• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊子宫内膜消融术:疗效和患者满意度评估。

Outpatient endometrial ablation: audit of outcomes and patient satisfaction.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bolton Foundation NHS Trust, Bolton, UK.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Nov;40(8):1145-1147. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1700945. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1080/01443615.2019.1700945
PMID:32013655
Abstract

Endometrial ablation in outpatient setting is associated with shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery. The primary outcome of this observational study was initiation and completion of procedure and secondary outcome measures were pain during the procedure and complications. The study was conducted in outpatient women's health clinic of Bolton Foundation NHS Trust UK, between March 2015 and July 2017. Out of 151 patients, all had oral analgesia at home. The procedure was initiated and completed in 83% cases. The median time for procedure was 78.5 s with range (34-120 s). The median intraoperative and immediate post-op pain score was 8 and 2, respectively. Post-procedure hysteroscopy confirmed intact cavity in all. Post-op analgesia was required in 2% cases. Eight-nine percent were discharged immediately, 10% had to be rested and observed for 30-60 min. None had serious complications. Ninety percent were satisfied with outpatient service and would recommend to friends and family.Impact Statement Second-generation endometrial ablation is an effective first-line management option for heavy menstrual bleeding. Outpatient procedure is associated with shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery and avoids general anaesthesia and its complications. This observational study confirmed that it was suitable to start the procedure in 83% cases. Once started, it was possible to complete in 100%. The most common cause for not being able to start the procedure was intolerability to the patients. The median immediate post-procedure pain score was 2 which was highly acceptable to patients. 90% of patients who underwent the outpatient endometrial ablation would choose to have further hysteroscopic procedures as outpatient. Patients should be given choice for endometrial ablation either with or without general anaesthesia. Patients should be carefully selected for outpatient procedure taking into account informed consent, tolerability of speculum examination and endometrial pipelle biopsy as well as understanding anticipation of some discomfort. Further randomised controlled trials should be carried out to determine patient satisfaction with endometrial ablation with or without general anaesthesia.

摘要

门诊子宫内膜消融术与住院时间更短和恢复更快相关。本观察性研究的主要结局为手术的开始和完成,次要结局指标为手术过程中的疼痛和并发症。该研究于 2015 年 3 月至 2017 年 7 月在英国博尔顿基金会国民保健制度信托基金的门诊妇科诊所进行。151 名患者均在家中接受口服镇痛。83%的患者完成了手术。手术中位数时间为 78.5 秒,范围(34-120 秒)。术中即刻和术后疼痛评分为 8 分和 2 分。术后宫腔镜检查证实所有患者宫腔完整。2%的患者需要术后镇痛。89%的患者立即出院,10%的患者需要休息和观察 30-60 分钟。无严重并发症。90%的患者对门诊服务满意,并愿意向朋友和家人推荐。

影响陈述 第二代子宫内膜消融术是治疗月经过多的有效一线治疗选择。门诊手术与住院时间更短、恢复更快相关,并且可以避免全身麻醉及其并发症。本观察性研究证实,83%的患者适合开始手术。一旦开始,就有可能 100%完成。不能开始手术的最常见原因是患者不耐受。术后即刻疼痛评分中位数为 2,患者高度可接受。90%接受门诊子宫内膜消融术的患者会选择再次作为门诊进行宫腔镜检查。患者应根据全身麻醉或非全身麻醉的选择来进行子宫内膜消融术。应根据知情同意、阴道镜检查和子宫内膜刮匙活检的耐受性以及对某些不适的理解和预期,仔细选择门诊手术患者。应开展更多的随机对照试验,以确定有无全身麻醉的患者对子宫内膜消融术的满意度。

相似文献

1
Outpatient endometrial ablation: audit of outcomes and patient satisfaction.门诊子宫内膜消融术:疗效和患者满意度评估。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Nov;40(8):1145-1147. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1700945. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with second-generation endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the HEALTH RCT.腹腔镜下子宫颈以上切除术与第二代子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多的比较:HEALTH RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(53):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta23530.
3
Endometrial ablation in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding.子宫内膜去除术在异常子宫出血管理中的应用
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Apr;37(4):362-79. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30288-7.
4
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.子宫内膜切除术和消融术与子宫切除术治疗月经过多的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 29;8(8):CD000329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000329.pub3.
5
Post-Ablation Cavity Evaluation: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Clinical Study to Evaluate Hysteroscopic Access to the Uterine Cavity 4 Years after Water Vapor Endometrial Ablation for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.消融术后宫腔评估:一项前瞻性多中心观察性临床研究,旨在评估水蒸气子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多 4 年后宫腔镜进入宫腔的情况。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1273-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.775. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
6
Clinical outcomes from a randomised comparison of Microwave Endometrial Ablation with Thermal Balloon endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.微波子宫内膜切除术与热球囊子宫内膜切除术治疗月经过多的随机对照临床疗效
BJOG. 2009 Jul;116(8):1038-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02181.x. Epub 2009 May 11.
7
A randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient versus daycase endometrial polypectomy.一项比较门诊子宫内膜息肉切除术与日间手术子宫内膜息肉切除术的随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2006 Aug;113(8):896-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00967.x. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
8
Hysteroscopic appearance of endometrial cavity after microwave endometrial ablation.经阴道超声在宫腔粘连分离术后的应用
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.09.012.
9
A Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the AEGEA Vapor Endometrial Ablation System.前瞻性、多中心、关键试验,评估 AEGEA 蒸汽子宫内膜消融系统的安全性和有效性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):679-687. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
10
A randomised trial comparing local versus general anaesthesia for microwave endometrial ablation.一项比较微波子宫内膜切除术局部麻醉与全身麻醉的随机试验。
BJOG. 2003 Sep;110(9):799-807.

引用本文的文献

1
Hysteroscopic Findings and Operative Treatment: All at Once?宫腔镜检查结果与手术治疗:能否一次性完成?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 23;12(13):4232. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134232.