• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度奶牛庇护所(高利沙拉斯)的管理,包括庇护所管理者对奶牛福利的态度。

The Management of Cow Shelters (Gaushalas) in India, Including the Attitudes of Shelter Managers to Cow Welfare.

作者信息

Sharma Arvind, Schuetze Catherine, Phillips Clive J C

机构信息

Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus 4343, Australia.

Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 28;10(2):211. doi: 10.3390/ani10020211.

DOI:10.3390/ani10020211
PMID:32012807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7070297/
Abstract

Gaushala management is a specialized profession requiring particular skills relating to the management of cow shelters or gaushalas, which are traditional and ancient Indian institutions that shelter old, unproductive and abandoned cows, The 1800 registered cow shelters in India have managers who are important stakeholders in the management of cows in these unique institutions. It is important to survey the routine management of these shelters and attitudes of the managers towards cow welfare to identify the constraints and welfare issues. We visited 54 shelters in six states of India for a face-to-face structured interview of the managers. Quantitative data collection included questions on demographics, routine management operations, protocols followed in the shelters and attitudes of the managers towards cow welfare. All shelters except one were managed by males, half of them were in the age range of 45-65 years, were university graduates or post-graduates, with 5-15 years shelter management experience, and with the majority having lived in rural areas for most of their lives. Each shelter housed a median of 232 cattle were housed, out of which 13 were lactating cows. The majority of managers vaccinated their animals against endemic diseases like foot and mouth disease, haemorrhagic septicaemia and black quarter (gangraena emphysematosa) and administered endo-and ectoparasiticidal treatments, however, hardly any screened the cattle for brucellosis and tuberculosis. Only 17% of the shelters had in house veterinarians and most cows died of old age, with an annual mortality rate of 14%. The majority of the shelters allowed the cows to reproduce. Access to pasture was available in only 41% of the shelters, while most allowed some access to yards. Most (57%) had limited biosecurity measures, but 82% of the shelters disposed of the carcasses by deep burial on their own premises or through the municipality, with 18% disposing of them in open spaces or nearby creeks. About one half of the shelters maintained records of the protocols followed routinely. Charitable societies ran half of the shelters, mostly through public donations, with accounts audited regularly. Most managers thought that shelter cows' welfare was important and that they should attempt to improve it. They were less in agreement that their knowledge of animal welfare was adequate. Local support, more moral than financial, was recognized more than government support. Managers perceived cow welfare as important from a religious perspective, citing the mother god and caring for abandoned animals as frequent themes in their definition of cow welfare. Caring for animals, mother and goddess were key elements in managers' perception of animal welfare. The recommendations arising from this survey include that the shelter managers should be involved in the decision-making process for the welfare of cows in shelters, which is vital for the sustainability of these unique institutions. Welfare could be improved by strict compliance with biosecurity measures and disease surveillance protocols, avoidance of unrestricted reproduction in cows and separation of males and females.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/ed18fcbf7a89/animals-10-00211-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/bfa6a482b63d/animals-10-00211-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/8a6f49bbd82f/animals-10-00211-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/ed18fcbf7a89/animals-10-00211-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/bfa6a482b63d/animals-10-00211-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/8a6f49bbd82f/animals-10-00211-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1686/7070297/ed18fcbf7a89/animals-10-00211-g003.jpg
摘要

奶牛庇护所管理是一项专业工作,需要具备与奶牛庇护所管理相关的特定技能,奶牛庇护所是印度传统且古老的机构,用于收容年老、无生产力和被遗弃的奶牛。印度1800家注册奶牛庇护所的管理者是这些独特机构中奶牛管理的重要利益相关者。调查这些庇护所的日常管理以及管理者对奶牛福利的态度,以确定制约因素和福利问题非常重要。我们走访了印度六个邦的54家庇护所,对管理者进行面对面的结构化访谈。定量数据收集包括有关人口统计学、日常管理操作、庇护所遵循的规程以及管理者对奶牛福利态度的问题。除一家庇护所外,所有庇护所均由男性管理,其中一半年龄在45 - 65岁之间,是大学毕业生或研究生,有5 - 15年的庇护所管理经验,且大多数人一生大部分时间生活在农村地区。每个庇护所平均饲养232头牛,其中13头是泌乳母牛。大多数管理者为其动物接种口蹄疫、出血性败血症和黑腿病(气性坏疽)等地方病疫苗,并进行体内外驱虫治疗,然而,几乎没有人对牛进行布鲁氏菌病和结核病筛查。只有17%的庇护所有内部兽医,大多数奶牛死于老年,年死亡率为14%。大多数庇护所允许奶牛繁殖。只有41%的庇护所有牧场可供使用,而大多数允许奶牛进入一些场地。大多数(57%)庇护所的生物安全措施有限,但82%的庇护所通过在自己的场地深埋或通过市政当局处理尸体,18%的庇护所在露天场地或附近小溪处理尸体。约一半的庇护所记录了日常遵循的规程。慈善社团管理着一半的庇护所,大多通过公众捐赠,账目定期审计。大多数管理者认为庇护所奶牛的福利很重要,并应努力改善。但他们对自己动物福利知识是否足够的看法不太一致。人们认识到当地支持(更多是道义上而非经济上的)比政府支持更多。管理者从宗教角度认为奶牛福利很重要,在他们对奶牛福利的定义中,经常提到圣母和照顾被遗弃动物等主题。照顾动物、母亲和女神是管理者对动物福利认知的关键要素。本次调查提出的建议包括,庇护所管理者应参与庇护所奶牛福利的决策过程,这对这些独特机构的可持续发展至关重要。通过严格遵守生物安全措施和疾病监测规程、避免奶牛无节制繁殖以及将公母牛分开,可以改善福利。

