• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Choosing wisely in emergency medicine: Early results and insights from the ACEP emergency quality network (E-QUAL).明智选择在急诊医学:从 ACEP 急诊质量网络 (E-QUAL) 获得的早期结果和见解。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;39:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.029. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
2
"Choosing Wisely" Imaging Recommendations: Initial Implementation in New England Emergency Departments.“明智选择”影像检查推荐:在新英格兰急诊科的初步实施
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):454-458. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.32677. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Checklist for Head Injury Management Evaluation Study (CHIMES): a quality improvement initiative to reduce imaging utilisation for head injuries in the emergency department.头部损伤管理评估研究清单(CHIMES):一项旨在减少急诊科头部损伤影像学检查使用率的质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Feb;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000811.
4
Improving Sepsis Management Through the Emergency Quality Network Sepsis Initiative.通过急诊质量网络脓毒症倡议改善脓毒症管理。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Nov;48(11):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
A Broader View of Quality: Choosing Wisely Recommendations From Other Specialties With High Relevance to Emergency Care.更广义的质量观:选择明智——与急诊护理高度相关的其他专业的推荐意见。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;72(3):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.041.
6
Effectiveness of Interventions to Decrease Image Ordering for Low Back Pain Presentations in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.干预措施降低急诊科下腰痛就诊患者影像学检查的效果:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(6):614-626. doi: 10.1111/acem.13376. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Emergency Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Regarding ACEP's Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Survey Study.急诊医师关于美国急诊医师学会“明智选择”建议的知识、态度及行为:一项调查研究
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;24(6):668-675. doi: 10.1111/acem.13167. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Leveraging a Learning Collaborative Model to Develop and Pilot Quality Measures to Improve Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department.利用学习协作模型来制定和试行质量指标,以改善急诊科的阿片类药物处方。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;83(3):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.08.490. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
9
Choosing Wisely in Emergency Medicine: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Academic Chairs and Division Chiefs.急诊医学中的明智选择:一项针对急诊医学学术主任和科室主任的全国性调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1506-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12821. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
10
Implementation of Choosing Wisely: Promise and Pitfalls.明智选择的实施:前景与陷阱
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Dec;44(12):697-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Could Low-Value Diagnostic Tests be Compounding Access Block? A Single-Site, Cross-Sectional Study.低价值诊断测试会加剧就诊障碍吗?一项单中心横断面研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Aug;37(4):e70100. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70100.
2
Usual Care for Low Back Pain at United States Emergency Departments, 2016-2022.2016 - 2022年美国急诊科对腰痛的常规护理
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.005.
3
Drivers of low-value diagnostic tests in emergency medicine practice: a qualitative descriptive study.急诊医学实践中低价值诊断检查的驱动因素:一项定性描述性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2025 Jul 22;42(8):503-510. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214241.
4
CJEM debate: clinical decision rules-thinking beyond the algorithm.《加拿大急诊医学杂志》辩论:临床决策规则——超越算法的思考
CJEM. 2025 Mar;27(3):165-169. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00870-0. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
5
Interventions to improve the quality of low back pain care in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善急诊科腰痛治疗质量的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;19(7):2057-2076. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03736-y. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
6
What works for and what hinders deimplementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice? A scoping review.在急诊医学实践中,哪些因素有助于或阻碍低价值医疗的废除?一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):e072762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072762.
7
A Quality Framework to Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency Department Care.一个解决急诊部门医疗服务中种族和民族差异问题的质量框架。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;81(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
8
Assessing patient, physician, and practice characteristics predicting the use of low-value services.评估患者、医生和实践特征,预测低价值服务的使用。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57(6):1261-1273. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Factors Associated With Repeat Emergency Department Visits for Low Back Pain.与腰痛患者再次前往急诊科就诊相关的因素。
Cureus. 2022 Feb 4;14(2):e21906. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21906. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Longitudinal Content Analysis of the Characteristics and Expected Impact of Low-Value Services Identified in US Choosing Wisely Recommendations.美国明智选择推荐中低价值服务的特征和预期影响的纵向内容分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):127-133. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6911.

本文引用的文献

1
The Yield of Computed Tomography of the Head Among Patients Presenting With Syncope: A Systematic Review.以晕厥为首发症状的患者行头颅 CT 检查的获益:一项系统综述。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):479-490. doi: 10.1111/acem.13568. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Increasing utilization of emergency department neuroimaging in Medicare beneficiaries from 1994 to 2015.1994 年至 2015 年期间,医疗保险受益人的急诊神经影像学利用率增加。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):680-683. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.057. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
An Emergency Medicine-Primary Care Partnership to Improve Rural Population Health: Expanding the Role of Emergency Medicine.一种改善农村人口健康的急诊医学与基层医疗伙伴关系:扩大急诊医学的作用
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):640-647. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
"Choosing Wisely" Imaging Recommendations: Initial Implementation in New England Emergency Departments.“明智选择”影像检查推荐:在新英格兰急诊科的初步实施
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):454-458. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.32677. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Emergency Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Regarding ACEP's Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Survey Study.急诊医师关于美国急诊医师学会“明智选择”建议的知识、态度及行为:一项调查研究
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;24(6):668-675. doi: 10.1111/acem.13167. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Recent Trends in Imaging Use in Hospital Settings: Implications for Future Planning.医院环境中影像检查使用的近期趋势:对未来规划的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Mar;14(3):331-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.025. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
The Science of Choosing Wisely--Overcoming the Therapeutic Illusion.明智选择的科学——克服治疗错觉
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1203-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1516803.
8
Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.早期趋势在明智选择运动的七个建议中。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1913-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5441.
9
Improving emergency physician performance using audit and feedback: a systematic review.通过审核与反馈提高急诊医生的绩效:一项系统综述
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.039. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
10
Emergency department performance measures updates: proceedings of the 2014 emergency department benchmarking alliance consensus summit.急诊科绩效指标更新:2014年急诊科基准联盟共识峰会会议记录
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 May;22(5):542-53. doi: 10.1111/acem.12654. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

