Bhaire Vishwanatha S, Panda Nidhi, Luthra Ankur, Chauhan Rajeev, Rajappa Deepak, Bhagat Hemant
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):643-648. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_119_19. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
The effects of ketofol (a combination of ketamine and propofol) on systemic hemodynamics and requirement of opioids/Propofol have already been studied and published. However, there is paucity in the literature on the effects of ketofol on cerebral oxygenation. This study aims to compare the effects of ketofol (ketamine + propofol [1:5]) with propofol on cerebral oxygenation using jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjVO2), in patients undergoing surgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms.
A total of 40 World Federation of Neurosurgeons I and II patients were randomized into ketofol ( = 20) and propofol ( = 20) groups. Postinduction, SjVO2 catheter was inserted, and anesthesia was maintained with propofol and fentanyl in the propofol group and ketofol and fentanyl in the ketofol group. Jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjVO2) was obtained at baseline, 1 h and 2 h intraoperatively, and at 6 h after the surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics and brain relaxation scores were also noted.
Entire SjVO2 values in both groups were within the normal limits. Higher SjVO2 values were observed in ketofol group compared to propofol at 1 and 2 h after starting of the drug and at 6 h after surgery ( < 0.05). In propofol group, a significant fall in SjVO2 was recorded at 2 h after beginning the drug as compared to the baseline ( = 0.001). More than 20% fall in mean arterial pressure (MAP) compared to baseline MAP was noted in 75% of patients in propofol group and 15% of patients in ketofol group ( = 0.002). In propofol group, 55% of patients required rescue drug phenylephrine to treat hypotension, whereas only 15% of patients required it in ketofol group ( = 0.02). Fentanyl requirement in ketofol group was less as compared to the propofol group ( = 0.022). Brain relaxation scores were comparable in both the study groups ( = 0.887).
Maintenance of anesthesia with ketofol provides better cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamic stability compared to propofol in neurosurgical patients.
氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂(氯胺酮与丙泊酚的组合)对全身血流动力学及阿片类药物/丙泊酚需求的影响已得到研究并发表。然而,关于氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂对脑氧合作用的文献较少。本研究旨在比较氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂(氯胺酮 + 丙泊酚[1:5])与丙泊酚对颅内动脉瘤夹闭手术患者脑氧合的影响,采用颈静脉血氧饱和度(SjVO2)进行评估。
总共40例世界神经外科医师联盟分级为I级和II级的患者被随机分为氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂组(n = 20)和丙泊酚组(n = 20)。诱导后,插入SjVO2导管,丙泊酚组用丙泊酚和芬太尼维持麻醉,氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂组用氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂和芬太尼维持麻醉。在基线、术中1小时和2小时以及术后6小时获取颈静脉血氧饱和度(SjVO2)。同时记录术中血流动力学和脑松弛评分。
两组的SjVO2值均在正常范围内。在用药后1小时和2小时以及术后6小时,氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂组的SjVO2值高于丙泊酚组(P < 0.05)。在丙泊酚组,用药后2小时的SjVO2较基线有显著下降(P = 0.001)。丙泊酚组75%的患者平均动脉压(MAP)较基线MAP下降超过20%,而氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂组为15%(P = 0.002)。在丙泊酚组,55%的患者需要使用去氧肾上腺素抢救药物来治疗低血压,而氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂组只有15%的患者需要(P = 0.02)。氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂组的芬太尼需求量低于丙泊酚组(P = 0.022)。两个研究组的脑松弛评分相当(P = 0.887)。
在神经外科手术患者中,与丙泊酚相比,用氯胺酮丙泊酚合剂维持麻醉可提供更好的脑氧合和血流动力学稳定性。