Suppr超能文献

不同胰酶消化方法对非培养表皮细胞悬液移植治疗白癜风患者细胞活力和临床疗效的影响。

Effect of Different Methods of Trypsinization on Cell Viability and Clinical Outcome in Vitiligo Patients Undergoing Noncultured Epidermal Cellular Suspension.

机构信息

Dermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Dermatology Department, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46(10):1307-1314. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002329.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noncultured Epidermal Cell Suspension (NCECS) is a surgical modality used in treating stable vitiligo. Trypsinization of the epidermis may be done either at 4°C overnight (cold) or at 37°C for 30 to 50 minutes (warm). Recently, trypsinization was done at room temperature (25°C) in an in vitro trial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare different trypsinization techniques in NCECS regarding cell viability and clinical outcome.

METHODS

This comparative multicenter study was conducted on 20 patients with stable nonsegmental vitiligo. In each patient, 3, nonacral vitiligo lesions were randomly assigned for treatment by NCECS prepared by warm, room temperature, and cold trypsinization techniques, respectively. A perilesional biopsy was taken from each of the 3 treated lesions as an objective measure of disease stability. After transplantation, all patients received narrow-band ultraviolet B twice weekly for 6 months. Cell viability was assessed in each technique, as well as clinical outcome in all treated lesions.

RESULTS

Warm and room temperature trypsinization techniques were comparable with each other. Both were significantly better than the cold technique regarding viability and repigmentation.

CONCLUSION

Room temperature trypsinization can be used as a convenient substitute to warm trypsinization. Cold trypsinization is not recommended because of its poor results and poor patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

非培养表皮细胞悬浮液(NCECS)是一种用于治疗稳定型白癜风的手术方式。表皮的胰蛋白酶消化可以在 4°C 下过夜(冷胰蛋白酶消化)或在 37°C 下进行 30 至 50 分钟(温胰蛋白酶消化)。最近,在一项体外试验中,将胰蛋白酶消化在室温(25°C)下进行。

目的

比较 NCECS 中不同的胰蛋白酶消化技术在细胞活力和临床疗效方面的差异。

方法

这是一项多中心比较研究,纳入了 20 例稳定型非节段性白癜风患者。在每位患者中,随机选择 3 处非肢端部位的白癜风皮损,分别采用温胰蛋白酶消化、室温胰蛋白酶消化和冷胰蛋白酶消化技术制备 NCECS 进行治疗。对每处治疗皮损进行周围活检,作为疾病稳定性的客观测量指标。移植后,所有患者均接受窄谱中波紫外线 B 照射,每周 2 次,共 6 个月。评估每种技术中的细胞活力以及所有治疗皮损的临床疗效。

结果

温胰蛋白酶消化技术和室温胰蛋白酶消化技术彼此相当。与冷胰蛋白酶消化技术相比,这两种技术在细胞活力和复色方面均显著更好。

结论

室温胰蛋白酶消化可作为温胰蛋白酶消化的替代方法,更为便捷。不推荐使用冷胰蛋白酶消化,因为其效果不佳且患者满意度较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验