• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生前诊断困难的危重症患者的临床病理差异

Clinical-pathological discrepancies in critically ill patients with difficult premortem diagnoses.

作者信息

Fares Aline Fusco, Cury Patrícia Maluf, Lobo Suzana Margareth

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011 Dec;23(4):442-7.

PMID:23949457
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The importance of autopsies is a common theme of discussions both in Brazil and around the world as it elucidates causes of death and has wide ranging social value. However this is a practice that is gradually being considered unnecessary and there have been a decline in the number of postmortems examinations.

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and pathological diagnosis in critically ill patients with difficult premortem diagnosis.

METHODS

All autopsy cases (total of 98) from any of the three general medical/surgical intensive care units (78 beds in total) affiliated to the medical school from January 2003 to December 2006 were analyzed. We analyzed the clinical and pathological diagnosis based on the Goldman criteria.

RESULTS

In 49 (50%) cases, there were class I and II of Goldman. In contrast, only 30 (30.6%) had a complete agreement between premortem and postmortem diagnosis and were classified as class V. Infections had a significantly greater rate of concordant diagnosis than cardiovascular diseases.

CONCLUSION

We found significant discrepancies between clinical and pathological findings, reinforcing the value of postmortem examination.

摘要

引言

尸检的重要性是巴西乃至全球讨论的一个共同主题,因为它能阐明死因且具有广泛的社会价值。然而,这种做法正逐渐被认为没有必要,尸检数量也有所下降。

目的

比较临终前诊断困难的重症患者的临床诊断与病理诊断。

方法

分析了2003年1月至2006年12月医学院附属的三个普通内科/外科重症监护病房(共78张床位)的所有尸检病例(共98例)。我们根据戈德曼标准分析了临床诊断和病理诊断。

结果

49例(50%)病例符合戈德曼一级和二级标准。相比之下,只有30例(30.6%)生前诊断与死后诊断完全一致,被归类为五级。感染的诊断一致性率明显高于心血管疾病。

结论

我们发现临床和病理结果之间存在显著差异,这进一步证明了尸检的价值。

相似文献

1
Clinical-pathological discrepancies in critically ill patients with difficult premortem diagnoses.生前诊断困难的危重症患者的临床病理差异
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011 Dec;23(4):442-7.
2
Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.临终前临床诊断与尸检结果:重症癌症患者中的差异
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc5782.
3
Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study.重症患者临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异:一项观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Dec;7(6):R129-32. doi: 10.1186/cc2359. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
4
Discrepancies Between Clinical Diagnoses and Autopsy Findings in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Study.危重症儿童临床诊断与尸检结果的差异:一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Dec;146(6):701-708. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw187. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
5
Relationship between premortem and postmortem diagnosis in critically ill bone marrow transplantation patients.危重症骨髓移植患者生前诊断与死后诊断之间的关系。
Crit Care Med. 2002 Mar;30(3):570-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200203000-00012.
6
Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一家儿科重症监护病房临床诊断与尸检结果的比较。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;7(5):423-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000235257.86519.16.
7
Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill patients*.临床诊断和尸检结果:危重症患者中的差异*。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):842-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f64f.
8
Autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time in the intensive care unit.随着时间的推移,重症监护病房中尸检发现的诊断错误。
Hum Pathol. 2018 Jun;76:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
[Development of forensic thanatology through the prism of analysis of postmortem protocols collected at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University].[通过对雅盖隆大学法医学系收集的尸体解剖记录进行分析来探讨法医死亡学的发展]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2011 Jul-Sep;61(3):213-300.
10
Autopsy in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: pathological and clinical agreement.新生儿重症监护病房的尸检:病理与临床的一致性。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Sep-Oct;98(5):471-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Concordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsies anatomopathological findings at a tertiary-level university hospital.三级大学医院临床诊断与解剖病理检查结果的一致性。
Biomedica. 2024 Nov 6;44(4):486-495. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.7097.
2
Comparison of Ante-Mortem Clinical Diagnosis and Final Autopsy Diagnosis: Experience from a Single Academic Centre in Pretoria, South Africa.生前临床诊断与最终尸检诊断的比较:来自南非比勒陀利亚一个学术中心的经验
Diseases. 2024 Sep 27;12(10):229. doi: 10.3390/diseases12100229.
3
Deontological examination as a criterion for the assessment of personal healthcare professional quality: A Strobe compliant retrospective study.
将道义论检验作为评估个人医疗专业人员素质的标准:一项符合Strobe规范的回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18770. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018770.
4
The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities.医学尸检作为临床医学中的质量保证工具:梦想与现实。
Virchows Arch. 2016 Jan;468(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1833-5. Epub 2015 Aug 28.