Department of Paediatrics, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Paediatric Hospital IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 3;15(2):e0228377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228377. eCollection 2020.
To identify subgroups regarding paediatricians' awareness, attitude, practice and satisfaction about management of Sleep-Disordered Breathing (SDB) in Italy using Latent Class Analysis (LCA).
A cross-sectional study was conducted on a large sample of Italian paediatricians. Using a self-administered questionnaire, the study collected information on 420 Paediatric Hospital Paediatricians (PHPs) and 594 Family Care Paediatricians (FCPs). LCA was used to discover underlying response patterns, thus allowing identification of respondent groups with similar awareness, attitude, practice and satisfaction. A logistic regression model was used to investigate which independent variables influenced latent class membership. Analyses were performed using R 3.5.2 software. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Two classes were identified: Class 1 (n = 368, 36.29%) "Untrained and poorly satisfied" and Class 2 (n = 646, 63.71%) "Trained and satisfied." Involving paediatric pneumologists or otorhinolaryngologists in clinical practice was associated with an increased probability of Class 2 membership (OR = 5.88, 95%CI [2.94-13.19]; OR = 15.95, 95% CI [10.92-23.81] respectively). Examining more than 20 children with SDB during the last month decreased the probability of Class 2 membership (OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.14-0.61]). FCPs showed a higher probability of Class 2 membership than PHPs (OR = 4.64, 95% CI [3.31-6.55]).
These findings suggest that the LCA approach can provide important information on how education and training could be tailored for different subgroups of paediatricians. In Italy standardized educational interventions improving paediatricians' screening of SDB are needed in order to guarantee efficient management of children with SDB and reduce the burden of disease.
使用潜在类别分析(LCA)识别意大利儿科医生对睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)管理的意识、态度、实践和满意度的亚组。
对意大利大量儿科医生进行了一项横断面研究。研究使用自填式问卷收集了 420 名儿科医院儿科医生(PHPs)和 594 名家庭保健儿科医生(FCPs)的信息。使用潜在类别分析发现潜在的反应模式,从而确定具有相似意识、态度、实践和满意度的应答者群体。使用逻辑回归模型调查哪些独立变量影响潜在类别成员资格。使用 R 3.5.2 软件进行分析。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
确定了两个类别:第 1 类(n = 368,36.29%)“未经培训且满意度低”和第 2 类(n = 646,63.71%)“接受过培训且满意度高”。在临床实践中涉及儿科肺病专家或耳鼻喉科医生与第 2 类成员资格的可能性增加相关(OR = 5.88,95%CI [2.94-13.19];OR = 15.95,95%CI [10.92-23.81])。在过去一个月内检查超过 20 名 SDB 儿童的可能性降低了第 2 类成员资格的可能性(OR = 0.29,95%CI [0.14-0.61])。与 PHP 相比,FCP 更有可能属于第 2 类(OR = 4.64,95%CI [3.31-6.55])。
这些发现表明,潜在类别分析方法可以提供有关如何为不同亚组儿科医生量身定制教育和培训的重要信息。在意大利,需要开展标准化的教育干预措施,以提高儿科医生对 SDB 的筛查,从而保证对 SDB 儿童进行有效的管理并减轻疾病负担。