明智选择在急诊医学:从 ACEP 急诊质量网络 (E-QUAL) 获得的早期结果和见解。

Choosing wisely in emergency medicine: Early results and insights from the ACEP emergency quality network (E-QUAL).

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT, United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;39:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.029. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.029
PMID:32014376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7365747/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize performance among ED sites participating in the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL) Avoidable Imaging Initiative for clinical targets on the American College of Emergency Physicians Choosing Wisely list.

METHODS

This was an observational study of quality improvement (QI) data collected from hospital-based ED sites in 2017-2018. Participating EDs reported imaging utilization rates (UR) and common QI practices for three Choosing Wisely targets: Atraumatic Low Back Pain, Syncope, or Minor Head Injury.

RESULTS

305 ED sites participated in the initiative. Among all ED sites, the mean imaging UR for Atraumatic Low Back Pain was 34.7% (IQR 26.3%-42.6%) for XR, 19.1% (IQR 11.4%-24.9%) for CT, and 0.09% (IQR 0%-0.9%) for MRI. The mean CT UR for Syncope was 50.0% (IQR 38.0%-61.4%). The mean CT UR for Minor Head Injury was 72.6% (IQR 65.6%-81.7%). ED sites with sustained participation showed significant decreases in CT UR in 2017 compared to 2018 for Syncope (56.4% vs 48.0%; 95% CI: -12.7%, -4.1%) and Minor Head Injury (76.3% vs 72.1%; 95% CI: -7.3%, -1.1%). There was no significant change in imaging UR for Atraumatic Back Pain for XR (36.0% vs 33.3%; 95% CI: -5.9%, -0;5%), CT (20.1% vs 17.7%; 95% CI: -5.1%, -0.4%) or MRI (0.8% vs 0.7%, 95% CI: -0.4%, -0.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Early data from the E-QUAL Avoidable Imaging Initiative suggests QI interventions could potentially improve imaging stewardship and reduce low-value care. Further efforts to translate the Choosing Wisely recommendations into practice should promote data-driven benchmarking and learning collaboratives to achieve sustained practice improvement.

摘要

目的

为了对参与急诊质量网络(E-QUAL)可避免成像倡议的急诊(ED)站点的表现进行评估,该倡议针对的是美国急诊医师学会选择明智清单上的临床目标。

方法

这是一项观察性的质量改进(QI)研究,数据来自 2017 年至 2018 年期间的医院 ED 站点。参与的 ED 站点报告了三个选择明智目标的成像利用率(UR)和常见 QI 实践:非创伤性下腰痛、晕厥或轻度头部损伤。

结果

305 个 ED 站点参与了该倡议。在所有 ED 站点中,非创伤性下腰痛的 X 光 UR 平均为 34.7%(IQR 26.3%-42.6%),CT 为 19.1%(IQR 11.4%-24.9%),MRI 为 0.09%(IQR 0%-0.9%)。晕厥的 CT UR 平均为 50.0%(IQR 38.0%-61.4%)。轻度头部损伤的 CT UR 平均为 72.6%(IQR 65.6%-81.7%)。持续参与的 ED 站点在 2017 年与 2018 年相比,晕厥的 CT UR 显著下降(56.4%比 48.0%;95%CI:-12.7%,-4.1%)和轻度头部损伤(76.3%比 72.1%;95%CI:-7.3%,-1.1%)。X 光(36.0%比 33.3%;95%CI:-5.9%,-0;5%)、CT(20.1%比 17.7%;95%CI:-5.1%,-0.4%)或 MRI(0.8%比 0.7%;95%CI:-0.4%,-0.3%)的非创伤性腰痛的成像 UR 没有显著变化。

结论

E-QUAL 可避免成像倡议的早期数据表明,QI 干预措施可能有助于改善成像管理,减少低价值的医疗服务。进一步努力将选择明智的建议转化为实践,应该促进基于数据的基准测试和学习合作,以实现持续的实践改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f837/7365747/bbe48c984527/nihms-1556343-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f837/7365747/bbe48c984527/nihms-1556343-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f837/7365747/bbe48c984527/nihms-1556343-f0001.jpg