IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK.
Palliat Med. 2020 Apr;34(4):454-492. doi: 10.1177/0269216319900141. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
People with dementia requiring palliative care have multiple needs, which are amplified in long-term care settings. The European Association for Palliative Care White Paper offers recommendations for optimal palliative care in dementia integral for this population, providing useful guidance to inform interventions addressing their specific needs.
The aim of this study is to describe the components of palliative care interventions for people with dementia in long-term care focusing on shared decision-making and examine their alignment to the European Association for Palliative Care domains of care.
Systematic review with narrative synthesis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018095649).
Four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) were searched (earliest records - July 2019) for peer-reviewed articles and protocols in English, reporting on palliative care interventions for people with dementia in long-term care, addressing European Association for Palliative Care Domains 2 (person-centred) or 3 (setting care goals) and ⩾1 other domain.
Fifty-one papers were included, reporting on 32 studies. For each domain (1-10), there were interventions found aiming to address its goal, although no single intervention addressed all domains. Domain 7 (symptom management; = 19), 6 (avoiding overly aggressive treatment; = 18) and 10 (education; = 17) were the most commonly addressed; Domain 5 (prognostication; = 7) and 4 (continuity of care; = 2) were the least addressed.
Almost all domains were addressed across all interventions currently offered for this population to various degrees, but not within a singular intervention. Future research optimally needs to be theory driven when developing dementia-specific interventions at the end of life, with the European Association for Palliative Care domains serving as a foundation to inform the best care for this population.
需要姑息治疗的痴呆症患者有多种需求,在长期护理环境中这些需求会被放大。欧洲姑息治疗协会白皮书为这一人群提供了姑息治疗的最佳建议,为满足他们的特殊需求提供了有用的指导。
本研究旨在描述长期护理中针对痴呆症患者的姑息治疗干预措施的组成部分,重点关注共同决策,并检查其与欧洲姑息治疗协会护理领域的一致性。
系统评价和叙述性综合(PROSPERO 编号:CRD42018095649)。
在四个数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 CENTRAL)中搜索了 2019 年 7 月之前发表的关于姑息治疗干预措施的同行评审文章和方案,这些文章和方案报告了长期护理中针对痴呆症患者的姑息治疗,涉及欧洲姑息治疗协会的两个领域(以患者为中心和设定护理目标)和 ⩾1 个其他领域。
共纳入 51 篇论文,报道了 32 项研究。对于每个领域(1-10),都有针对其目标的干预措施,但没有单一的干预措施涵盖所有领域。最常涉及的领域是 7(症状管理;19 项)、6(避免过度激进的治疗;18 项)和 10(教育;17 项);最不常涉及的领域是 5(预后预测;7 项)和 4(护理连续性;2 项)。
目前为这一人群提供的所有干预措施都在不同程度上涉及了几乎所有的领域,但不是在单一的干预措施中。未来的研究在开发终末期痴呆症特异性干预措施时,需要最佳地基于理论,以欧洲姑息治疗协会的领域为基础,为这一人群提供最佳的护理。