• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次剖宫产与再次剖宫产中子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术的比较:一项随机对照试验

Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mohr-Sasson Aya, Castel Elias, Lurie Irina, Heifetz Sigal, Kees Salim, Sivan Eyal

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Feb;35(3):433-438. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1720638. Epub 2020 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2020.1720638
PMID:32008386
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair, in first compared to repeat cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A prospective randomized control single-blinded trial conducted in a single tertiary center between March 2014 and March 2015, including 32 and 63 women in first and recurrent cesarean sections, respectively. Inclusion criteria were elective operation and gestational age ≥37 weeks. Operative outcomes were compared between the groups including mean operative time, blood loss, hypotension, perioperative nausea and pain. Post-operative outcomes were further compared, including post-operative analgesia demand, first recognized bowel movement, nausea, length of hospital stay, fever, endometritis surgical site infection rate, and total satisfaction.

RESULTS

During the study period, 45 and 50 women were designated for uterine exteriorization and intraperitoneal uterine repair, respectively. Mean blood loss was 452 cc (±10.44) for the extraperitoneal compared to 540 cc (±29.83) for the intraperitoneal uterine repair group ( = .004). No other significant differences in either intraoperative or postoperative complications were demonstrated in and between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal repair of uterine incision is associated with higher operative blood loss compared to uterine exteriorization. No other differences in operative and postoperative complication rates were found between the groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估首次剖宫产与再次剖宫产时子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术的效果。

方法

2014年3月至2015年3月在一家三级中心进行的前瞻性随机对照单盲试验,首次剖宫产组和再次剖宫产组分别纳入32例和63例女性。纳入标准为择期手术且孕周≥37周。比较两组的手术结局,包括平均手术时间、失血量、低血压、围手术期恶心和疼痛。进一步比较术后结局,包括术后镇痛需求、首次排便、恶心、住院时间、发热、子宫内膜炎手术部位感染率和总体满意度。

结果

在研究期间,分别有45例和50例女性被指定接受子宫外置术和腹腔内子宫修复术。腹膜外组平均失血量为452 cc(±10.44),腹腔内子宫修复组为540 cc(±29.83)(P = .004)。两组内及两组间在术中或术后并发症方面均未显示出其他显著差异。

结论

与子宫外置术相比,子宫切口的腹腔内修复术术中失血量更高。两组在手术及术后并发症发生率方面未发现其他差异。

相似文献

1
Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.初次剖宫产与再次剖宫产中子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Feb;35(3):433-438. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1720638. Epub 2020 Feb 2.
2
Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections.剖宫产术中子宫外置与原位修复的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1541-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2186-1. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
3
Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair: effect on intraoperative nausea and vomiting during repeat cesarean delivery - A randomized clinical trial.子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术:对再次剖宫产术中恶心呕吐的影响——一项随机临床试验
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):131-137.
4
Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫外置与原位修复在剖宫产术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;69(2):216-233. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02142-8. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术中子宫外置与原位修复的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):639-47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816521e2.
6
Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial.子宫外置与原位修复对剖宫产术后产妇疼痛的影响:一项随机试验。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
7
Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.剖宫产术后通过胎盘娩出方法及子宫修复部位的感染发病率、术中失血量及手术时长。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Dec;181(6):517-20.
8
Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair for Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术中子宫外置与原位修复的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1209-20. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0448-2. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
9
The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss.胎盘娩出方法及子宫修复部位对剖宫产术后子宫内膜炎及手术失血的影响。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00729.x.
10
Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术中子宫外置修复与原位修复的并发症:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):570-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000277712.67230.22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Health Impact of Surgical Techniques and Assistive Methods Used in Cesarean Deliveries: A Systemic Review.剖宫产术中手术技术和辅助方法的健康影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186894.