相似文献

1
The Management of Cow Shelters (Gaushalas) in India, Including the Attitudes of Shelter Managers to Cow Welfare.印度奶牛庇护所(高利沙拉斯)的管理,包括庇护所管理者对奶牛福利的态度。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 28;10(2):211. doi: 10.3390/ani10020211.
2
Public Attitudes towards Cow Welfare and Cow Shelters (Gaushalas) in India.印度公众对奶牛福利及奶牛收容所(高沙拉)的态度。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 14;9(11):972. doi: 10.3390/ani9110972.
3
The Welfare of Cows in Indian Shelters.印度收容所中奶牛的福利状况。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;9(4):172. doi: 10.3390/ani9040172.
4
Lameness in Sheltered Cows and Its Association with Cow and Shelter Attributes.圈养奶牛的跛足及其与奶牛和圈舍属性的关联。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 16;9(6):360. doi: 10.3390/ani9060360.
5
Avoidance Distance in Sheltered Cows and Its Association with Other Welfare Parameters.圈养奶牛的回避距离及其与其他福利参数的关联。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 28;9(7):396. doi: 10.3390/ani9070396.
6
Hair Cortisol in Sheltered Cows and Its Association with Other Welfare Indicators.舍饲奶牛的毛发皮质醇及其与其他福利指标的关联。
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 16;9(5):248. doi: 10.3390/ani9050248.
7
Cattle Reproductive Disorders Documented from Gaushalas of Nepal.尼泊尔奶牛场记录的牛生殖系统疾病
Vet Med Int. 2024 Apr 23;2024:3058386. doi: 10.1155/2024/3058386. eCollection 2024.
8
Survey of animal shelter managers regarding shelter veterinary medical services.针对动物收容所兽医医疗服务对动物收容所管理人员进行的调查。
Vet J. 2016 Apr;210:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
9
Perceptions of dairy cow-handling situations: A comparison of public and industry samples.奶牛饲养管理情况认知:公众和业内人士样本对比。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Jan;107(1):540-554. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23496. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Field survey to evaluate space allowances for dairy cows in Great Britain.英国奶牛空间分配的实地调查评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3745-3759. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17004. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cow Paradox-A Scoping Review of Dairy Bovine Welfare in India Using the Five Freedoms.奶牛悖论——基于五项自由对印度奶牛福利的范围综述
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;15(3):454. doi: 10.3390/ani15030454.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Attitudes towards Cow Welfare and Cow Shelters (Gaushalas) in India.印度公众对奶牛福利及奶牛收容所(高沙拉)的态度。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 14;9(11):972. doi: 10.3390/ani9110972.
2
Asian Livestock Industry Leaders' Perceptions of the Importance of, and Solutions for, Animal Welfare Issues.亚洲畜牧业领导者对动物福利问题的重要性及解决方案的看法。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jun 5;9(6):319. doi: 10.3390/ani9060319.
3
Prevalence and zoonotic potential of intestinal protozoans in bovines in Northern India.印度北部牛肠道原生动物的流行情况及人畜共患病潜力
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2018 Aug;13:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
4
Virulence Potential, Biofilm Formation, and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from Cattle Housed in a Particular Gaushala (Cattle Shelter) and Organized Farm.从特定的牛舍(牛棚)和有机农场中分离的单核细胞增生李斯特菌的毒力潜力、生物膜形成和抗生素敏感性。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019 Mar;16(3):214-220. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2494. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.印度牛结核病的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Dec;65(6):1627-1640. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12915. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes shedding in domestic ruminants and characterization of potentially pathogenic strains.在家畜反刍动物中沙门氏菌属和单增李斯特菌的脱落及其潜在致病菌株的特性研究。
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Oct;210:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
7
Recombinant human adenovirus-5 expressing capsid proteins of Indian vaccine strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus elicits effective antibody response in cattle.表达口蹄疫病毒印度疫苗株衣壳蛋白的重组人腺病毒5型在牛体内引发有效的抗体反应。
Vet Microbiol. 2017 May;203:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
8
Foot-and-mouth disease vaccines.口蹄疫疫苗
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Jul;206:102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
Review: welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems.综述:持续圈养和基于牧场的生产系统中奶牛的福利
Animal. 2017 Feb;11(2):261-273. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001336. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in Sahiwal cattle from an organized farm using ante-mortem techniques.使用生前技术检测来自一个规模化养殖场的萨希瓦尔牛中的结核分枝杆菌和牛分枝杆菌。
Vet World. 2016 Apr;9(4):383-7. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.383-387. Epub 2016 Apr 15.