1401 Cathedral of Learning, University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
J Med Humanit. 2020 Dec;41(4):501-513. doi: 10.1007/s10912-020-09613-x.
This essay examines narratives about cadaver dissection through the lens of psychoanalytic theory in order to better understand the nature of medical students' socialization into medicine and its implications for physician-patient communication. The theoretical framework provided by Julia Kristeva focuses attention on the nature of subject-formation in relation to abjection - that which reveals the contingent nature of the speaking self. Analysis of memoirs and other narratives by medical students demonstrates that students encounter the abject in the process of dissecting a corpse, but are rigorously trained to map over this experience using the technical tools of biomedicine. Other students rely on dark and morbid forms of humor to develop a sense of emotional distance from their cadaver. This analysis reveals new insights about the nature of the gap between physicians and their patients. In particular, it indicates that this gap is not fixed or static but fluid and malleable. Physicians are always shifting between the symbolic realm of biomedicine and the affective, semiotic mode of encountering the abject. This malleability provides the key to training and educating medical students, socializing them in such a way that they are reflexive about this process of oscillation. How physicians handle the reality of their fluctuation between the semiotic and the symbolic is what will determine their ability to engage with patients.
本文通过精神分析理论的视角考察了关于尸体解剖的叙述,以便更好地理解医学生向医学专业人士的社会化过程及其对医患沟通的影响。朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)提供的理论框架使人们关注主体形成与“被排斥物”(揭示了言说自我的偶然性本质)之间的关系。对医学生回忆录和其他叙述的分析表明,学生在解剖尸体的过程中会遇到被排斥物,但他们会受到严格的训练,使用生物医学的技术工具来掩盖这种体验。其他学生则依赖黑暗和病态的幽默来与自己的尸体保持情感上的距离。这种分析揭示了关于医生和患者之间差距本质的新见解。特别是,它表明这种差距不是固定或静态的,而是流动和可塑的。医生总是在生物医学的象征领域和遇到被排斥物的情感、符号模式之间转换。这种可塑性能为培训和教育医学生提供关键,使他们能够反思这种摆动过程。医生如何处理他们在符号和象征之间波动的现实,将决定他们与患者接触的能力。