• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相信我?消费者对食品产品标签上专家信息的信任。

Trust me? Consumer trust in expert information on food product labels.

机构信息

Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, 457-4 Motoyama, Kamigamo, Kita-ku, Kyoto, 603-8047, Japan.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Mar;137:111170. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111170. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111170
PMID:32014536
Abstract

Food product labels can provide consumers with rich, specific, expert-certified product information. However, sources of label information differ. How do consumers then evaluate label trustworthiness of expert labels in comparison to other commonly used label types? We present results from a representative online survey (N = 10,000) of consumers in Japan, the USA, Germany, China and Thailand using professionally designed labels for four food types (milk, honey, oil, wine) and five different sources of food information (farmers, government/administration, producer associations, experts, and consumers). We tested label legibility through identification of the label information source and asked respondents to evaluate the trustworthiness of labels using a six-scale instrument ranging from overall label trust to purchase intent. Results show that label legibility varied between countries, with expert labels scoring lowest. Nevertheless, respondents correctly identifying all label information sources chose expert labels as the most or second-most trustworthy across all countries and food types, while consumer labels scored low. Demographic factors exhibited weak influence. Results suggest expert labels might play an important role as trusted sources of information in an increasingly complex global food system. Finally, we consider the implications of the study for a potential institutionalization of expert labels based on the Japanese context.

摘要

食品标签可以为消费者提供丰富、具体、经过专家认证的产品信息。然而,标签信息的来源各不相同。那么,与其他常用的标签类型相比,消费者如何评估专家标签的可信度呢?我们展示了一项针对日本、美国、德国、中国和泰国消费者的代表性在线调查的结果(N=10000),该调查使用了针对四种食品类型(牛奶、蜂蜜、油、酒)和五种不同食品信息来源(农民、政府/管理部门、生产者协会、专家和消费者)的专业设计标签。我们通过识别标签信息来源来测试标签可读性,并使用六刻度工具评估受访者对标签的可信度,范围从整体标签可信度到购买意向。结果表明,标签的可读性在各国之间存在差异,专家标签的得分最低。尽管如此,在所有国家和食品类型中,正确识别所有标签信息来源的受访者都选择了专家标签作为最可信或第二可信的标签,而消费者标签的得分则较低。人口统计学因素的影响较弱。结果表明,在日益复杂的全球食品体系中,专家标签可能作为可信信息来源发挥重要作用。最后,我们考虑了该研究对基于日本背景的专家标签潜在制度化的影响。

相似文献

1
Trust me? Consumer trust in expert information on food product labels.相信我?消费者对食品产品标签上专家信息的信任。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Mar;137:111170. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111170. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
2
The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification.可追溯标签信任对消费者追溯性猪肉购买行为的影响:基于食品安全识别的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306041. eCollection 2024.
3
The mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods in Brazil: Consumer's knowledge, trust, and risk perception.巴西强制标识转基因食品:消费者的知识、信任和风险感知。
Food Res Int. 2020 Jun;132:109053. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109053. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
4
Who Reads Food Labels? Selected Predictors of Consumer Interest in Front-of-Package and Back-of-Package Labels during and after the Purchase.谁会阅读食品标签?购买前后,消费者对食品标签中“营养成分表”和“配料表”关注的预测因素分析
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 27;12(9):2605. doi: 10.3390/nu12092605.
5
Examining trust factors in online food risk information: The case of unpasteurized or 'raw' milk.审视在线食品风险信息中的信任因素:以未杀菌或“生”牛奶为例。
Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?良好福利的代价:向消费者告知包装标签上的动物福利信息是否会影响他们的购买意愿?
Appetite. 2020 May 1;148:104577. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104577. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
7
Food Traceability Systems, Consumers' Risk Perception, and Purchase Intention: Evidence from the "4-label-1-Q" Approach in Taiwan.食品可追溯系统、消费者风险感知与购买意愿:来自台湾“四标一 Q”模式的证据。
J Food Prot. 2022 Jan 1;85(1):155-163. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-160.
8
Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.消费者安全消费非理性行为及其影响因素研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122764.
9
Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.两种包装正面营养标签方案及其解释对消费者对产品健康感知和食品选择的比较。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Do Consumers Want More Nutritional and Health Information on Wine Labels? Insights from the EU and USA.消费者是否希望在葡萄酒标签上看到更多营养与健康信息?来自欧盟和美国的见解。
Nutrients. 2016 Jul 7;8(7):416. doi: 10.3390/nu8070416.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Analysis of Consumers' Avoidance of Snack Food Ingredients Across 13 Countries Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Method.使用复选法(CATA)对13个国家消费者对休闲食品成分的回避情况进行跨文化分析。
Foods. 2025 May 13;14(10):1729. doi: 10.3390/foods14101729.
2
Dietary Habits and Their Correlation with Socio-Demographic Variables Among the Ethnic Hungarian Population of Romania.罗马尼亚匈牙利族人口的饮食习惯及其与社会人口学变量的相关性
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 21;17(5):756. doi: 10.3390/nu17050756.
3
Evaluating source credibility effects in health labelling using vending machines in a hospital setting.
在医院环境中使用自动售货机评估健康标签中的来源可信度效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0296901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296901. eCollection 2024.
4
How Do Consumers Living in European Capital Cities Perceive Foods with Sustainability Certificates?居住在欧洲首都城市的消费者如何看待带有可持续发展认证的食品?
Foods. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):4215. doi: 10.3390/foods12234215.
5
Packaging Communication as a Tool to Reduce Disgust with Insect-Based Foods: Effect of Informative and Visual Elements.将包装宣传作为减少对昆虫类食品反感的工具:信息性和视觉元素的影响
Foods. 2023 Sep 28;12(19):3606. doi: 10.3390/foods12193606.
6
Metabolomics: A suitable foodomics approach to the geographical origin traceability of Ethiopian Arabica specialty coffees.代谢组学:一种适用于埃塞俄比亚阿拉比卡特色咖啡地理来源追溯的食品组学方法。
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 May 24;11(8):4419-4431. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3434. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Categorizations of Trust and Distrust in the Classifications and Social Representations of Food among Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women in Spain-Applying the Cultural Domains' Pile Sort Technique.西班牙孕妇和哺乳期妇女对食物的分类和社会认知中的信任和不信任分类——应用文化领域的堆积分类技术。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 26;20(5):4195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054195.
8
Consumer risk perception and trusted sources of food safety information during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间消费者的风险认知与食品安全信息的可靠来源
Food Control. 2021 Dec;130:108279. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108279. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Attention to detail: A photo-elicitation study of salience and packaging design for portion control and healthy eating.注重细节:照片引发的关于份量控制和健康饮食的凸显度和包装设计的研究。
Nutr Bull. 2022 Dec;47(4):501-515. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12588. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Effects of communication style, anthropomorphic setting and individual differences on older adults using voice assistants in a health context.在健康领域,沟通风格、拟人化设置和个体差异对老年人使用语音助手的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Sep 15;22(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03428-2.