• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将道义论检验作为评估个人医疗专业人员素质的标准:一项符合Strobe规范的回顾性研究。

Deontological examination as a criterion for the assessment of personal healthcare professional quality: A Strobe compliant retrospective study.

作者信息

Mazeikiene Sandra, Stasiuniene Jurgita, Vasiljevaite Diana, Laima Sigitas, Chmieliauskas Sigitas, Fomin Dmitrij, Simakauskas Rokas, Jasulaitis Algimantas

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences of the Faculty of Medicine of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18770. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018770.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000018770
PMID:32011467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7220242/
Abstract

Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses range from 30% to 37%. The significance of deontological examinations remains high. In the pursuit of proper evaluation of diagnostic discrepancies, the establishment of pathogenesis, the mechanism of death, and a correct diagnosis are of particular importance.A retrospective study of deontological examinations, aimed at the detection of medical errors and carried out by the State Forensic Medicine Service during the period 1989 to 2016, was performed. The clinical and autopsy data from 1007 cases were collected in compliance with the research protocol.The number of deontological examinations tends to increase. In 60% of cases, the deceased were men. Most cases were in the age group of 50 to 59 years. Most examinations were carried out in relation to improperly provided healthcare services and the patient's death in surgery, admission, intensive care and obstetrics-gynecology departments. In 13% of cases, the diagnosis did not coincide and, in 79% of cases, the diagnoses fully coincided. In 68% of cases, the medical error was disproved.The number of deontological examinations is increasing. In most cases, clinical and autopsy diagnoses fully matched. Incorrectly clinically diagnosed intracranial injuries were the most common diagnostic mistakes. The data are similar to the results of research in other countries and would be relevant to ensuring the prevention of medical mistakes and the improvement of healthcare quality.

摘要

临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异率在30%至37%之间。法医学检查的重要性依然很高。在追求对诊断差异进行恰当评估的过程中,明确发病机制、死亡机制以及做出正确诊断尤为重要。对1989年至2016年期间由国家法医学服务机构开展的旨在发现医疗差错的法医学检查进行了一项回顾性研究。按照研究方案收集了1007例病例的临床和尸检数据。法医学检查的数量呈上升趋势。60%的死者为男性。大多数病例年龄在50至59岁之间。大多数检查是针对医疗服务提供不当以及患者在外科、住院部、重症监护室和妇产科死亡的情况。13%的病例诊断不一致,79%的病例诊断完全一致。68%的病例医疗差错不成立。法医学检查的数量在增加。大多数情况下,临床诊断与尸检诊断完全相符。临床误诊的颅内损伤是最常见的诊断失误。这些数据与其他国家的研究结果相似,对于确保预防医疗差错和提高医疗质量具有参考价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/3131ab4d33e5/medi-99-e18770-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/0b66e3e54811/medi-99-e18770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/be40f35ad623/medi-99-e18770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/5ec91987a299/medi-99-e18770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/3131ab4d33e5/medi-99-e18770-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/0b66e3e54811/medi-99-e18770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/be40f35ad623/medi-99-e18770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/5ec91987a299/medi-99-e18770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c69e/7220242/3131ab4d33e5/medi-99-e18770-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Deontological examination as a criterion for the assessment of personal healthcare professional quality: A Strobe compliant retrospective study.将道义论检验作为评估个人医疗专业人员素质的标准:一项符合Strobe规范的回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18770. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018770.
2
[Development of forensic thanatology through the prism of analysis of postmortem protocols collected at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University].[通过对雅盖隆大学法医学系收集的尸体解剖记录进行分析来探讨法医死亡学的发展]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2011 Jul-Sep;61(3):213-300.
3
Minimizing mistakes in clinical diagnosis.尽量减少临床诊断中的错误。
J Forensic Sci. 1999 Jul;44(4):810-3.
4
Discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings.临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003 Mar;36(3):385-91. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000300014. Epub 2003 Mar 7.
5
Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: a retrospective analysis of 252 cases in Greece.临床诊断与尸检结果:希腊252例病例的回顾性分析
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Feb;129(2):210-4. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-210-CDAAFA.
6
Comparison of the clinical and post mortem diagnoses of the causes of death.
Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Nov 13;114(2):117-9. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00329-7.
7
Clinical diagnoses vs. autopsy findings in early deceased septic patients in the intensive care: a retrospective cohort study.临床诊断与重症监护中早期死亡脓毒症患者的尸检结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Jun;478(6):1173-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02984-5. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Cause of death and significant disease found at autopsy.尸检发现的死亡原因和重大疾病。
Virchows Arch. 2019 Dec;475(6):781-788. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02672-z. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Retrospective Analysis of 291 Cases of Medical Malpractice Involving Death.291例涉及死亡的医疗事故回顾性分析
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Dec;35(6):701-705. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
10
Value of postmortem studies in deceased neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit patients.新生儿及儿科重症监护病房死亡患者尸检研究的价值
Virchows Arch. 2017 Feb;470(2):217-223. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-2056-0. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist.在高科技医学时代,尸检的价值:存在差异的发现。
J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jun;67(6):512-9. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202122. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
2
Is necropsy obsolete - an audit of the clinical autopsy over six decades: a study from Indian sub continent.尸检是否过时——对六十多年来临床尸检的审计:来自印度次大陆的一项研究
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2013 Oct-Dec;56(4):372-7. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.125294.
3
Clinical-pathological discrepancies in critically ill patients with difficult premortem diagnoses.
生前诊断困难的危重症患者的临床病理差异
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011 Dec;23(4):442-7.
4
Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study.新世纪的诊断错误:一项后续尸检研究。
Mod Pathol. 2012 Jun;25(6):777-83. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.199. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
5
[Discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings].[临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异]
Medicina (B Aires). 2011;71(2):135-8.
6
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一所综合大学医院中的临床病理差异。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003.
7
Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: a retrospective analysis of 252 cases in Greece.临床诊断与尸检结果:希腊252例病例的回顾性分析
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Feb;129(2):210-4. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-210-CDAAFA.
8
[Reliability of data of death causes: comparison of premortem and verified by autopsy postmortem diagnoses].[死因数据的可靠性:死前诊断与尸检核实后的死后诊断之比较]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40(7):690-5.
9
Discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings.临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003 Mar;36(3):385-91. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000300014. Epub 2003 Mar 7.