Institute for Environmental Solutions, Lidlauks, LV-4101 Priekuļu parish, Latvia.
Tartu Observatory, University of Tartu, Observatooriumi 1, 61602Tõravere, Estonia.
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 29;20(3):742. doi: 10.3390/s20030742.
Inland waters, including lakes, are one of the key points of the carbon cycle. Using remote sensing data in lake monitoring has advantages in both temporal and spatial coverage over traditional in-situ methods that are time consuming and expensive. In this study, we compared two sensors on different Copernicus satellites: Multispectral Instrument (MSI) on Sentinel-2 and Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) on Sentinel-3 to validate several processors and methods to derive water quality products with best performing atmospheric correction processor applied. For validation we used in-situ data from 49 sampling points across four different lakes, collected during 2018. Level-2 optical water quality products, such as chlorophyll-a and the total suspended matter concentrations, water transparency, and the absorption coefficient of the colored dissolved organic matter were compared against in-situ data. Along with the water quality products, the optical water types were obtained, because in lakes one-method-to-all approach is not working well due to the optical complexity of the inland waters. The dynamics of the optical water types of the two sensors were generally in agreement. In most cases, the band ratio algorithms for both sensors with optical water type guidance gave the best results. The best algorithms to obtain the Level-2 water quality products were different for MSI and OLCI. MSI always outperformed OLCI, with 0.84-0.97 for different water quality products. Deriving the water quality parameters with optical water type classification should be the first step in estimating the ecological status of the lakes with remote sensing.
内陆水域,包括湖泊,是碳循环的关键点之一。与传统的费时且昂贵的现场方法相比,使用遥感数据进行湖泊监测在时间和空间覆盖范围上具有优势。在本研究中,我们比较了两颗不同哥白尼卫星上的两个传感器:多光谱仪器(MSI)在哨兵-2号上和海洋和陆地颜色仪器(OLCI)在哨兵-3号上,以验证几种处理器和方法,以获得应用最佳大气校正处理器的水质产品。为了验证,我们使用了 2018 年在四个不同湖泊的 49 个采样点收集的现场数据。与现场数据相比,比较了二级光学水质产品,如叶绿素-a 和总悬浮物浓度、水透明度和有色溶解有机物的吸收系数。除了水质产品外,还获得了光学水质类型,因为在湖泊中,由于内陆水域的光学复杂性,一种方法适用于所有情况的方法并不适用。两个传感器的光学水质类型的动态通常是一致的。在大多数情况下,两种传感器的波段比算法都具有光学水质类型指导,给出了最佳结果。对于 MSI 和 OLCI,获得二级水质产品的最佳算法是不同的。MSI 始终优于 OLCI,不同水质产品的准确率为 0.84-0.97。通过光学水质类型分类来推导水质参数应该是用遥感估计湖泊生态状况的第一步。