科陶瓷抛光系统的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):486-90. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.021.
9
Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials.喷砂、打磨、抛光和上釉对两种可压铸全瓷牙科材料弯曲强度的影响。
J Dent. 2004 Feb;32(2):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.006.
10
Effects of flaw size and auto-glaze treatment on porcelain strength.裂纹尺寸和自釉处理对瓷强度的影响。
J Dent Res. 1996 Jun;75(6):1414-7. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750061301.