Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗干预措施在长期护理机构中的有效性:一项系统综述。

The Effectiveness of Palliative Care Interventions in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Liu Xuan, Chang Yun-Chen, Hu Wen-Yu

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Mackay Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 251020, Taiwan.

School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106335, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 28;14(7):700. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070700.

Abstract

The increasing elderly population is driving higher utilization rates of long-term care facilities, where residents often have multiple chronic diseases, making them potential candidates for palliative care. Timely palliative care interventions can improve their quality of life and medical autonomy. This study systematically reviews the effectiveness of palliative care programs in long-term care facilities. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Airiti Library were searched up to 31 December 2023, using PICO criteria and the following keywords: 'care home', 'nursing home', 'residential aged care facility', and 'long-term care facility' for patients; and 'Gold Standard Framework in Care Homes', 'integrated care pathway', 'care home project', and 'palliative care program' for interventions. Seven articles were included. The results indicate that the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) intervention did not significantly influence overall quality of life but did improve the quality of death. There were no statistical differences in comfort or quality of death between the dementia and non-dementia groups. However, PACE significantly reduced healthcare costs. The implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) notably enhanced the control of terminal symptoms, while the Gold Standard Framework in Care Homes (GSFCH) effectively improved end-of-life care rates, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) signing rates, advance care planning (ACP) completion rates, and reduced inappropriate readmission rates. While palliative care interventions are shown to improve the quality of end-of-life care, their practical application should be adapted to fit the implementation conditions and capabilities of domestic long-term care facilities.

摘要

老年人口的不断增加推动了长期护理机构利用率的提高,这些机构的居民往往患有多种慢性病,这使他们成为姑息治疗的潜在对象。及时的姑息治疗干预措施可以提高他们的生活质量和医疗自主权。本研究系统评价了长期护理机构中姑息治疗项目的有效性。截至2023年12月31日,检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和华艺数位图书馆等数据库,使用PICO标准和以下关键词:针对患者的“养老院”“疗养院”“老年住宅护理机构”和“长期护理机构”;针对干预措施的“养老院黄金标准框架”“综合护理路径”“养老院项目”和“姑息治疗项目”。纳入了7篇文章。结果表明,老年全面护理计划(PACE)干预对总体生活质量没有显著影响,但改善了死亡质量。痴呆组和非痴呆组在舒适度或死亡质量方面没有统计学差异。然而,PACE显著降低了医疗成本。利物浦护理路径(LCP)的实施显著增强了终末期症状的控制,而养老院黄金标准框架(GSFCH)有效地提高了临终护理率、不进行心肺复苏(DNR)签署率、预先护理计划(ACP)完成率,并降低了不适当再入院率。虽然姑息治疗干预措施被证明可以提高临终护理质量,但其实际应用应根据国内长期护理机构的实施条件和能力进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99cf/11277722/3f7a2749d502/jpm-14-00700-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验