Suppr超能文献

初次剖宫产与再次剖宫产中子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术的比较:一项随机对照试验

Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mohr-Sasson Aya, Castel Elias, Lurie Irina, Heifetz Sigal, Kees Salim, Sivan Eyal

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Feb;35(3):433-438. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1720638. Epub 2020 Feb 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair, in first compared to repeat cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A prospective randomized control single-blinded trial conducted in a single tertiary center between March 2014 and March 2015, including 32 and 63 women in first and recurrent cesarean sections, respectively. Inclusion criteria were elective operation and gestational age ≥37 weeks. Operative outcomes were compared between the groups including mean operative time, blood loss, hypotension, perioperative nausea and pain. Post-operative outcomes were further compared, including post-operative analgesia demand, first recognized bowel movement, nausea, length of hospital stay, fever, endometritis surgical site infection rate, and total satisfaction.

RESULTS

During the study period, 45 and 50 women were designated for uterine exteriorization and intraperitoneal uterine repair, respectively. Mean blood loss was 452 cc (±10.44) for the extraperitoneal compared to 540 cc (±29.83) for the intraperitoneal uterine repair group ( = .004). No other significant differences in either intraoperative or postoperative complications were demonstrated in and between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal repair of uterine incision is associated with higher operative blood loss compared to uterine exteriorization. No other differences in operative and postoperative complication rates were found between the groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估首次剖宫产与再次剖宫产时子宫外置术与腹腔内修复术的效果。

方法

2014年3月至2015年3月在一家三级中心进行的前瞻性随机对照单盲试验,首次剖宫产组和再次剖宫产组分别纳入32例和63例女性。纳入标准为择期手术且孕周≥37周。比较两组的手术结局,包括平均手术时间、失血量、低血压、围手术期恶心和疼痛。进一步比较术后结局,包括术后镇痛需求、首次排便、恶心、住院时间、发热、子宫内膜炎手术部位感染率和总体满意度。

结果

在研究期间,分别有45例和50例女性被指定接受子宫外置术和腹腔内子宫修复术。腹膜外组平均失血量为452 cc(±10.44),腹腔内子宫修复组为540 cc(±29.83)(P = .004)。两组内及两组间在术中或术后并发症方面均未显示出其他显著差异。

结论

与子宫外置术相比,子宫切口的腹腔内修复术术中失血量更高。两组在手术及术后并发症发生率方面未发现其他差异。

相似文献

1
Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Feb;35(3):433-438. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1720638. Epub 2020 Feb 2.
2
Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1541-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2186-1. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;69(2):216-233. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02142-8. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):639-47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816521e2.
6
Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial.
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.10.009. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
8
Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair for Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1209-20. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0448-2. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
9
The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):266-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00729.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Health Impact of Surgical Techniques and Assistive Methods Used in Cesarean Deliveries: A Systemic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6894. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186894.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验