• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜脐尿管切除术在小儿患者中应用隐蔽切口内镜手术技术。

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Urachal Excision Using Hidden Incision Endoscopic Surgery Technique in Pediatric Patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):937-943. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0525. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1089/end.2019.0525
PMID:32013581
Abstract

Although laparoscopic urachal excision in children has been well reported, there are limited data on a robot-assisted surgery (RAS) approach. The hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) technique is an established method of eliminating visible scars following a number of RAS urologic procedures. We report our experience of using a robotic approach to treat urachal anomalies in children, and we present the first description of utilizing the HIdES port configuration for this procedure. We retrospectively reviewed pediatric patients who underwent resection of a urachal remnant at our institution from 2013 to 2018. Surgical techniques were either the traditional open approach (OA) or RAS. HIdES trocar placement configuration was employed in all robotic cases. Patient demographics, perioperative data, pathology reports, and outcomes were abstracted and compared. Twenty-three patients underwent a urachal remnant resection in the study period (RAS: 14 patients OA: 9 patients). RAS patients were older (8.5 2.0 years,  = 0.031) and weighed more than OA patients (36.1 13.9 kg,  = 0.063). Median operative time for RAS was longer than OA operative time (136 33 minutes,  < 0.01). Fewer RAS patients were outpatient compared with OA (7.1% 66.7%,  < 0.01), but with a median length of stay of 1 day (0-1 day). Two patients (14.3%) in the RAS group experienced postoperative complications within 1 week of the procedure compared with 1 (11.1%) in the OA group. There was no significant difference in blood loss, postoperative narcotic requirements, or duration of follow-up between both groups. RAS is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for urachal anomalies. Complete excision can be achieved by using HIdES port configuration, allowing for excellent cosmetic outcomes that are superior to traditional surgical scars without limitation to essential surgical ergonomics.

摘要

虽然腹腔镜脐尿管切除术在儿童中已有很好的报道,但机器人辅助手术(RAS)方法的数据有限。隐藏切口内镜手术(HIdES)技术是许多 RAS 泌尿科手术后消除可见疤痕的一种既定方法。我们报告了使用机器人方法治疗儿童脐尿管异常的经验,并首次描述了在该手术中使用 HIdES 端口配置的情况。

我们回顾性分析了 2013 年至 2018 年期间在我院接受脐尿管残端切除术的小儿患者。手术技术为传统开放手术(OA)或 RAS。所有机器人手术均采用 HIdES 套管放置配置。提取并比较患者的人口统计学数据、围手术期数据、病理报告和结果。

研究期间有 23 例患者行脐尿管残端切除术(RAS:14 例;OA:9 例)。RAS 患者年龄较大(8.5 2.0 岁,=0.031),体重也高于 OA 患者(36.1 13.9kg,=0.063)。RAS 的中位手术时间长于 OA 手术时间(136 33 分钟,<0.01)。与 OA 相比,RAS 患者中门诊患者较少(7.1% 66.7%,<0.01),但平均住院时间为 1 天(0-1 天)。RAS 组中有 2 例(14.3%)患者在手术后 1 周内发生术后并发症,而 OA 组中只有 1 例(11.1%)。两组间出血量、术后麻醉需求或随访时间无显著差异。

RAS 是治疗脐尿管异常的一种安全可行的开放手术替代方法。使用 HIdES 端口配置可以实现完全切除,从而获得出色的美容效果,优于传统手术疤痕,且不会对基本手术人体工程学造成限制。

相似文献

1
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Urachal Excision Using Hidden Incision Endoscopic Surgery Technique in Pediatric Patients.机器人辅助腹腔镜脐尿管切除术在小儿患者中应用隐蔽切口内镜手术技术。
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):937-943. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0525. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Urachal Excision in Children.儿童机器人辅助腹腔镜脐尿管切除术
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:103-106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.044. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
3
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery of urachal anomalies: a single-center experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗脐尿管畸形:单中心经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Apr;25(4):291-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0551.
4
Laparoscopic hidden incision endoscopic surgery (hides) nephrectomy VS. Traditional laparoscopic nephrectomy: Non-inferior surgical outcomes and better cosmetic results.腹腔镜下隐蔽切口内镜手术(hides)与传统腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:非劣效手术结果和更好的美容效果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):411.e1-411.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
Umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic versus open approach for treating symptomatic urachal remnants in adults.成人有症状脐尿管残余物的脐部保留腹腔镜与开放手术治疗方法对比
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11043. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011043.
6
Hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) trocar placement for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty: comparison to traditional port placement.小儿机器人肾盂成形术的隐藏切口内镜手术(HIdES)套管针置入:与传统端口置入的比较
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):43-47. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0684-2. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Transumbilical Reduced-port Laparoscopic Urachal Resection for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients.经脐单孔腹腔镜小儿及青少年脐尿管切除术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):95-97. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001120.
8
Laparoscopic Surgery of Urachal Anomalies: A Single-Center Experience.脐尿管异常的腹腔镜手术:单中心经验
Isr Med Assoc J. 2016 Nov;18(11):673-676.
9
Laparoscopic excision of urachal remnants is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery in children.腹腔镜下切除脐尿管残余物对儿童来说是一种安全有效的开放性手术替代方案。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):1016-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0127. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
10
Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy and urachal resection for urachal adenocarcinoma.机器人辅助腹腔镜部分膀胱切除术和脐尿管切除术治疗脐尿管腺癌。
Int Braz J Urol. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):609. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382009000500014.

引用本文的文献

1
Current management strategies of urachal anomalies in pediatric patients: A scoping review.小儿脐尿管异常的当前管理策略:一项范围综述。
Front Urol. 2023 Mar 17;3:1159439. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1159439. eCollection 2023.
2
Robot-Assisted Urachal Excision and Partial Cystectomy for Urachal Pathologies: Systematic Review with Insights from Single-Center Experience.机器人辅助脐尿管切除及部分膀胱切除术治疗脐尿管疾病:基于单中心经验的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 14;14(4):1273. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041273.
3
An Infected Urachal Cyst With Umbilical Granuloma in an Adult Patient.
一名成年患者的脐尿管囊肿合并脐肉芽肿感染
Cureus. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):e70559. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70559. eCollection 2024 Sep.